Scientists stunned by the public's doubt of Darwin | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Scientists stunned by the public's doubt of Darwin


Robert Lefkowitz MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

Scientists stunned by the public's doubt of Darwin

The scientific establishment recoiled in horror when a recent poll revealed a majority of Americans doubt the truth of Darwin’s evolutionary theory. The poll by the Associated Press and GfK showed that Americans have more skepticism than confidence in the Big Bang, global warming, the earth’s age, and evolution. The majority was slim—51 percent, not even within the poll’s margin of error—but scientists were crushed to learn there weren’t more true believers in atheistic theories.

But they shouldn’t be so surprised, said Stephen Meyer, the director of the Center for Science and Culture at The Discovery Institute.

“They tend to be skeptical about … theories that are about events that are in the remote past, which are essentially historical in character and which cannot be verified in the same way that you would verify things in the laboratory,” said Meyer, who has written two books making the case for intelligent design. “So I don’t find this surprising, and I think it’s overall evidence of the public’s good horse sense in being able to distinguish ideology from scientific facts and evidence.”

Where Meyer cast the debate over evolution vs. intelligent design as philosophy vs. fact, many scientists the AP interviewed saw it the other way around. They dismissed the public’s skepticism of Darwinian evolution as “scientific ignorance”—facts versus faith. Nobel Prize winning biochemistry professor Robert Lefkowitz of Duke University attributed the poll results to “the force of concerted campaigns to discredit scientific fact,” citing significant interest groups—political, business, and religious—campaigning against scientific truths on vaccines, climate change, and evolution.

Meyer said that view under-represents the real facts being discovered in evolutionary biology.

“Very few leading evolutionary biologists today think that natural selection and random mutation are sufficient to produce the new forms of life we see arising in the history of life,” Meyer said. “And then when the public is catching wind of the scientific doubts of Darwinian evolution and expresses them in a poll like this, these self-appointed spokesmen for science say that the public is ignorant. But actually, the public is more in line with what’s going on in science than these spokesmen for science.”

Listen to Nick Eicher’s full conversation with Stephen Meyer on The World and Everything in It:


Nick Eicher

Nick is chief content officer of WORLD and co-host for WORLD Radio. He has served WORLD Magazine as a writer and reporter, managing editor, editor, and publisher. Nick resides with his family in St. Louis, Mo.


Lynde Langdon

Lynde is WORLD’s executive editor for news. She is a graduate of World Journalism Institute, the Missouri School of Journalism, and the University of Missouri–St. Louis. Lynde resides with her family in Wichita, Kan.

@lmlangdon


An actual newsletter worth subscribing to instead of just a collection of links. —Adam

Sign up to receive The Sift email newsletter each weekday morning for the latest headlines from WORLD’s breaking news team.
COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments