The World and Everything in It: November 14, 2025

Editor's note: The following text is a transcript of a podcast story. To listen to the story, click on the arrow beneath the headline above.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: Good morning!

Critical theory is reshaping young women—but the Christian answer is not to prefer the masculine to the feminine.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Coming up: Culture Friday with Katie McCoy.

Also: two movies turning 75 that tackle the high cost of fame.

CLIP: So many people know me. I wish I did. I wish someone would tell me about me.

And a little Word Play-ism for November: George Grant later on.

BROWN: It’s Friday, November 14th. This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Myrna Brown.

EICHER: And I’m Nick Eicher. Good morning!

BROWN: Up next, Kent Covington with today’s news.

KENT COVINGTON, NEWS ANCHOR: Federal workers back on the job » The government is once again open for business and federal workers are back on the job, but for how long?

The current funding package will last through the holidays, but it’s set to expire at the end of January. Republican Congresswoman Laurel Lee:

LEE:  We just saw how terrible this is for the American people and how many people are affected. You know, most Americans can't just float a paycheck.

She says she does not believe the government will shut down again at the end of January or anytime soon.

But the tone is not exactly harmonious on Capitol Hill.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democrats held a news conference Thursday slamming the deal that ended the shutdown.

JEFFRIES:  House Democrats are here on the capital steps to reiterate our strong opposition to the spending bill because it fails to address the Republican healthcare crisis and it fails to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits.

But the eight Senate Democrats who crossed the aisle and broke the filibuster to pass the funding bill see it differently. They agree with Jeffries that Obamacare tax credits should be extended, but they did not believe that keeping the government shut down was going to force Republicans to agree to that.

But debate on those healthcare issues will now begin. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has promised a vote on the matter on the Senate floor next month.

Economic reports » And while the record-long shutdown is over, Americans continue to feel its effects.

Kevin Hassett is the director of the National Economic Council. He told reporters outside the White House.

HASSETT:  Well, our, our Council of Economic Advisors said that it cost about 15 billion, uh, a week, uh, and it accumulates to maybe one, 1.5% of GDP DP with the account for multiplier effects.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office also estimates that a six-week shutdown will reduce growth in this year’s fourth quarter by about 1.5 percentage points.

Hassett said the National Economic Council also estimates that 60,000 Americans — not including government workers — have lost their jobs because of the reduced economic output.

Beyond that, the full impact will take months to measure. About 1.25 million federal workers haven’t been paid since Oct. 1.

Flight traffic / TSA agents » Among those workers who missed paychecks were TSA agents at airports across the country.

And Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem says now that the government has reopened:

NOEM:  We are going to not only continue their paychecks like they should have received all along, but also they're going to get a bonus check for stepping up, taking on extra shifts for showing up each and every day for serving the American people.

And more air traffic controllers are coming back to work. With that in mind, the FAA has paused plans to further cut back flight capacities at 40 major airports.

Authorities ordered airlines to cut air traffic by 6% over safety concerns and had planned to expand that to 10%.

The FAA says it will now evaluate the data and see when air traffic can return to normal.

Ukraine » In Ukraine:

SOUND: [Ukraine missiles]

Kyiv's conflict with Moscow rages on, as Ukraine says it fired new domestically produced missiles at several Russian targets.

In Brussels, the European Union’s Commissioner for Economy, Valdis Dombrovskis called for Europe to stand united behind a plan to use frozen Russian assets to assist Ukraine.

DOMBROVSKIS: It has to be said that there are always risks associated with action and with containing the aggressor, but the risks of inaction and not containing the aggressor are even greater.

But European leaders also had some strong words for Ukraine, saying Kyiv must do more to crack down on government corruption.

That came after Ukrainian authorities this week arrested five people and identified seven others in what they are calling a major corruption investigation, involving Ukraine’s state nuclear energy company.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was quick to respond.

ZELENSKYY: [Speaking Ukrainian]

He called for the resignation of the justice minister and the energy ministers allegedly involved.

But top government officials and associates close to Zelenskyy are also said to be among those implicated in the scandal. None of the suspects, however, have been publicly identified.

Florida migrant operation » Homeland Security officials have announced the arrest of hundreds of illegal migrants in the state of Florida as part of a massive sweep.

ICE Deputy Director Madison Sheahan:

SHEAHAN:  In just 10 days, we've been able to remove in partnership with the state of Florida over 230 of the worst of the worst heinous criminals from their streets.

The sweep was dubbed "Operation Dirtbag." It targeted illegal immigrants wanted for crimes including sexual assault, drug offenses, and even murder.

And Sheahan said that more than 150 of those arrested had prior convictions for sexual assault and child molestation.

She added that she hopes the state of Florida’s cooperation with ICE can serve as a model for the rest of the country.

Border apprehensions lowest in half-century » Meantime, at the US southern border, apprehensions have dropped to their lowest level in more than half-century. WORLD’s Benjamin Eicher has that story.

BENJAMIN EICHER: Homeland Security reports fewer than 240,000 intercepts between Oct. 1st of last year and Sept. 30th of this year.

That is the lowest annual total since 1970.

Officials say tougher enforcement and new technology have helped cut way down on crossings, with fewer than 8,500 arrests in September. That was down more than 80 percent from a year earlier.

Some analysts contend that seasonal patterns and conditions in Latin America may also at least partially explain the drop. But the latest figures stand in stark contrast to record-highs under the previous administration.

Homeland Security officials add that maritime drug-smuggling activity has increased as criminal networks adapt. The Coast Guard seized nearly $4 billion in cocaine this year across the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

For WORLD, I’m Benjamin Eicher.

I'm Kent Covington.

Straight ahead: Culture Friday with Katie McCoy. Plus, the allure of fame is nothing new: A review of a couple movies from 1950 that speak loudly to today’s generation.

This is The World and Everything in It.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: It’s Friday, November 14th.

Glad to have you along for today’s edition of The World and Everything in It. Good morning, I’m Myrna Brown.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And I’m Nick Eicher. It’s Culture Friday! Joining us is author, speaker, Katie McCoy. Good morning Katie!

KATIE MCCOY: Good morning, Nick and Myrna.

EICHER: There’s a viral essay in Compact magazine that has stirred a lot of debate … and claiming to explain the real engine powering today’s woke culture. Writer Helen Andrews says it isn’t ideology at all—it’s demographics. Specifically, it’s what happens when women become the majority in powerful institutions. She makes the point … and I’m quoting Helen Andrews here … she writes that when fields like law, medicine, and journalism tipped female, they took on what she calls feminine traits: namely, she says, empathy over logic, safety over risk, consensus over confrontation.

She labels this the “great feminization” of American life and warns it could threaten open debate, meritocracy, and even the rule of law.

So Katie, you studied all the waves of feminism, do you think the Andrews argument is fair? Or is she missing something, blaming women for cultural changes that have deeper causes?

MCCOY: It’s a thought-provoking theory, but at the base of it, I think that she’s confusing or conflating the symptoms of a cultural malady with the diagnosis of that cultural malady.

Now the things that she brings up are observationally true. You can look back, especially in second-wave feminism, 1960s and 70s. First of all, it metastasized in the academy, and then it spread to a woman-centered view of specific disciplines, like medicine, law, history, etc.

The problem comes when she’s denying the connection to Marxism, and she does so in an absolute black-and-white way that’s just not historically or philosophically accurate. At the core of feminist theory, which is what this author is criticizing—at least the effects of it—is critical theory. It’s just critical theory applied to gender. That’s what effectively feminism is.

So the diagnosis, according to critical theory, of the problem of humanity: it’s all a matter of power. Who has it, who doesn’t, who should have it, who shouldn’t. Running underneath all of it is conflict.

Now, with that in mind, let’s think through what she was arguing in this essay. What she describes is grounded in feminist critical theory—not the presence of females, but the deconstruction and then demonization of masculinity and the replacing of it as a dominant influence with a new dominant influence, which is the feminization of humanity. Right there at the core of it is conflict.

What she does is identifies the symptoms. Now those symptoms are valid. But here’s the irony, Nick: when you really get into her argument, the irony of her theory is that her solution appears to be just continue the problem the opposite direction. She says we need to just change which gender, and then consequently, which gendered characteristics, are dominant in that power dynamic of society. That’s not going to fix the problem.

So what should the solution be as we come across ideas like this? Well, the solution is recognizing that innate gender differences, rightly ordered and expressed, have a created design behind them—that God’s design for male and female in his image is very good, Genesis says. And then when we are aligned with the intent of that design, from our relationship with our Creator, then our relationship in our other human relationships, and then consequently society writ large, will be in harmony.

BROWN: Okay, I’m sure we’re going to come back to this, but let’s pivot just a bit from the great feminization to the radicalization of young women.

So let’s talk about exit polls and what they reveal about young Christian women. David Mitzenmacher wrote a stunningly powerful piece on what he calls the radicalization of young women, and there are several excerpts that just struck me.

So let’s talk about the exit polls from last Tuesday’s election, and I’m wondering, Katie, what do they say about young women?

MCCOY: Effectively, we are seeing all the chickens come home to roost, because now we have two generations since second-wave feminism, the sexual revolution that happened concurrently with that, where the message that women were told is it is effectively all about you. It is all about your experience. Your experience is authoritative over every other source of authority, including Scripture, including indeed nature itself.

That the pursuit of your happiness is your deepest and most precious pursuit, and anything that would be getting in the way is not just in the way, but it is oppressive. And so what you have is a culture that has constantly told women that if you don’t want to have a baby right now, you shouldn’t have to. In fact, anyone that will be pushing that on you is part of the problem that goes all the way back to the patriarchy.

Here we are again: critical theory, gender conflict, all of this stuff. You could put it in a big pot of soup and you just let it simmer. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing.

Women drawn to—this article notes things we’ve talked about—that young men are trending more ideologically right, young women are trending more ideologically left. And part of that, I believe, is that as women are less and less connected to family life, they are more self-identifying with a political cause. You can go read Mary Eberstadt’s Primal Screams for some research on this.

But identity politics is taking the place of God, religion, family, and all of the ordering principles and priorities that those relationships bring. So as a result, if your happiness and your political alignment are the most foundational aspects of your identity, then you are going to protect them. And you’re going to privilege and prioritize them over and against everything that Scripture says, everything that Christianity espouses, and everything that your church teaches you.

EICHER: Katie, I want to return to a theme inspired by Helen Andrews.

In a recent piece in the Free Press, Bari Weiss invited several women to weigh in, including former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, from the first Trump term—and I wanted to call particular attention to her.

DeVos warned about compassion becoming unmoored from justice—feelings elevated over facts—and said that mindset leads to Title IX–style injustices she witnessed firsthand.

So in Christian terms, Katie, how do we hold mercy and truth together?

MCCOY: When former Secretary DeVos gave her response, it was so perfect that she cited Micah 6:8, because that is an organizing verse for so many of us when we think about who we should be in society—that we would do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God.

And we see, whether it’s from all the way back in the Pentateuch, the book of Deuteronomy, to the book of Acts, to the model of the early church, we see this pattern that justice and mercy go together in God’s people in the ministry that they have to others who don’t know Him.

Why? Because every human being’s value comes from being an image bearer of God. We see in the early church that they were taking care of the poor and they were proclaiming a biblical sexual ethic. These things don’t have to be in conflict with each other. In fact, they shouldn’t.

In fact, I’ll go even further, Nick, and say that if they are, then we as God’s people are looking a lot more like the world than we are the church.

BROWN: One more question for you, Katie. What risks arise when cultural debates about gender spill into theology—when traits coded masculine or feminine get moralized as good or bad?

MCCOY: Yeah, so when we think about typical male or masculine traits, typical female or feminine traits, when we start talking about which one is intrinsically more moral or more virtuous, I hope that we know more than to do that.

But let’s talk about what’s wrong with that. First of all, when you look at Scripture, the primary goal of every human being is to know and glorify God. We do that as male or female, but virtue is not gendered.

In fact, in the whole scheme of Scripture, there are not that many gendered passages, and the ones that are deal with our relationships to each other, and that is part of how we express our discipleship. But the idea that certain virtues are gendered—that goes against the teaching of Scripture.

For instance, we’re all called to be gentle. Now we express that gentleness according to our design. If a man has courage, a woman has courage—is that going to look and be expressed differently? I think it can.

So here’s how I think we should think about this. When we’re talking about characteristics between men and women, we often think about them as a seesaw. We’re trying to keep this right balance. But it’s not a seesaw. A seesaw is precarious. The slightest move and you throw it off balance.

I want us to think more about the relationship between male and female characteristics not as a seesaw but as a jungle gym. A jungle gym is bolted into the ground. A jungle gym has a foundation. You’re using something to dig it into the earth. It has a foundation that is not going to move, and it’s not going to change with the wind.

With that foundation—upon that foundation—we build our sense of what it means to be male and female. That foundation is nature and Scripture, or what we call general revelation and special revelation.

So if we were to just shift to hammering sins that are more typically associated with women—like gossip, manipulation, codependency, immodesty—if we just shift and make some kind of overcorrection, well then we’re right back to viewing the problem as one of balance rather than foundation.

The last paragraph of Mitzenmacher’s article hits the nail on the head. He takes seriously the foundation of forming women’s discipleship—that is calling them upward, calling them to fulfill their purpose, that is grounded in who they are as morally accounted image bearers of God.

That’s not seeing male/female as a seesaw. That’s seeing male and female as grounded in the foundation of God’s created design. And we build upon that as we are growing in virtue and growing into the character of Christ.

EICHER: Author and speaker Katie McCoy. Always a pleasure.

MCCOY: Hey, thanks for having me.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: Today is Friday, November 14th.

Thank you for turning to WORLD Radio to help start your day.

Good morning. I’m Myrna Brown.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And I’m Nick Eicher.

Coming next on The World and Everything in It: two old Hollywood films that proved every spotlight casts a shadow.

BROWN: WORLD film critic Max Belz takes us back to 1950—a year when the movie business turned the camera on itself and didn’t blink.

MAX BELZ: First up is Sunset Boulevard—directed and co-written by Billy Wilder.

CLIP: As I drove back towards town I took inventory of my prospects. They now added up to exactly zero.

William Holden plays Joe Gillis—a struggling screenwriter. We learn right off the bat that even though he is the narrator of the movie, he is dead in a swimming pool. This detail is troubling but it pokes fun at the all-knowing role of the narrator in older movies.

The rest of the movie is a flashback of Joe’s story: He can’t find work and is on the run from the repo man. During a car chase, he blows a tire and pulls into the garage of an eerie mansion.

CLIP: It was a great big white elephant of a place. The kind crazy movie people built in the crazy 20s. A neglected house gets an unhappy look. This one had it in spades.

The house belongs to the silent movie star Norma Desmond—a forgotten icon of time past, surrounded by portraits of herself. When Joe arrives, she’s burying her pet chimpanzee. She is eccentric and mesmerizing.

CLIP: You’re Norma Desmond. Used to be in silent pictures. Used to be big. I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.

Norma is desperate. She wants to get back on the big screen and wants to be loved again. Joe is desperate to make money. So they strike a deal: Desmond hires Gillis to write a screenplay for her. She’s planning a comeback and bends the ear of legendary director Cecil B. DeMille about teaming back up. Though she is an aged star, she clings to the hope of a second chance that never comes.

CLIP: A dozen press agents working overtime can do terrible things to the human spirit.

Norma insists that Joe stay in the old house as a guest and she spoils him with clothes and unrequited attention, but stifles him with her neediness.

As a result, he sneaks away at night to write his own scripts…but as if pulled back by a mysterious power, returns to Norma, setting up a dramatic and memorable ending.

CLIP: You see this is my life. It always will be. There’s nothing else. Just us. The cameras and those wonderful people out there in the dark.

Sunset Boulevard is in the American Film Institute’s top 100. It shows the flimsiness of fame, both in the audience’s tawdry appetite and the performers’ vainglory. It’s striking too that the director Billy Wilder immigrated to the US as an adult and so accurately lampooned American celebrity culture.

Another movie from 1950 that took on the problem of fame was All About Eve, written and directed by Joseph Mankiewicz.

CLIP: Margo is a great star, a true star. She never was or will be anything less or anything else.

If Sunset Boulevard is about regaining star status, All About Eve is about characters competing for it.

Here we have Bette Davis as Margo Channing, a brassy stage veteran.

CLIP: Fasten your seatbelts. It’s going to be a bumpy night.

One night a fan named Eve finds her way into Margo’s dressing room to meet her hero. Eve wins over everyone in the room, but she has designs of her own.

CLIP: She’s quite a girl, this What’s-Her-Name. Eve. I’ve forgotten they grew that way.

Her devotion to Margo is ingratiating and Margo is put off by Eve’s meddling.

CLIP: Like she’s studying you. Like you was a play or a book or a set of blueprints. How you walk, talk, eat, think. I’m sure that’s very flattering, Birdie. I’m sure there’s nothing wrong with it.

Once Margo turns on Eve, the verbal exchanges are barbed and intricate. In fact, the whole movie is visually plain but dense with dialogue.

CLIP: The gentle atmosphere is very MacBethish. What has or is about to happen? What is he talking about? MacBeth. We know you. We’ve seen you like this before. Is it over or is it just beginning?

Eve worms her way into the theater as Margo’s understudy. But her disguise as a kind person gives way, revealing a brutal, scheming person underneath.

Meanwhile, Margo is going through a transformation of her own.

CLIP: Week after week to thousands of people you’re as young as you want. As young as they want, you mean. I’m not interested, but a thousand of people think I’m 6 or 600.

She feels her age and ponders life beyond the stage with her long-time boyfriend. Her volatility toward Eve is fueled by jealousy. But her career outlook changes because all the years of performing have estranged her from herself.

CLIP: So many people know me. I wish I did. I wish somebody would tell me about me. You’re Margo. Just Margo.

Both the audience and the actor fall for the vanity of fame because of its allure. And worst of all, the glory of fame is a cheap stand-in for love. In Sunset Boulevard, Norma wants to get back that wash of applause. All About Eve shows that Eve will sacrifice anything to get it. And Margo simply wants to live again.

CLIP: Funny business, a woman’s career. The things you drop on your way up the ladder so you can move faster. You forget you need them again when you get back to being a woman. It’s one career all females have in common whether we like it or not: being a woman.

Margo lost touch with herself and risked losing a future of security and love. All About Eve shows us that fame is like a vapor and that trying to seize it is like chasing a ghost. None of these characters can find permanence in fame, and it’s their paths towards or away from it that make these beautifully written movies such classics.

I’m Max Belz.

NICK EICHER, HOST: I’m Nick Eicher.

Next up on The World and Everything in It, a quick preview of a special weekend edition of the program.

WORLD contributor Hunter Baker recently had the opportunity to chat with author, pastor, and podcaster Doug Wilson. The conversation touched on everything from Christian education and cultural renewal…to the role of the pastor in provoking the believer and unbeliever to proper thinking about God.

BROWN: In this clip, Wilson defends so-called “cultural Christianity” while calling the Church to go deeper.

DOUG WILSON: I would say two cheers for cultural Christianity, right? When you have cultural Mayberry Christianity, or you could produce something like the Andy Griffith Show unironically in that era, and you say, well, that's not going to get you into heaven. Yeah, that's true. That's not going to get you into heaven, but it does keep away the drag queen story hours. It does keep away the pride parades. It does keep away millions of abortions. There are common grace blessings that flow out of that.

And it's the preacher's job, to keep people stirred up in a nominally Christian setting, you know, the people who will really pin your ears back. The Ray Comfort sort of approach. What do you think you're doing? Paul Washer, what do you think you're doing? And that's always necessary. Chesterton once said that Satan fell by the force of gravity. Once you have anything that works, it's going to start to settle. You have the flood, and then the sediment goes to the bottom, and it's the preacher's job to do something about that.

BROWN: Join us tomorrow for the full 45-minute conversation on The World and Everything in It podcast feed, wherever you listen to the program.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And finally today, we end the week with our monthly feature: Word Play. George Grant has been thinking a lot recently of the many “isms” that have found their way into our daily vocabulary.

