Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

GOP pushes mail-in voting changes in Georgia

A stack of absentee ballots at a Richmond County elections facility in Augusta, Ga., on Monday Associated Press/Photo by Michael Holahan/The Augusta Chronicle

GOP pushes mail-in voting changes in Georgia

Georgia requires photo ID for in-person voting, and Republicans now want to require it for mail-in ballots as well. Georgia Senate committees held meetings Thursday to start the process of reviewing the state’s voting laws. Democrats argue the move would disenfranchise voters. Georgia officials have not found evidence of statewide fraud, although they have found occasional irregularities.

Have other states found systemic fraud? Michigan, another swing state that went for President-elect Joe Biden, has at this point found no evidence of statewide fraud. In a video address Tuesday, President Donald Trump claimed widespread fraud influenced the election results. Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis repeated those claims during a Wednesday hearing in Michigan and urged the state legislature to “take back” power to choose electors. GOP Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey said legislators planned to follow the normal process. Meanwhile in Washington, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said it’s time for Trump’s legal team to prove its claims: “Doing a video is not proof.”

Dig deeper: Read Harvest Prude’s report on Biden’s planned Cabinet nominations.

Kyle Ziemnick

Kyle is a WORLD Digital news reporter. He is a World Journalism Institute and Patrick Henry College graduate. Kyle resides in Purcellville, Va.



Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.


I agree with HA's comment above:  one corrupt city's voting could be enough to change the overall vote of a state. Statewide fraud isn't necessary. 

I'm certain there were instances of fraud in this election, and possibly every large election.  The real question is, was there enough to change the outcome of the election?  Personally, I have my doubts. 


Please note that just because there was not statewide fraud, that does not mean that there was no fraud nor does it mean that fraud that occurred in some counties or some cities did not change the result of the election.  From what we have heard, there most definitely was fraud.  Please do not pass over this merely because it wasn't everywhere.  This is like saying that because a cornerback did not commit pass intererence every time the ball was thrown to the receiver he was defending, therefore he never committed pass interference and especially not on the one play that would have let the other team win.  This is very poor logic.