Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Abortion on the podium

Pro-abort athletes overlook stories of trauma


Sanya Richards-Ross at the Beijing Summer Olympics in 2008 Getty Images/Photo by Michael Steele

Abortion on the podium

This week, more than 500 female athletes filed an amicus brief calling on the Supreme Court to strike down a pro-life Mississippi law that protects babies from abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

The case, scheduled for oral arguments on Dec. 1, will test the reasoning of the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that established a nationwide legal right to abortion. Pro-lifers argue that, unlike in 1973, bearing children no longer rules out a successful career for mothers, undermining justification for abortion. But the athletes signing the brief disagree, minimizing the heartache of abortion to argue that the procedure is essential for women who want to excel in sports.

The signers claim they “depend on the right to control their bodies and reproductive lives in order to reach their athletic potential.” The physical tolls of “forced pregnancy” and birth, they argue, undermine their “full human potential.”

“I know I have a finite length of time to pursue my dreams in my sport,” wrote an unnamed Olympic soccer player who signed the brief. “I have honed my body and my mind through my efforts. To have any of that autonomy taken away, to have someone else make decisions for my body and my career, is to take away my life’s pursuit.”

Olympic gold medal swimmer Crissy Perham described her abortion during college as “a second chance at life.” She said it allowed her to keep competing and eventually win a national championship in a race that “changed the course of my life.” Another professional soccer player described abortion access as a “safeguard” to ensure that a pregnancy despite birth control would not jeopardize her dream of being an elite athlete.

But not all female athletes see abortion as beneficial to women. Brianna McNeal, a former Olympic hurdler, told The New York Times she missed a January 2020 doping test because she was recovering from a traumatic abortion. After aborting her baby to compete in the 2020 Olympics, she saw a spiritual adviser about the resulting depression. The news that COVID-19 would push back the 2020 games devastated her “because the delay meant she could have had the baby after all.” McNeal did not sign the brief.

Other notable names are also missing. The brief mentions former Olympic sprinter and four-time gold medalist Sanya Richards-Ross, who revealed in her 2017 memoir Chasing Grace that most female track athletes she knew had had at least one abortion. To her, abortion’s pervasiveness in the sport didn’t make it a good thing.

“Prioritizing athletic goals over the gift of life was the norm,” Richards-Ross wrote, noting many in her sport seemed indifferent about abortion. She aborted her first baby the day before she left for Beijing to compete in the 2008 Summer Games, she says in her book: “I made a decision that broke me, and one from which I would not immediately heal.”

The abortion affected her mentally and physically. She fell short of expectations in some of her races and initially resented her now-husband, football player Aaron Ross, for leaving the decision to her. Richards-Ross wrote that she later discovered the abortion also burdened him: “He believed that our child in 2008 was a blessing we had rejected by always wanting to be in control.”

In a video testimony posted online, Richards-Ross said she had experienced God’s unconditional love and forgiveness even though she had broken God’s command to not kill: “The worst experience of my life, the one that the devil had intended to use to keep me in bondage, in a place of despair and shame, God used to reveal his perfect love.”


Leah Savas

Leah reports on pro-life topics for WORLD Magazine and WORLD Digital. She is a World Journalism Institute and Hillsdale College graduate. Leah resides in Grand Rapids, Mich., with her husband, Stephen.

@leahsavas

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments

Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.


OldMike

TRIC4023, that’s what I think when I hear how “essential” it is for women to have abortion access at any time, and any place. There are a number of preventative measures, including, of course, abstinence. Are “progressive” women trying to say they are incapable of self-control? They only want to control their bodies AFTER sex? Inquiring minds, etc…

TRIC4023

These quotes; “depend on the right to control their bodies and reproductive lives in order to reach their athletic potential.” and “I have honed my body and my mind through my efforts”. So, am I to understand
that these elite female athletes have the ability to control their diet and caloric intake to the nth degree , follow a regimented intense exercise and sport fundamentals program etc, but do not have the ability to follow or utilize readily available birth control methods to prevent pregnancy?

RCRE8109

To Janet B ( I can not get the reply icon to work). My point is that the 500 are an insignificant minority. Their opinion should carry zero weight with any court. I am confident that if the rest of the 178,000 females athletes were allowed a voice on pro-life Mississippi law, the number of women for it, would be in the thousands.

RCRE8109

500? Who cares? There are over 178,000 women athletes participating in the NCAA. 500 is not even one third of one percent, that is ridiculously insignificant. How about getting 10% to file the amicus brief. That would require some 17,800 plus to participate. Otherwise, do not waste the courts time.

Janet BRCRE8109

I care.
Most of the ungodly and harmful policies driving society right now are happening because a minority are demanding them. Abortion as a good thing. Homosexual marriage. Choosing one's gender.
The Supreme Court changed the entire meaning of marriage on the demanding insistence of a very small minority. It is dangerous to think that the shouters will not affect policies just because they are a small group.
We Christians should be on our faces asking forgiveness for letting the shouters win. And perhaps we should shout a bit ourselves.

Vincent BeilerJanet B

Agreed