GEORGE GRANT: Politics tends to be a jargon factory. Shorthand labels, often pejorative, sometimes defensive, and only rarely descriptive are invented and deployed as a kind of vocabulary artillery. As you might expect though, all too often this war of words becomes a war on words. Political fractiousness becomes frightfully more divisive when our vocabulary loses definition, and our words are weaponized.

During the Cold War a host of ideological “isms” passed into our common parlance: Communism and Socialism were pitted against Capitalism and Mercantilism. Liberalism squared off against Conservatism. The West was derided for its Imperialism, Consumerism, Individualism, and Materialism. The East was derided for its Despotism, Absolutism, Authoritarianism, and Totalitarianism.

Some ideologies have splinted into rival camps: Bolshevism against Menshevism, Stalinism against Trotskyism, Economic Marxism against Cultural Marxism. Then there is International Socialism against National Socialism against Democratic Socialism against Fabian Socialism against Baathist Socialism.

We are buffeted today by the competing claims of Populism, Progressivism, and Scientism opposing Classicism, Traditionalism, and Moralism. Environmentalism and Feminism stand in contradistinction to Industrialism and Patriarchalism.

There are of course plenty of “isms” that are not at all ideological. Instead, they describe movements or philosophies, or theologies: Antinomianism, Deism, Universalism, Gnosticism, Mysticism, and Unitarianism or Presbyterianism, Dispensationalism, Preterism, Fundamentalism, Evangelicalism, and Covenantalism. Some “isms” merely describe a mood, an affection, or a frame of mind: Pragmatism, Rationalism, Absurdism, and Syncretism or Sentimentalism, Idealism, Catastrophism, and Hedonism.

A few recently coined “isms” have burst forth from the blogosphere into our common slang parlance including Mamdanimalism and MAGAism, Broligarchism and Six-Sevenism, Deluluism and Skibidism.

Admittedly, these “isms” remind us that shorthand labels can serve as useful descriptors, categorizers, and identifiers—but only if they are applied accurately. All too often, disconnected from original meanings and historical contexts some of these “isms” are used as mere epithets. The result is that they now profligately pepper our social media posts, podcasts, and stump speeches: Fascism and Wokism, Nazism and Christian Nationalism, Colonialism and Corporatism.

Sometimes our misuse of “isms” is just verbal or intellectual sloppiness. As Ernest Yeboah has said, “We choose to say the wrong words because we fail to think of the right words.” But sometimes, he asserted, our misuse of “isms” is more malicious, “We fail to say the right words because we choose the wrong words.”

Either way, Mark Twain’s observation is a helpful corrective, “The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter. ‘Tis the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.”

I’m George Grant.

NICK EICHER, HOST: It’s time to name the crew who put the week’s programs together:

Steve West, Cal Thomas, Jeff Palamino, Arsenio Orteza, Onize Oduah, Mary Muncy, Lindsay Mast, Carolina Lumetta, Juliana Chan Erikson, Mary Reichard, Emma Eicher, Janie B. Cheaney, Katie McCoy, Max Belz, Hunter Baker, David Bahnsen, and Maria Baer.

Thanks also to our breaking news crew: Steve Kloosterman, Travis Kircher, Christina Grube, Daniel Devine, and Kent Covington.

And thanks to the Moonlight Maestros, working in the dark of night so the program’s ready bright and early: Carl Peetz and Benj Eicher…

Harrison Watters is Washington producer, Kristen Flavin is features editor, Paul Butler is executive producer, and Les Sillars is editor-in-chief. I’m Nick Eicher.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: And I’m Myrna Brown.

If you enjoy this podcast, help a friend find it, too. Send a link to a favorite story or the whole podcast right from your app. One click helps a friend start the day the way you do and helps make the program grow.

The World and Everything in It comes to you from WORLD Radio.  WORLD’s mission is Biblically objective journalism that informs, educates, and inspires.

The Bible says: “The point is this: whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.” —II Corinthians 9:6, 7

Sunday’s coming! So make plans to worship with a Bible-believing church on the Lord’s Day.

And Lord willing, we’ll be right back here Monday morning.

Go now in grace and peace.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.