The World and Everything in It: November 7, 2025

Editor's note: The following text is a transcript of a podcast story. To listen to the story, click on the arrow beneath the headline above.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: Good morning!

The name Nick Fuentes sparks debate among conservatives. Is he a threat or a wake up call?

NICK EICHER, HOST: John Stonestreet’s standing by, we’ll talk about young minds drawn to extremism and how the church can answer it. Culture Friday is ahead.

And apropos of Fuente

CLIP: I’m going to put Hermann Göring on the stand. And I’m going to make him tell the world what he did. So that it can never happen again.

A new film explores humanity’s capacity for evil. WORLD’s Collin Garbarino with a review of Nuremberg.

Later, the sounds of ordinary life in Ukraine.

REICHARD: It’s Friday, November 7th. This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Mary Reichard.

EICHER: And I’m Nick Eicher. Good morning!

REICHARD: It’s time for the news. Here’s Kent Covington.

KENT COVINGTON, NEWS ANCHOR: Flight traffic cutback update » Travelers across the U.S. are facing potential chaos today as federal authorities begin reducing air traffic at 40 airports this morning to help ensure safety. Those include major hubs like Atlanta and Denver.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy:

DUFFY:  We were seeing increased pressure, uh, in these 40 uh, markets, and we looked at the data. This was data driven, and so taking 10% of the flights out, uh, will reduce that pressure, which is what we wanna do.

The move comes amid staffing shortages, with air traffic controllers being asked to work without pay since the government shutdown began more than a month ago.

Allied Pilots Association spokesman Dennis Tajer says the air traffic cutback was the right call.

TAJER: Our airlines plan for mother nature, but they don’t plan for government nature.

And Nick Daniels, the head of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, says the timing of the now longest-ever government shutdown couldn’t have been worse. He said they had a staffing crisis even before the shutdown.

DANIELS: That's why Secretary Duffy and I were so passionate about getting out in front of this, ensuring the long, you know, uh, the, the hiring and supercharging of air traffic control, hiring, uh, also insuring and fixing the equipment. This is putting us in an absolute tailspin.

Concerns are growing now that many Americans could find their Thanksgiving travel plans disrupted if the shutdown does not end soon.

Drug price White House announcement » President Trump has unveiled a deal with drugmakers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk to expand coverage and cut prices for their popular obesity treatments Zepbound and Wegovy.

The drugs are part of a new generation of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity in recent years.

TRUMP:  This will slash the cost of Wegovy from $1,350 a month to ultimately $250 a month, 1003 50 to 250.

Access to the drugs has been a consistent problem for patients because of their cost and spotty insurance coverage.

UPS crash investigation » Federal investigators continue digging for clues as they try to determine what caused Tuesday’s deadly crash of a UPS cargo plane in Kentucky.

National Transportation Safety Board member Todd Inman:

INMAN:  UPS has told us at this time, there were no maintenance work done on the aircraft in question immediately prior to the flight that would delay it in any way, shape, or form.

He said investigators are combing through the maintenance history of the aircraft. And of course, they are also gathering evidence on the ground at the crash site. He said they found multiple pieces of engine fan blades and other engine parts.

Authorities say a wing caught fire and one of the engines fell off, just before the plane crashed on takeoff from Louisville’s international airport.

The explosion sent a fireball and column of black smoke into the sky.

Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg called it horrific and tragic.

GREENBERG:  This was worse than the movies half a mile long standing there where you could just see the destruction, the charred, mangled metal. In some cases, at that point, there were still some smoke rising from piles of debris.

The death toll from the crash has now risen to 13.

SCOTUS says administration can block irregular gender markers » The U.S. Supreme Court is backing, at least for now, a rule that requires passports to list biological sex and not a person’s self-identified gender. WORLD’s Benjamin Eicher has more.

BENJAMIN EICHER: The high court is temporarily upholding Trump administration rule that blocks a lower court decision that would have allowed people identifying as transgender or nonbinary to choose any sex on their passports.

President Trump’s January executive order overturned a Biden-era policy that let applicants select either male or female or choose to list an “X” option.

The court said listing biological sex is simply stating a historical fact — and that is not discrimination.

The ruling keeps the Trump policy in place while lower courts review the case.

The three liberal justices dissented.

They argued the rule could cause fear and anxiety for transgender passport holders.

For WORLD, I’m Benjamin Eicher.

Israel update » A freed Israeli hostage is speaking out about the horrific treatment he says he endured at the hands of Hamas.

Rom Braslavski told Israel Channel 13 his Palestinian captors beat him and sexually abused him.

BRASLAVSKI: [Speaking Hebrew]

He said it's hard for him to talk about, but that they did things even the Nazis didn't do.

Meanwhile, along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon:

SOUND: [Israeli tanks]

Israeli tanks were seen on the move as jets struck three towns in southern Lebanon.

Israeli officials say the target, was the Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah.

Government spokeswoman Shosh Bedrosian:

BEDROSIAN: We will not allow Hezbollah to rearm themselves, to recover, build back up its strength to threaten the state of Israel. And the continuous terrorist activities by Hezbollah constitute a violation of the understanding between the ceasefire.

The Israeli military gave residents advance notice just before the airstrikes, urging them to evacuate.

Pelosi announced retirement » Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says … she plans to call it a career next year. She made the announcement a video message to her constituents in San Francisco.

PELOSI: I will not be seeking reelection to Congress. With a grateful heart, I look forward to my final year of service as your proud representative.

Pelosi joined Congress in 1987 and was elected speaker 20 years later becoming the first woman to hold that position.

The 85-year-old Democrat relinquished her leadership role three years ago.

Cowboys player suicide » Police in a Dallas suburb say 24-year-old Dallas Cowboys defensive end Marshawn Kneeland was found dead Thurday morning of an apparent suicide … after evading authorities in his vehicle and fleeing the scene of an accident on foot.

Police said Kneeland didn’t stop for Texas DPS troopers over a traffic violation on Wednesday night.

Authorities say Marshawn Kneeland had expressed suicidal ideation prior to his death.

I'm Kent Covington.

Straight ahead: the battle for the heart of conservatism on Culture Friday with John Stonestreet. Plus, a trip to the streets of Ukraine.

This is The World and Everything in It.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: It’s Friday, November 7th. Glad to have you along for today’s edition of The World and Everything in It. Good morning, I’m Mary Reichard.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And I’m Nick Eicher. It’s Culture Friday! Joining us is John Stonestreet, president of the Colson Center and host of the Breakpoint podcast, good morning John!

JOHN STONESTREET: Good morning.

EICHER: Two conservative thinkers are warning about the same figure—but for very different reasons.

Thinker 1 is Ross Douthat, writing in The New York Times. He writes that anti-Semitism on the populist right is not a fringe problem anymore.

Douthat argues that figures like Nick Fuentes tap into real theological and generational drift—especially among younger evangelicals. Douthat calls for conservatives to rebuild moral authority, to reassert theological clarity, and to engage young people before skepticism, for example, about Israel hardens into something darker.

I mentioned two conservative thinkers. Thinker No. 2 is Christopher Rufo, writing in City Journal. Rufo writes that everyone’s taking Fuentes too seriously. He calls him a performance artist of the internet age. He says Fuentes is someone who doesn’t believe half of what he says but manipulates outrage to gain attention.

In Rufo’s view, debating or denouncing Fuentes just feeds the spectacle. The only winning move is to starve him of attention and focus on reality instead of online provocation.

So the two agree Fuentes is poisonous—but Douthat says we must engage and correct him; Rufo says we must ignore and outgrow him.

What do you say?

STONESTREET: Well, I don’t know if they can both be right, but I think at some level you have to engage the young men and rebuild some foundation in the young men who seem to be attracted to Nick Fuentes, while at the same time realizing that he is a performance artist and he’s actually, in many ways, not even making arguments—he’s just saying really outrageous things in order to gain an audience.

But the problem that we have here is that the pure strategy of just kind of not making a bigger deal out of this than it really is, and just moving on, would be completely legitimate if we were talking about a different kind of audience. But we’re not. Lewis said, for example, that we need good philosophy, if for no other reason than bad philosophy exists. That would apply here.

But I think there’s actually another step. I just re-watched one of the great movies of all time, Hoosiers, the Indiana basketball movie, when the town guy says to the coach—and of course he ends up being one of the bad guys in the film—but his line is: there are two types of people. There’s the guy who goes crazy, gets naked, and howls at the moon, and then there’s the one who does it in your living room. The one you shouldn’t care about; the other you’re kind of forced to deal with.

We’re a culture in which, in our living room, so to speak, is a bunch of disaffected, untethered, ungrounded, uncatechized young people—particularly young men. One of the things that they’re not real clear on is cultural memory. We have to understand that we at least have the first-generation report, and maybe some of us eyewitness information, of the evils of Nazism and anti-Semitism. We’re now talking about two or three or four generations down the line, in a culture that does a pretty lousy job at teaching history—much less civic loyalties.

And it’s the same thing with Mamdani becoming mayor of New York City. You have a bunch of young people that voted for him. The numbers were crazy from the polls, right? Everybody under 40 and everybody over 40 didn’t—not because they were conservative, they were going to vote for Cuomo. But the point is that one remembers communism and one does not. And if you do not pass down these important cultural memories, then you have a very susceptible audience—and Fuentes clearly has a very susceptible audience.

We saw the text messages that came out of the Young Republicans. Obviously, some people were watching him like they watch a car wreck—you just can’t turn away. There’s plenty of that. But listen, we have to pay attention to it, if for no other reason than that we haven’t paid attention to it up until this point, at least in terms of teaching young men what’s true.

EICHER: I want to return to Douthat’s argument and his engagement with the delicate question about Christian support for Israel. He points out that older evangelicals still tend to see Israel through a theological lens—the “those who bless Israel will be blessed” framework. But many younger conservatives, including younger believers, don’t share that view. They’re more willing to question Israeli policy, especially after the Gaza war.

Douthat warns that without careful teaching, that skepticism can slide from reasonable critique into something darker — from political disagreement to anti-Semitic conspiracy.

So here’s the question: How should Christians critique Israeli policy without drifting into the anti-Semitic conspiracies Douthat warns about? What’s the line between discernment and denial of Israel’s legitimacy

STONESTREET: I mean, look, we got tons of reaction this week to a commentary that I put out along these lines—condemning Fuentes, condemning anti-Semitism on the right, and specifically Tucker Carlson’s soft-pedaling of it through this interview—and we got that immediately: “Oh, you’re just a dispensationalist.”

Now, for the record, some of my best friends are dispensationalists, but I am not one of them. And so that particular view of theology or the End Times is not required whatsoever to have a favorable position on the State of Israel.

Let me just say clearly, there is an enormous gap—a Grand Canyon-size chasm—between the things that Fuentes says about Jewish people as Jewish people, and a hatred of individuals that has nothing to do at all with whatever one thinks about particular policies, or even whether they overdid it in Gaza. And we immediately got that sort of reaction as well: “Well, listen, if you’re accusing Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson of anti-Semitism, then you are completely uncritical of the State of Israel.”

I’m like, What are we even talking about? Listen, the difference between saying, “You know what, these sorts of actions or the level of retaliation by the State of Israel is a problem with the world,” and saying, “Jewish people as people are the problem with the world,” is an enormous gap. And that’s what you get from anti-Semitism—whether it’s on the critical-theory left or whether it’s coming from this kind of far-right basement faction of that side of things—because you’re not answering the question of what’s wrong with the world with a “who.”

But the line of good and evil doesn’t run between nations or groups of people or states—it runs right between the human heart. But it’s worse, because you’re identifying a particular grouping of people and then saying that the world would be better and there would not be these problems if only these people did not exist. That’s hatred. That’s violating the tenets of the Western world, which is built on an understanding of human dignity and human value.

So I just think these things are so dramatically different—criticizing Israel’s policy and then saying the world would be better if there were no Jewish people and mocking in that way. And let’s also be clear too, Fuentes has never reserved his juvenile, thoughtless, cruel, and just flat-out evil rhetoric just for Jews. If that’s the only evidence that we had, he would be guilty on dozens and dozens of counts. But what he’s said about Blacks, what he’s said about women, what he’s said about conservatives who disagree with him, what he says about everything—yeah.

REICHARD: Yeah, well, I don’t want to leave Rufo in the dust here. I want to give him his due. So let’s talk a bit about the argument that Nick Fuentes isn’t really driven by conviction at all but by provocation, as you said. In other words, when society says something over here is just forbidden instead of saying something over here is false, then it makes that taboo more alluring to some personalities—let’s just say it that way.

So that raises a challenge for the church: How does the church form believers who reject anti-Semitism not just because it’s taboo—which just feeds into that rebel impulse—but because it is false, unbiblical, and contrary to reality? John, how do we ground that conviction deeply enough that it can withstand both outrage and irony?

STONESTREET: Yeah, well, listen, I think Rufo does deserve some credit here for this really important point. I mean, Fuentes is a showman. He wrecks cars in the middle of the media sphere so that everyone will stop and look at the car wreck. But I still think he has pretty committed convictions about race, about the Jewish people, about women, and so on.

So how do we respond? Number one, I think we start where any sort of catechism on human dignity and human value starts, which is: Where can you ground it? You can’t ground it in a particular ideology. You have to ground it in timeless, eternal truth. And the only system that has ever given that is the Judeo-Christian vision communicated in Genesis—that we were created a particular way with inherent value.

Now I think if we went from church to church to church today and we asked people, “Hey, everybody, fill in the blank: humans are …” everyone would probably say, “ …the image of God,” like they should. But if you said, “Well, what does that mean? What is the image of God? What difference does the image of God make?” you’d hear a lot more crickets.

So we need to actually turn the image of God into deep catechism and formation, as opposed to just a trivia point of quoting a verse in Genesis. We’ve got to teach that.

Second, to go back to a point we were making earlier, we have to teach history. I have a friend who works with us—Dr. Glenn Sunshine at the Colson Center—and he said, as a historian, “I cannot explain the survival of the Jewish people.” The conspiracies that some group of people just called themselves Jewish so they could claim the land? Look at the history of persecution against the Jewish people—who would suddenly say, “That’s who I want to be”? There’s no explanation why this isn’t an extinct people group like so many others through history unless something else is going on.

So I think the Biblical story in which the Jewish people have a very unique and specific role—and again, I say this as someone whose best friends are dispensationalists, but I am not one of them—explains both the hatred and also the survival. So give me theological grounding, give me historical fact, and I think we’re going to be a lot further down the line.

And then finally, we need to look at the unique way that this attracts young men. It is a fascinating time we live in—if it weren’t so consequential—that we have a flow of young men back to church and a flow of young men to ideological extremism like this, and sometimes it’s the same men going both directions. So we need to be really clear about how we disciple, how we clarify the expectations that God has put on young men to lay down their lives, to love their neighbor as themselves. I think we have to raise the bar there.

So if we did those three things, that probably would help, I think.

REICHARD: John Stonestreet is president of the Colson Center and host of the Breakpoint podcast. Thank you, John.

STONESTREET: Thank you both.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: Today is Friday, November 7th. Thank you for turning to WORLD Radio to help start your day.

Good morning. I’m Mary Reichard.

NICK EICHER, HOST:And I’m Nick Eicher.

Coming next on The World and Everything in It: a new film that puts evil on the witness stand. The film Nuremberg hits theaters this weekend, retelling the moment when the victors had to define justice—and live by it.

Here’s WORLD arts and culture editor Collin Garbarino.

COLLIN GARBARINO: Back when I was a history professor, I used to teach the second half of Western Civilization. At the end of the course, I usually asked my students which historical person they would most want to meet and why. A surprising number said Adolf Hitler. These kids weren’t crypto-Nazis. They just wanted to know what had made Hitler so evil. They felt he must have had some deep-seated trauma that turned him bad. I always found it amusing that these 18-year-olds had so much confidence in their own skills of psychoanalysis.

Even so, the question of how the Nazi regime could perpetrate such monstrous evils really does haunt us. During World War II, many people in allied countries couldn’t believe the rumors of atrocities. The reports seemed too horrible. And as the war fades from living memory, some people have forgotten how cruel humans can be to one another.

ANNOUNCER: Dateline Nuremberg. As dark rumors continue to swirl about the true purpose of the Nazi work camps, the legal teams are assembling for what promises to be the trial of the century.

The historical drama Nuremberg reminds us of humanity’s potential for brutality and echoes my students’ question.

KELLEY: What if we could dissect evil? What sets these men apart from all others? What enabled them to commit the crimes that they did?

The film begins on the last day of the war in Europe, with the capture of Hitler’s designated successor in the Nazi chain of command.

OFFICER: Hermann Göring?

GÖRING: I am Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring.

Göring is played by Academy Award–winner Russel Crowe. The Allies are trying to figure out what to do with him. Most of the military brass prefer the idea of simply shooting him, but U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, played by the wonderful Michael Shannon, wants to put Göring and the other captured Nazis on trial.

JACKSON: If we just shoot these men, we make them martyrs. I’m not going to allow that to happen. There will be no statues to them. No songs of praise.

Army psychiatrist Doug Kelley, played by Rami Malek, is tasked with making sure the prisoners stay mentally fit and don’t commit suicide.

COLONEL BURTON C. ANDRUS: The one you’ll have to watch the closest is Göring.

DOUGLAS KELLEY: Göring? As in Hermann Göring?

ANDRUS: That’s the one.

KELLEY: Hermann Göring’s here?

These two storylines—that of the lawyer and the psychiatrist—start to converge toward the film’s climax. The first storyline follows the difficulties Justice Jackson has in prosecuting the Nazi leadership. No one had ever attempted anything like this before.

ELSIE: It can’t be done.

ROBERT H. JACKSON: Give me one good reason why not.

ELSIE: There’s no legal precedent for a trial. There’s no international law to base the charges on.

It wasn’t feasible to try these men in a German court, but what legal authority would an international tribunal have? And if they did get to trial what would they be accused of? The Nazis would be tried in a legal limbo with case law that hadn’t been written yet.

Moreover, putting the Nazis on trial was a bit of a gamble. Would it be possible for them to successfully plead their innocence? In televising the proceedings, were the Allies running the risk of portraying these men as sympathetic victims? Or worse yet, were the Allies giving the Nazis yet another opportunity to infect the world with their anti-Semitic hatred.

The other storyline involves Doug Kelley’s interactions with the Nazi prisoners, especially his relationship with Göring.

HERMANN GÖRING: I will show you a magic trick one day.

KELLEY: What’s that?

GÖRING: I am going to escape the hangman’s noose.

The psychiatrist takes his job as prison doctor seriously, looking after both the physical and mental health of the Nazis. But on some level he starts to become ensnared by Göring’s charisma.

KELLEY: How do you plan on doing that?

GÖRING: If I were to tell you, it would not be a trick.

Kelley hopes to write a book about his experience to gain money and career capital. He wants to psychologically define evil, and he’s essentially asking the same question my students did: What makes these Nazis different from us? Kelley views evil as a pathology that must be explained away.

Göring makes for a fascinating figure, and Crowe hypnotizes us with his performance—his Göring is simultaneously gregarious and malevolent.

Seeing the proud figure humbled in prison elicits sympathy from both Kelley and the audience. But clarity comes when Justice Jackson’s Nuremberg trial cuts through the manipulation and sentimentality.

JACKSON: I’m going to put Hermann Göring on the stand. And I’m going to make him tell the world what he did. So that it can never happen again.

Part of the brilliance of Nuremberg is that it doesn’t merely depict Nazi atrocities. We’ve been confronted with those images in countless films. In fact, the sheer number of World War II movies tends to numb us to the terrible reality. In this film, we see the characters discover for the first time the extent of the horror, their realization that humans could engage in such atrocities, the characters’ reactions to these sickening images arouses a greater reaction in the us than the images might have created on their own.

But what about that nagging question?

KELLEY: What makes the Germans different?

TRIEST: Different?

KELLEY: From us?

Kelley the psychiatrist, and by extension the film, eventually arrives at the Biblical answer. The Nazis aren’t any different from you or me. They were evil because they were human.

ROBERT H. JACKSON: The world needs to know what these men did.

We’re fooling ourselves if we think that 80 years later sin no longer crouches at our own doors.

I’m Collin Garbarino.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Today is Friday, November 7th. Good morning! This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Nick Eicher.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: And I’m Mary Reichard. Finally today, the sound of life in a war zone. WORLD’s Caleb Welde brings us the sounds and silences of a country learning to live with war.

SOUND: [SIRENS BEGIN]

CALEB WELDE: I’m in southwest Ukraine. Three hundred and fifty miles from the closest frontlines. The people waiting at the crosswalks don’t react to the sirens. A woman pushing a stroller appears unfazed. One woman does pick up the pace but it looks like she’s just waving down a taxi.

SOUND: [SIRENS WINDING DOWN]

In what world do air raid sirens mix with elegant, pastel cities? Chernivtsi’s downtown reminds me of Austria. For good reason. This city was once part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

WELDE: The 6:40PM test?

I ask the people next to me if this is a test. I don’t understand why no one reacts.

SOUND: [SIRENS]

Maybe it’s because this has been their world for almost four years now. Nowadays, if people are really concerned they can check certain Telegram channels to see specifically what’s headed for them. Drones, missiles, or jets. I’m told jets are the least worrying. Sirens go off this night in every region of Ukraine. All twenty-four of them. In some places, in the early evening, like here in other places multiple times in the middle of the night.

SOUNDS: [STREET ACTIVITY]

The next morning, I’m again in Chernivtsi’s central square. It’s a few minutes before nine. People are gathering outside the shops and lining the edges of the square. Every city in Ukraine observes a 9AM moment of silence every day.

Police officers stand in the road blocking every lane of traffic. Heads bowed, hats in hand. Many of the drivers behind them are also out of their cars standing and bowing.

AUDIO: [MAN SPEAKING UKRAINIAN OVER LOUDSPEAKER]

Seven officers stand shoulder-to-shoulder below a towering mural of a Ukrainian flag. To the right of the officers are pictures of more than a hundred local soldiers killed.

SOUND: [BELLS TOLLING]

A dog walks through the main intersection. He’s the only thing moving.

SOUMD: [PRAYER SONG BEGINS]

I’m standing with Sergey Rakuba—head of the Christian non-profit Mission Eurasia.

RAKHUBA: This is their anthem, but this is an anthem in the form of prayer. Faithful God, protect, defend, take care of our country.

It’s not the national anthem but it’s been a favorite here since 1885.

The song continues: “Bless us with freedom, bless us with wisdom. Guide us … into a kind world.”

After Chernivtsi, I meet a pastor in Lviv–another Austrian-looking city five-hundred miles from the front lines. Twelve people were killed a hundred and fifty yards from the pastor’s apartment here. Walking together downtown, we pass a statue encased in steel to protect it from shelling. A sign on it says, “We’ll see the original after the victory.”

It’s symbolic of so many things here. Pastor Pavel says the sign reminds him of a passage in the Bible. In his words, “the one about how we might not see clearly now but one day we will.” In the meantime, the people of Ukraine continue on. Longing to see the original revealed. The kind world, as it was made to be.

For WORLD, I’m Caleb Welde.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: It’s time to name the crew who put the week’s programs together:

David Bahnsen, Hunter Baker, Myrna Brown, Emma Eicher, Juliana Chan Erikson, Collin Garbarino, Travis Kircher, Carolina Lumetta, Onize Oduah, Elisa Palumbo, Josh Schumacher, John Stonestreet, Cal Thomas, Seth Trout, Andrew Walker, and Caleb Welde.

Thanks also to our breaking news crew: Kent Covington, Daniel Devine, Christina Grube, and Steve Kloosterman.

And thanks to the Moonlight Maestros, working in the dark of night so the program’s ready bright and early: Benj Eicher and Carl Peetz.

Harrison Watters is Washington producer, Kristen Flavin is features editor, Paul Butler is executive producer, and Les Sillars is editor-in-chief. I’m Mary Reichard.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And I’m Nick Eicher.

If you enjoy this podcast, help a friend find it, too. Send a link to a favorite story or the whole podcast right from your app. One click helps a friend start the day the way you do … and helps make the program grow.

The World and Everything in It comes to you from WORLD Radio.

WORLD’s mission is Biblically objective journalism that informs, educates, and inspires.

The Bible says, “Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.” First Corinthians 13:4-7

We’re expecting Myrna back from her overseas trip next week, so, again, it falls to me to remind you that Sunday’s coming! So make plans to worship with a Bible-believing church on the Lord’s Day.

And Lord willing, we’ll be right back here Monday morning.

Go now in grace and peace.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.