Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Biden inexplicably maintains Trump’s refugee cap

Admissions this year remain historically low


Migrants and refugees wait outside the UNHCR offices for their papers inside the camp of Moria on Lesbos island in Greece in 2019. Associated Press/Photo by Petros Giannakouris (file)

Biden inexplicably maintains Trump’s refugee cap

WASHINGTON—President Joe Biden is on track to admit the lowest number of refugees of any modern president.

In a Feb. 4 speech at the U.S. State Department, Biden committed to raising the refugee admissions cap to 125,000, up from former President Donald Trump’s limit of 15,000 for this fiscal year, which ends in September.

“It’s going to take time to rebuild what has been so badly damaged, but that’s precisely what we’re going to do,” the president said. “I’m directing the State Department to consult with Congress about making a down payment on that commitment as soon as possible.”

But more than two months later, the State Department still operates under the Trump administration’s refugee policies because Biden has yet to sign a presidential determination to make the new cap official.

The law requires the president to notify Congress before changing the refugee ceiling. On Feb. 12, Secretary of State Antony Blinken told lawmakers the administration planned to admit up to 62,500 refugees for the fiscal year. In a report to Congress, the State Department said the “grave humanitarian concerns” facing refugees around the world justified the change. But Biden has yet to sign on the dotted line to make the change official.

The State Department referred an inquiry about the delay to the White House. WORLD sent an inquiry to the White House press office but has not yet received a response. So far this fiscal year, the United States has admitted 2,050 refugees, according to the State Department.

The delay appears to have caught the State Department by surprise. In late February, the department had to cancel more than 700 flights booked for already vetted refugees.

The nonprofit organization International Rescue Committee (IRC) said that without a change in policy or pace, the administration is set to admit just over 4,500 refugees for the remainder of the year.

“We’re befuddled and frustrated,” said Matthew Soerens, U.S. director of church mobilization and advocacy for World Relief. He said that so far, his group’s questions to the White House have not resulted in any clarity on when the situation might change. He disputed the possibility that the pandemic was to blame, saying any refugees admitted would have to test negative for COVID-19 before getting on a flight to the United States.

Refugees differ from the asylum seekers trying to gain entry at the U.S. southern border. They apply for refugee status with the United States while still living abroad, often with the help of the UN refugee agency or a nongovernmental organization. Unlike asylum seekers at the southern border, some of whom can await adjudication of their immigration cases in the United States, refugees can only enter the country after their application is approved.

Trump currently holds the distinction for fewest refugees granted entry since the modern resettlement program’s genesis in 1980. He resettled just 11,841 refugees in fiscal year 2020. Historically, an average of 90,000 have come to the United States each year. There are 26.3 million refugees around the world, according to the UN Refugee Agency and fewer than 1 percent of them are resettled in various host countries.

Soerens said it will take time to get the refugee program back to full speed, and the delay is only hurting matters. More than one-third of U.S. resettlement offices closed during the Trump administration, with hundreds of workers losing their jobs. Trump also introduced more rigorous vetting requirements and restrictions on who could qualify for relief, slowing admissions to a crawl.

“We’ve had to reduce our capacity significantly over the past few years, as have the other eight resettlement agencies, so we’d not be prepared to receive our share of 62,500 refugees if they could all be processed and show up tomorrow.” Soerens said. “But the signing of a new refugee determination is basically the first step in that rebuilding process … even though that may take several months or even years.”

At an April 8 White House press briefing, a reporter asked press secretary Jen Psaki whether the president was still committed to raising the refugee cap to 62,500 by this fiscal year. Psaki said he was but gave no timeline for the change.

“If he ends the fiscal year as the president who presided over the lowest number of refugees resettled in the history of the program, which he is now on track to do, that will be his legacy, not President Trump’s,” Soerens said.


Harvest Prude

Harvest is a former political reporter for WORLD’s Washington Bureau. She is a World Journalism Institute and Patrick Henry College graduate.

@HarvestPrude

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments

Please register, subscribe, or login to comment on this article.


Steve SoCal

This is, of course, an important discussion on several levels.  But I'd like to address a couple of the realities and numbers presented. 

The article states that "Historically, an average of 90,000" refugees have come to the US each year, as if that is an easy number for us to handle well.  The fact is that the last year we received over 90,000 refugees was in 1995... 26 years ago.  (you can see the admissions report at https://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals/)  Since 1995 there have only been a couple years that hit 85,000 and others didn't come close to 90,000.

This figure also fails to clarify that the average is hugely skewed by the first few years of entries through the refugee program that were directly related to receiving victims of the war and the Communist takeover of Vietnam. 

Also, it needs to be acknowledged that some organizations do have a financial interest in the highest number of refugee arrivals possible, including some quoted in this article. 

With that said, America certainly needs to be a land that receives, and does a good job screening, welcoming, resettling, and integrating, good numbers of the suffering refugees around the world.  But we must be realistic about how many we can receive and do a good job of integrating in a positive way.  And, don't forget, those refugee numbers don't even include people who we receive from other categories each year. 

There are many strong voices on this issue who neither understand what it takes to resettle and integrate refugees, nor do they do much of anything, if anything, to participate.

Steve SoCal

This is, of course, an important discussion on several levels.  But I'd like to address a couple of the realities and numbers presented. 

The article states that "Historically, an average of 90,000" refugees have come to the US each year, as if that is an easy number for us to handle well.  The fact is that the last year we received over 90,000 refugees was in 1995... 26 years ago... and no year since then have refugee arrivals even approached 90,000.  (https://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/us-annual-refugee-resettlement-ceilings-and-number-refugees-admitted-united)  Since 1995 there have only been a couple years that hit 85,000 and others didn't come close to 90,000.

This figure also fails to clarify that the average is hugely skewed by the first few years of entries through the refugee program that were directly related to receiving victims of the war and the Communist takeover of Vietnam. 

Also, it needs to be acknowledged that some organizations do have a financial interest in the highest number of refugee arrivals possible, including some quoted in this article. 

With that said, America certainly needs to be a land that receives, and does a good job screening, welcoming, resettling, and integrating, good numbers of the suffering refugees around the world.  But we must be realistic about how many we can receive and do a good job of integrating in a positive way.  And, don't forget, those refugee numbers don't even include people who we receive from other categories each year. 

There are many strong voices on this issue who neither understand what it takes to resettle and integrate refugees, nor do they do much of anything, if anything, to participate.

OldMike

Ironic, isn't it, with all the Trump policies and actions the Biden/Pelosi/Schumer regime has cancelled,  the few they should  have cancelled, they haven't!

Do not expect anything good to come out of the current administration.