Supreme Court sidesteps gun rights case | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Supreme Court sidesteps gun rights case


A shooting range in Lee’s Summit, Mo. Associated Press/Photo by Charlie Riedel (file)

Supreme Court sidesteps gun rights case

Instead of ruling on gun owners’ rights, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday found a controversial New York City case moot because local officials recently rescinded the law. New York City had prohibited licensed gun owners from taking their firearms outside the city limits to places such as shooting ranges and second homes. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas dissented, arguing the law blatantly violated the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Why did New York City rescind the law? After the Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge from three gun owners, city officials seemed to realize the law would not hold up in court and nixed it. Instead of arguing the merits of the case, the defense argued it was a moot question.

Dig deeper: Read the court’s opinion.


Harvest Prude

Harvest is a former political reporter for WORLD’s Washington Bureau. She is a World Journalism Institute and Patrick Henry College graduate.

@HarvestPrude


An actual newsletter worth subscribing to instead of just a collection of links. —Adam

Sign up to receive The Sift email newsletter each weekday morning for the latest headlines from WORLD’s breaking news team.
COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments