Bee in the bonnet
Christian satirical news site continues to dish up laughs and controversy
Liberal and secular satirical news outlets such as The Daily Show, Last Week Tonight with Jon Oliver, The Onion, and even Saturday Night Live’s “Weekend Update” segment come cheaper by the dozen these days. But there’s only one Babylon Bee.
The conservative and Christian satire site fills an underserved market, as evidenced by the regular viral reach of its articles. One recent headline was shared more than 1 million times on social media and stirred up an unusual amount of hard feelings: “Democrats Call For Flags To Be Flown At Half-Mast To Grieve Death Of Soleimani.” The Bee posted the article the same day a U.S. drone strike killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, whose forces tormented Iraqi Christians and who was said to have been planning imminent attacks on U.S. embassies.
Writer and media analyst Cindy Otis expressed concern on Twitter that some Republicans on Facebook thought the article was real, raising an angry online mob. CNN reporter Donie O’Sullivan chimed in to criticize the Bee, insinuating the site is “clickbait” and “misinformation” disguised as satire. Mainstream news outlets picked up the story. And the progressive religious magazine Relevant published a column by Jesse Carey calling the Soleimani article “problematic,” “misogynistic,” and “uniquely confusing.”
Babylon Bee editor Kyle Mann gave multiple interviews, including to WORLD Radio, defending the Bee’s brand of satire.
“The left is very supportive of comedy and very supportive of art and creativity until it targets them,” he said. “As long as there’s satire, there’s going to be people who misunderstand it. That’s just the nature of it.”
Among the barrage of criticism, some websites recirculated an August 2019 article from The Conversation with the headline “Study: Too many people think satirical news is real.” The report was based on a study that tested whether people could tell the difference between real and fake news. Researchers asked participants whether they believed the claims of 20 different news reports—10 real and 10 fake, including satire—every two weeks for six months. The study found that nine satirical articles from either The Babylon Bee or the Onion, a secular satire site, fooled at least 50 percent of respondents into thinking they were real.
The researchers dug deeper and discovered a link between political affiliation and the likelihood that a respondent would believe a claim. Republicans bought into Babylon Bee articles twice as often or more than Democrats did, while Democrats believed the Onion, a liberal-leaning site, more often than Republicans. In other words, the closer a satirical claim came to a person’s actual beliefs, the more likely they were to think it was real.
Psychologists have a name for the human tendency to believe facts that support their existing beliefs: confirmation bias. One groundbreaking study scanned the brains of devoted Republicans and Democrats during the 2004 presidential race between George W. Bush and John Kerry. Researchers watched what participants’ brains did as they evaluated threatening information about the candidate they supported. When faced with claims that contradicted their beliefs, parts of the subjects’ brains that control emotions lit up with activity, while the part most associated with reasoning stayed static. Additionally, the subjects got a surge in the reward circuits of their brains. Not only were they wired to develop a strong emotional attachment to their beliefs, distinct from rational thought, but it felt good for them to deny the truth of facts that did not support their existing opinions.
Scientists have searched for ways to hack the brain’s confirmation bias circuits but haven’t found anything that works consistently. From a survival standpoint, it makes sense. Without a certain degree of confidence in our own perceptions, we might waver indefinitely in the face of threats to our lives and livelihoods. But confirmation bias often makes us poor judges of facts, especially when it comes to topics we feel passionate about.
Some have suggested that the Bee label its posts as satire in the headline to protect readers from their confirmation biases. The website identifies itself as satire on its “About” page and it periodically runs a prominent on-site ad for its newsletter with the tagline “Fake News You Can Trust.” Its Facebook and Twitter pages and the title tag for its website, which users see when they google “Babylon Bee,” all announce it as satire. Anything more, Mann contended, would make the jokes less funny and therefore less satirical.
“We’re not going to put in our headline, ‘Here comes a joke. This is a joke,’” he said. “That’s just basic principles of satire humor.”
If there was no Babylon Bee or Onion, people would still tend to latch onto the news reports—fake or real—that supported their opinions. So why not have a laugh along the way?
Elizabeth Wurtzel, whose best-selling memoir Prozac Nation chronicled her struggles with depression and addiction, died of cancer on Tuesday. She was 52.
Wurtzel wrote Prozac Nation in 1994 when she was in her mid-20s. Some critics praised her for raising awareness of mental health with candor and humor. Others accused her of self-pity and self-indulgence. The public derided her after a 2002 interview with The Toronto Globe and Mail in which she said “everyone was overacting” to the 9/11 terror attacks. She later said her comments were misrepresented.
Growing up in a home torn by divorce, Wurtzel wrote of cutting herself when she was in her early teens and of spending her adolescence in a storm of tears, drugs, unhealthy relationships, and family fights. Many readers embraced her story and said she helped them face their own troubles.
Wurtzel wrote two other books and numerous personal essays for major publications.
In a 2015 article in The New York Times, she described her initial success in fighting her cancer diagnosis.
“I live in an age of miracles and wonders, when they cure cancer with viruses,” she wrote. “If I ever meet cancer again, I will figure it out. You see, I am very Jewish, which is to say ... I am undefeated by the worst. But I would have preferred to skip this. That would have been much better.” —L.L.
In her acceptance speech at Sunday night’s Golden Globe Awards, actress Michelle Williams seemed to thank her aborted baby for not getting in the way of her being able to do exactly what she wanted. “I’ve tried my very best to live a life of my own making and not just a series of events that happened to me,” she said. “I wouldn’t have been able to do this without employing a woman’s right to choose.” Williams went on to encourage other women to vote “in their own self-interest.” —L.L.
If you enjoyed this article and would like to support WORLD's brand of Biblically sound journalism, click here.