Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Racism in the newsroom

An African American journalist’s memories


Racism in the newsroom

Other Press

Scots language poet Robert Burns in 1786 wrote, “O wad some Pow’r the giftie gie us”—no, let’s use standard English translation: “Oh, would some Power give us the gift / To see ourselves as others see us! / It would from many a blunder free us, / And foolish notion.” White Christians can learn from Issac J. Bailey, an eloquent journalist and Davidson College professor who views the present through the prism of a lynching past in which many Christians were complicit.

I did not previously know the story of Mary Turner, burned alive in 1918 with her unborn child cut from her stomach and stomped on by attackers, after she protested the lynching of her husband. So while I don’t agree with some of Bailey’s contentions and prescriptions, I can see why the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, fit into a history of abuse. Here, reprinted by permission from Other Press, is an excerpt from Why Didn’t We Riot? A Black Man in Trumpland, an honorable mention in WORLD’s 2020 Books of the Year list. —Marvin Olasky

The black-and-white image was of a crudely drawn, savage-looking, kinky-haired, emaciated black man dressed like Tarzan. He was sitting on a beach, apparently somewhere in Africa. It came with this caption: “Ever hear blacks refer to their ‘rich African heritage?’ Let’s have a look . . .” The large bone through the man’s large nose was labeled “African fashion,” the straw hut behind him “African architecture,” a shellfish impaled by a spear “African cuisine” and “African invention,” respectively. A single finger-drawn line in the sand was “African literature.”

“Can you name any African philosophers?” it asked.

It was one of the first pieces of reader hate mail I received after I began writing about race for the (Myrtle Beach) Sun News. It came in the form of a letter from a man calling himself John Macx, “Propaganda Deputy, Illinois KKK/Chicago Den.” It was in response to columns in which I tried to empathize with white people. I revealed the irrational fear of black men I had been fighting for years in an effort to make them comfortable enough to admit theirs. I apologized to African slaves for once having been ashamed of them for reasons I still can’t fully explain.

As a black lead columnist for a newspaper in Trumpland, I knew I had to pick my battles wisely. Focusing on the racists would leave me no time to think about anything else. I eventually threw away a large stack of hate mail that had been growing by the week. But I held onto the “African heritage” letter. It struck a nerve, not because there was any truth to it, but because growing up in the South, a part of me had been conditioned to believe there was.

In June 2019, I traveled to Ghana for the first time, the “Year of Return,” which marked the four-hundredth anniversary of the first enslaved Africans shipped to what would become the United States. For most of my life, I wanted no connection to the dark continent. I had been convinced, by whom or what I don’t precisely know, that the American in my African-American was better than the African. It didn’t matter that I could trace my familial line directly to the race-based chattel slavery in the region of South Carolina where I was born and raised and still reside.

I can’t tell you how I came to view Africa and my dark skin negatively. Maybe it grew from being taught from state-sanctioned history books in segregated schools that spoke of happy slaves, unsavory abolitionists, and heroic Confederate soldiers who were just trying to protect their homeland. Maybe it got rooted in when my oldest brother committed murder when I was a nine-year-old, linking in my mind violent and black. Maybe it was solidified by my sometimes-quiet acceptance of racial injustice and inequality inside newsrooms in an industry struggling with how best to reflect the nation’s emerging diversity. I’ve had white colleagues in one breath say my writings about race were radical and irresponsible and in the next admit they had not bothered to study the racial history I was alluding to. No matter my nuance or depth of knowledge or their racial ignorance, they were “objective” and I wasn’t.

The depth of the horror faced by generations of black people here is hard to fathom. It could come across as dystopic science fiction from a madman if you didn’t know it was real. Who would think there was a time in Georgia a black woman named Mary Turner could have been lynched—burned alive, her fetus cut from her stomach and stomped on by her attackers — for the sin of wanting justice for her husband, who had also been lynched? Or that it would be done in public, with the full knowledge of local authorities and a gaggle of giddy white Christians? It’s not just about my former white colleagues, white people in general, or the white mobs who arose every time black people made progress. It’s about me, too, and my sometimes reluctance to speak racial truths I know will upset white people.

I understand why introducing white readers to facts they didn’t want to be made aware of will discomfort them. That task is made more difficult when journalists are unwilling or unable to properly deal with racial tension within their orbits. Too many times, I didn’t handle it properly. Too many times, I gave in and was weak when I needed to be steadfast.

I once wrote about a prominent white man in Myrtle Beach who lost a real estate case. He marched into my editor’s office saying I was biased because the couple he lost to was black like me. Never mind that I had never met the couple and didn’t know they were black. For all I knew, they were blue, which happened to be their last name. I wrote the story based on interviews with their white attorney and court documents. None of that mattered. My editors allowed him to write a long letter to the editor taking me to task — without naming a single factual error I had made — after they printed a lengthy “correction” to my article, which consisted of his side of the story, even though he had turned down my request for comment before the story was published. I stewed about the indignity but swallowed hard, as black people in Trumpland are taught to. I neither let on it bothered me nor spoke about it with my colleagues.

In another instance, as I was returning to my desk from lunch, my white publisher dressed me down in the newsroom for having written a column she didn’t like. A group of irate conservative, white readers had grown more boisterous and had been in her ear about me. They had been hounding her for weeks. They wanted me gone. It wasn’t the first time a group of white readers wanted me disappeared from the newspaper, or at least neutered, and wouldn’t be the last. But she was the first publisher I had who had decided to give in to the pressure. She called me and my editor to her office a couple of times to tell me to stop writing about race and politics the way I had been doing long before she was hired. The first meeting was a gentle demand; the second time she dropped the gentle. I left each one thinking I had to write the way I knew I should, that doing so could mean the end of my career at the Sun News, that doing anything else would be journalistically unethical. For the first time since I was a newbie journalist who believed my severe stutter would lead to my professional demise, I walked into the office every day thinking it might be my last and left every evening warning my wife that tomorrow might be the day.

Once again, I swallowed hard and did not let my colleagues in the newsroom know what was happening. I briefly let it slip during a conversation with a colleague in our DC bureau. He wanted to highlight it in a journalistic newsletter. I told him not to. He asked if he could do it anonymously. I still told him no. I still don’t fully understand why. As journalists, we are to shine light in dark places, even if we happen to be in one of them. In that instance, I didn’t. I failed. I think—think—a part of me wanted to protect her from charges of racism. She wasn’t racist, isn’t racist, but was giving in to readers trying to pressure a black man to either be less black or be out of a job. Some of those readers had begun sending me provocative, hateful email messages hoping I’d say something in response that could give my publisher cause to fire me. It should be noted that South Carolina is a so-called right to work state. Union membership is nearly nonexistent. Most of us don’t work under contract. I didn’t. There were no union protections to rely upon.

It’s odd, I know. I was enduring her wrath but trying to protect her image. It’s akin to what white journalists have been doing in the Trump era, protecting the image of those causing the most harm, perhaps out of a sense of guilt or obligation. Things went on that way seemingly forever, though probably only several months. As I was shielding my publisher from a public reckoning, I was publicly thanking the paper’s mostly white readership for accepting me. Almost none of them had called me [n-word], many supported me, and the “African heritage” hate mail letters were few and far between, I wrote. I also thanked the white editors who stood up for me during my toughest moments. I’d be greeted warmly at Republican political events by people with whom I strongly disagreed. They loved that I was outwardly loving toward the region and appreciative of the United States. They could use me to counter the white-hot, righteous black anger that was Reverend H. H. Singleton, the outspoken president of the local NAACP, with whom I sometimes clashed.

I was doing the dutiful thing many successful black Americans do, repeatedly paying public homage to the white people who had “given me an opportunity” and “allowed” me to use my skills. When white conservative readers created a loud chorus to punish me for being too black, I stoically, silently endured it. That was required of black people, I was taught while growing up in Trumpland. Though I had no say over what the ocean decided, I was to make no waves.

My publisher didn’t stop until my reporting led to high-profile national writing awards, as well as a top journalistic prize from corporate executives, a real feat for a newspaper our size. Almost overnight, it was as though none of it had happened, she had backed off so suddenly and completely. She invited me to a Christmas party at her house. She told me to visit her in the new city where she eventually moved and said it would be great having me write for the newspaper she took over after leaving Myrtle Beach. (That didn’t materialize. I took other writing and teaching jobs; they prioritized political coverage needs.)

There were many other slights I swallowed. After I began as the first black lead columnist for the only daily newspaper in Myrtle Beach, taking over for a beloved white columnist whose lighthearted take on politics had endeared him to many, I had to fight off attempts by my well-meaning white editors to “tone it down” a bit, the same editors who would later defend me against the publisher. They didn’t want me to be seen as the “black columnist.” They simply could not hear me when I repeatedly said there was nothing I could do about that. It was hard to get them to hear even when a few readers called in to say I was throwing a gang sign in the photo that accompanied my column, when all I had done was rest my chin between my thumb and index finger while staring into the camera. Other times, I had white colleagues—including those I frequently spoke in favor of during tense moments in the newsroom— tell me my opinions about race were suspect, and they said this in ways they would never use with white columnists who also had strong opinions. I was being too black; they were determined to guide me back to respectability.

In those environments, I knew if I wrote about race, many of my white colleagues would consider it unserious journalism. I also knew if I didn’t, the subject would hardly ever get a sober examination in our pages other than after racially explosive events. At least that’s the way it felt. For a long time, I spoke more about the years I spent being the region’s primary real estate journalist, my reporting on the manufacturing industry, and my time as business editor than my writing and reporting on race. It was my subtle way of proving I was a legitimate journalist doing legitimate work despite my blackness.

At another paper, the white editor and publisher forbade me from comparing the Confederacy and its aftermath to the Holocaust. It would be unfair to white readers who revered the Confederate flag, I was told. All of this was happening as I was receiving “African heritage” letters and death and other kinds of threats I told almost no one about, and as I was struggling to balance the views of black people who had long been ignored and those of white readers who wanted to talk about race only if it was to tell black people that racial disparities were our own fault. I was also writing about my experiences of being a black man in the South who had never been racially profiled by police, which angered some of my black friends. I turned over one column to a Tea Party member so he could explain that group’s point of view. I revealed my friendship with a white man who had decorated his house with the Confederate flag and Gone with the Wind memorabilia. I took to task civil rights icon Harry Belafonte when he referred to Colin Powell as essentially a house [n-word], and I spoke of my bipartisan voting record. I even defended a local college professor who used the racial trope “go back to Africa” during an argument on campus. None of that convinced many white conservative readers, or a number of my white colleagues, that I was being fair to white people. All they wanted was for me to point out the flaws of black people or say nothing about race at all. Going beyond the parameters they set meant I was a black radical.

Many years after I left the paper, I asked some of my former colleagues what they thought of those incidents, particularly those concerning race in the newsroom. To a person, they hardly remembered any of them. Those incidents, which nearly convinced me to resign several times or quit the news industry altogether, hadn’t registered with them at all. Not only that, my former publisher was offended because I asked the question at all, even though I was careful to couch my question with a sincere “I know it wasn’t about racism for you, but … ” She stopped returning my messages. I haven’t spoken with her since.

From Why Didn’t We Riot? A Black Man in Trumpland by Issac J. Bailey. Copyright © 2020. Published by Other Press. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Issac J. Bailey

Issac J. Bailey Axel Dupeux for the Open Society Foundations

Issac J. Bailey

Issac J. Bailey is an award-winning journalist and the James K. Batten Professor of Public Policy at Davidson College. He has been published in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Charlotte Observer, Politico Magazine, Time, and many more, and has appeared on NPR, CNN, and MSNBC. Bailey was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard University and has taught journalism and applied ethics at Coastal Carolina University.


Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.

Gregory P

I was struck by this article, and am glad I read it, although I agree with Marvin Olasky's caution that he does not agree "with some of Bailey’s contentions and prescriptions." There was a time decades ago when options were apparently more limited for "coloreds" or "Negroes," as they were called then. But educational, occupational, and living situations are completely open now, and it would be difficult for me to think over about half a century of anyone objecting to someone of different skin color or ethnicity being next to him in a neighborhood, classroom, job, or church. I have been studying James 2 (especially verses 1-13) in recent weeks, and this article gave me pause to think that some people had faced different obstacles that I had not. There was a time when it was said that 11 o'clock Sunday morning was the most segregated hour of the week. It has been decades since I have heard that. The Christians and their message should demonstrate how all peoples of different ethnicities can be as one (Galatians 3:26-29; Colossians 3:9-11). The image and note that starts this piece was from a self described KKK leader, and should not be used to characters those in "Trumpland." I appreciate that Mr.Bailey did not characterize everyone who expressed pressure against him as a racist. Persecution against Christians continues to be rampant, as Jesus predicted (John 15:18-21).


It's tough to know how to respond to this. On the one hand, the raw ugliness that Mr. Bailey has encountered certainly removes any doubt that racism is a true menace. On the other hand, it's tragic that the encounters Mr Bailey had made him view so many other negative incidents though the lens of racial bias and discrimination. I first encountered Mr. Bailey's work in the article below, where he recounts how some ignorant and insensitive comments made by his white brothers and sisters in Christ caused him to be increasingly embittered against them and lead him to abandon the church where he had been saved and baptised.

I know I have blind spots and I need to listen intently to my fellow brothers who see things differently then I do. But looking though Mr. Bailey's social media postings I don't see the characteristics of someone who is marked by the fruit of the spirit, but who appears to believe fully in the most divisive elements of critical race theory. I've defended CRT to friends as a potentially helpful tool for thinking about the way the think, like a personality test. But if the end is hated, anger, and bitterness, it may indeed be too toxic to use. We all need the upmost humility and grace as we enter into these difficult conversations.


I greatly admire and appreciate Mr. Bailey's commitment to speak what he saw as the truth in the face of losing his career. Through all the recent racial turmoil I've been looking for black voices that can help me better understand the thoughts and experiences of black Americans. Mr. Bailey has done that. However, what he describes as racial opposition in the workplace, sounds surprisingly similar to opposition I, a white man, have experienced in my workplace, from those who didn't like me, disagreed with me or quite often both. Everyone has experienced discrimination, the challenge is determining what is purely racially motivated and what is not.


Quite frankly I get tired of hearing about race. It is always meant to control us, and make us feel guilty as though we owe people something. The reality is that history is filled with terrible injustices, that only God can make right. The PC mentality leads to the insanity that we need to get rid of police. It will allow racist bigots of the left to attack white people, Jews, Asians, Christians and gays, and at the same time they claim that Trump supporters are racists because we don’t bow to the lies of the left. It is pure insanity!
George Floyd’s death had nothing to do with racism. His drug use of fentanyl and associated erratic behavior was what caused his death.

Here is a 2nd Amendment guy (likely a Republican supporter of Trump) saving Jews from Jew haters (likely leftists which we have seen happening all over America).



Trumpland???? I guess we all have blind spots, even someone who has frequently had to deal with racism and has often written in the subject of race.

What blind spot might I be referring to? Do you think all (or nearly all) racism and racists are products/characteristics of one party—the Republicans—of one particular Republican President—Donald Trump— or of the supporters of President Trump? Then you probably know very few Republicans/Trump supporters, you don’t particularly want to get to know any because you’re comfortable with the stereotypes you hold, and/or you’re brainwashed by our liberal media/Democrat establishment’s falsehoods.

Sorry Mr. Bailey, but this seriously colors my perception of your perceptiveness.


No temptation has overtaken you but such is common to man.... I get so frustrated by people of any race thinking all their problems are due to racial prejudice. My niece thinks her white doctor disrespects her for her blackness when in actual fact, doctors often don't respect their patients or their ideas. Some are just overly impressed with their own knowledge. This journalist sees every criticism as due to racial issues when in fact it may be due to his writing, personality, his ideas, or any other possibility. Not every slight is racial! A lot of journalists have conflicts with their editors. Black people train themselves and their children to expect their problems to be due to race so that's all they can see. Nobody wants to look at themselves critically and race is an easy scapegoat to justify not doing so.


Mr. Bailey, thank you for your honesty and courage. As I white woman, I am ashamed of what my race did to you.
Linda Ro

Todd Valerie M

Thanks for the opportunity to read an excerpt from the book. It is thought provoking and very transparent.