The Church of England recommends affirming one’s baptism after sex change
The Church of England issued pastoral guidance last month instituting a new “gender transition service,” a move conservative Anglicans decried as contrary to the Bible.
The guidance, published Dec. 11 and approved by the House of Bishops, the upper house of the tricameral Church of England General Synod, laid out a model for a “celebratory” service to mark the church’s official recognition of a person as a sex different from that of his or her birth. The statement, which asserted “unconditional affirmation of trans people,” recommended the rite of publicly affirming one’s baptism as a way for people who identify as the opposite sex to “rededicate their life and identity to God.” It also instructed ministers to lay hands on and pray for the individual using his or her chosen name. The document warned that some transgender individuals will not want their former name or gender mentioned and defended the practice of taking on a new name as a historic Biblical tradition.
About 18 months ago, the General Synod passed a motion urging the church to welcome and affirm transgender individuals and calling on the House of Bishops to create liturgical materials for sex-change recognition. The newly released guidance will be incorporated into the Church of England’s official library of services, called Common Worship.
But leaders in the broader Anglican Communion say the new service is an adulteration of baptism and an affront to a Biblical understanding of sex as God-ordained and permanent.
“The sacrament of baptism is designed to signify the new identity that is given to us in union with Jesus Christ through his death and resurrection,” said Andy Lines, the missionary bishop to Europe with the Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON), a movement of conservative Anglicans with more than 50 million members. Lines said the use of a baptism service to recognize sex change dismayed GAFCON members.
“In doing this, the House of Bishops has denied the teaching of Jesus Christ, not least by rejecting His words, ‘He who created them from the beginning made them male and female,’ in favor of celebrating a self-created identity,” he said, referencing Matthew 19:4. “It is because our hearts go out to all those who struggle with their gender identity that we cannot commend this false gospel or walk with those who promote it.”
Leaders within the Church of England are also critical. At least 10 bishops and a number of priests have said they cannot perform the new service and have asked for a conscience clause, The Times of London reported.
Bishop Julian Henderson led the committee that wrote the guidance and initially came out in support of the change, claiming it was “rooted in Scripture” and commending it for wider use. He backtracked a few days later, issuing a statement co-signed by other members of the Church of England Evangelical Council distancing himself from the guidance.
The wishy-washy response has left clergy with unanswered questions, including whether they will be required to perform the service and how they should handle marriages after sex changes, since the church does not currently affirm or conduct same-sex marriages.
The Rev. Ian Paul, a member of the Church of England’s Archbishops’ Council, raised other unanswered pastoral issues with The Times: “What would it say for the church to ‘celebrate’ gender-identity change to the spouse who feels betrayed, to the children who feel abandoned, to the parent who feels bereaved—and even to those who have undergone transition and now regret the decision?”
Editor’s note: This article has been updated to reflect that the Church of England recommends an affirmation of baptism for transgender individuals, not rebaptism.
A survey by an advocacy group in Great Britain recently found a policy allowing medical workers with the National Health Service (NHS) to designate their own gender has dissuaded some women from accessing gynecological care. The survey, by the group Women and Girls in Scotland, asked women if they had ever excluded themselves from a healthcare service because of gender concerns.
A handful of women said yes. “I’ve already missed three smear tests because I’m so scared of being presented with a male nurse,” one woman told them, according to The Times of London.
“To be told that I can’t be guaranteed female-only care and I won’t be told when that might not be achievable—those are both real violations of my trust in the health service,” said one woman who had experienced a sexual assault as a teen. “If someone is telling me they’re female, when I can see that they’re male, I’m already thinking the worst. They’re already lying to me. I would leave.”
One NHS branch in Scotland told The Times said they could not guarantee a health provider would be female because doing so would violate two laws: the Gender Recognition Act of 2004 and the Equality Act of 2010. (The same NHS branch recently advised its staff to refer to every patient using the pronoun “they” to avoid offending a transgender individual.)
Women and Girls in Scotland is campaigning for men who identify as women to be excluded from carrying out female-only care. The group argued the current policy “could prevent women from accessing potentially life-saving healthcare.” —K.C.
Two women became the first same-sex couple to officially marry in Austria this week. The Austrian Constitutional Court in 2017 ruled that same-sex couples should have the right to marry starting Jan. 1, 2019. The country’s current governing parties, the People’s Party and the Freedom Party, opposed the decision but said they would respect the court’s ruling.
Austria joins 25 other countries around the world that recognize and perform same-sex marriages. Three others—Armenia, Estonia, and Israel—do not allow same-sex marriages but recognize those performed in other countries. The high courts in Costa Rica and Taiwan also recently ruled their legislatures must soon change their laws to let same-sex couples wed. —K.C.
Recent research argues China’s skewed sex ratio—a by-product of its longtime and ruthless one-child policy—is partially to blame for the country’s skyrocketing crime rates. The report, published by the academic website GlobalDev, found evidence that China’s approximately 30 million “surplus” men account for a 34 percent increase in the crime rate. The Chinese government is taking steps to counter the skewed population, but even if it succeeds (critics argue it won’t unless it forces childbearing), it will take a least a generation to reach gender parity. —K.C.
If you enjoyed this article and would like to support WORLD's brand of Biblically sound journalism, click here.