Supreme Court to hear argument over opioid settlement deal | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Supreme Court to hear argument over opioid settlement deal


Purdue Pharma faces thousands of civil lawsuits. Associated Press/Photo by Douglas Healey

Supreme Court to hear argument over opioid settlement deal

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday put a hold on Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy deal, agreeing to hear case arguments in December. The agreement would shield the Sackler family, owner of the drug manufacturer, from civil claims related to the opioid crisis. Under the agreement, the family would receive immunity in exchange for paying up to $6 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits filed by states, hospitals, and individuals. Purdue Pharma filed for bankruptcy in 2019 after lawsuits were filed against the company for its marketing of the addictive painkiller OxyContin. In a recent statement to the media, Purdue Pharma said it was “confident in the legality” of its plan to reorganize, and was disappointed the payment had been delayed.

Why is the agreement being challenged? A bankruptcy judge in 2021 approved the settlement. The Justice Department argued the bankruptcy court does not have the authority to grant individuals legal immunity from civil claims. A U.S. appeals court in May ruled in favor of the settlement plan.

Dig deeper: Read Emily Belz’s report in WORLD Magazine on record-breaking drug overdose deaths during the pandemic.


Lauren Canterberry

Lauren Canterberry is a reporter for WORLD. She graduated from the World Journalism Institute and the University of Georgia with a degree in journalism, both in 2017. She worked as a local reporter in Texas and now lives in Georgia with her husband.


An actual newsletter worth subscribing to instead of just a collection of links. —Adam

Sign up to receive The Sift email newsletter each weekday morning for the latest headlines from WORLD’s breaking news team.
COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments