Supreme Court renews stance on race-based gerrymandering | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Supreme Court renews stance on race-based gerrymandering


The Supreme Court Associated Press/Photo by J. Scott Applewhite

Supreme Court renews stance on race-based gerrymandering

The Supreme Court ruled today that two congressional districts in North Carolina needed to be redrawn because race played too large a role in their creation. Both of the districts were redone on the 2016 congressional map, but the state of North Carolina continued to defend the original makeup of the districts in court. The justices ruled that Republicans who controlled the state legislature and governor's office in 2011 placed too many African-Americans in the two districts in attempt to weaken African-American voting strength elsewhere in North Carolina. The state argued the districts were drawn mainly for political reasons, not racial ones. States have to take race into account when drawing maps for legislative, congressional, and a host of municipal political districts. But race can’t be the predominant factor without very strong reasons, according to a line of high court cases stretching back 20 years.

We Sift the news so you don’t have to.


Lynde Langdon

Lynde is WORLD’s executive editor for news. She is a graduate of World Journalism Institute, the Missouri School of Journalism, and the University of Missouri–St. Louis. Lynde resides with her family in Wichita, Kan.

@lmlangdon


An actual newsletter worth subscribing to instead of just a collection of links. —Adam

Sign up to receive The Sift email newsletter each weekday morning for the latest headlines from WORLD’s breaking news team.
COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments