The World and Everything in It: May 22, 2026

Editor's note: The following text is a transcript of a podcast story. To listen to the story, click on the arrow beneath the headline above.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: Good morning!

Today on Culture Friday, an alternative to Pride month: Fidelity month.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Yeah, that and student questions: John Stonestreet is standing by.

Also today, frustrated Star Wars fans may find new hope in the latest film in the franchise. Collin Garbarino reviews The Mandalorian and Grogu.

MANDO: What are you waiting for? Hop on.

And Ask the Editor, our Lindsay Mast on countercultural journalism.

BROWN: It’s Friday, May 22nd. This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. 

I’m Myrna Brown.

EICHER: And I’m Nick Eicher. Good morning!

BROWN: Up next, Kent Covington with today’s news.

KENT COVINGTON, NEWS ANCHOR: Trump signals possible action in Cuba » President Trump seemed to signal on Thursday he could be ready to launch U.S. military action against Cuba.

He told reporters at the White House:

TRUMP: Other presidents have looked at this for fifty, sixty years doing something, and, uh, it looks like I'll be the one that does it.

His comments came a day after his Justice Department announced murder charges against former Cuban President, longtime dictator Raúl Castro.

The indictment mirrors drug-trafficking charges against former Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro that preceded a January military raid in Caracas to arrest him.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in Miami Thursday:

RUBIO: The president's preference is always a negotiated agreement that's peaceful. That's always our preference. That remains our preference with Cuba. I'm just being honest with you. You know, the likelihood of that happening given who we're dealing with right now is not high.

The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier and other U.S. Navy ships arrived in the Caribbean this week. The Trump administration has also tightened sanctions and restricted fuel shipments to Cuba

Iran latest » Iran says it's reviewing the latest peace proposal from the United States as President Trump says his patience is running out.

Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has been to Tehran twice in less than a week trying to keep the talks moving.

Two sticking points remain: First and foremost, Trump says Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and cannot keep its enriched uranium:

TRUMP: We don't need it. We don't want it. We'll probably destroy it after we get it, but we're not gonna let them have it.

Iran still says it won't give up its nuclear program. Teheran also wants the U.S. to agree to allowing it to charge tolls to any ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The president says that’s another non-starter.

TRUMP: We want it open, we want it free. We don't want tolls. Uh, it's international, it's an international waterway. They're not charging tolls.

Iran has offered to suspend uranium enrichment for five years. The U.S. wants 20.

Trump says Iran has only a few more days to reach a deal before the U.S. could resume strikes.

Reconciliation » Senators are heading home for Memorial Day recess without voting on a bill to fund immigration enforcement agencies.

WORLD’s Harrison Watters reports.

HARRISON WATTERS: Senators spent Thursday morning approving nominations for district court judges, but wrapped up before a so-called “vote-a-rama” planned for the afternoon.

Republican leaders had removed a $1 billion request in the bill to fund security for a new White House ballroom after the Senate Parliamentarian said it broke chamber rules.

But they then hit the brakes on the entire package after the Justice Department unveiled a nearly $2 billion fund to compensate Americans for alleged Biden-era political targeting.

Democrats promised to swamp the session with amendments to block that fund. And Majority Leader John Thune said the White House needs to answer a lot of questions about it.

Thune delayed the vote on immigration enforcement funding until after next week’s recess. The Senate will return on June 1st—the day the President hopes to sign the legislation into law.

Reporting for WORLD, I’m Harrison Watters.

Trump emissions rollback » The Trump administration is loosening federal rules on the kinds of refrigerants grocery stores and air-conditioning companies have to use.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced the change Thursday — pushing back deadlines from a 2023 Biden-era rule that phased out a class of refrigerants called hydrofluorocarbons.

Trump made the announcement at a White House ceremony alongside grocery executives.

TRUMP: Many grocery stores and restaurants had no choice but to replace their refrigerators entirely. And these costs rose. Americans faced higher grocery prices and reduced access to critical medical supplies.

Trump says it will have no adverse effect on the environment. Critics, though, disagree. Some environmental groups say it'll slow the phase-out of refrigerants many times more potent than carbon dioxide.

Israel deports hundreds of Gaza flotilla activists » In Turkey:

SOUND: [Activists return home]

Hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists who tried to breach Israel's naval blockade of Gaza returned home Thursday. That, after Israel security forces apprehended and deported them.

Turkish state media reported that several appeared to have injuries and were expected to undergo medical checks. One activist with a black eye claimed his injuries were caused by Israeli police.

ACTIVIST: They put my head down and started beating me. One of them had gloves on with hardened plastic and he started punching my face and it swelled shut.

That claim could not be independently verified, but it came after Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir posted a video on his X account, drawing widespread condemnation.

SOUND: [Video from Ben Gvir's X account]

The video appeared to show the activists crammed together, handcuffed and bowing as the security minister mocked them and forced them to listen to the Israeli national anthem.

The video was widely condemned. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog were among Israeli officials expressing outrage.

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also chimed in, characterizing the flotilla effort as a stupid stunt, but calling Ben Gvir's actions "despicable."

I'm Kent Covington.

Coming up: Collin Garbarino on whether The Mandalorian and Grogu does or does not live up to expectations. Plus, Ask the Editor.

This is The World and Everything in It.

NICK EICHER, HOST: It’s Friday May 22nd.

Glad to have you along for today’s edition of The World and Everything in It. Good morning, I’m Nick Eicher.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: And I’m Myrna Brown. It’s Culture Friday. Joining us now is John Stonestreet. He’s president of the Colson Center. He’s host of the Breakpoint podcast, and he’s here now. Good morning.

JOHN STONESTREET: Good morning.

BROWN: John, we’re coming up on June, which for decades in American public life has been dominated by so-called Pride Month celebrations.

But there’s now a counter-observance gaining traction among religious conservatives … it’s been around a few years. It’s called “Fidelity Month.” It’s the idea that June ought to honor fidelity to God, to family, to country instead of celebrating sexual identity politics.

The effort is associated with Princeton professor Robert George and it’s drawn support from Christian conservatives across denominational lines.

It’s a great idea and I know it’ll be active again this year … but is there any danger, John, that conservatives simply become reactive? In other words, are we too busy building parallel observances instead of articulating a positive vision of the good life? What do you say?

STONESTREET: Well, one of the reasons I've loved Fidelity Month since the idea first came across my attention is exactly that, is that this is an articulation of a positive vision of the good life, in the sense of what the good life historically has meant. What is good? How do we actually flourish as human beings?

We don't flourish with an inward turn. We flourish with an outward turn. We flourish by being faithful—faithful in our trust to God, faithful to those to whom we have responsibility, especially our families, and then faithful ultimately to country.

Now, if you ask Professor George, though, he does not describe this as an alternative. I know it is, because you can't celebrate both. You can't celebrate one of the seven deadly sins on one hand, and then faithfulness to God and to others on the other hand, so they are polar opposites. I think that competition is probably built into the system.

Listen, whatever happens with Pride Month, I love the idea of Fidelity Month because it's true and it's good, and it wasn't invented just as a way to get back at those who are celebrating something else. It is something worth honoring and remembering.

I think it's especially true right now in light of the 250th anniversary of America. 

You can choose to participate in it by putting something on your social media feed, by just changing your profile picture. All of it is available at FidelityMonth.com.

I'm a big fan of it. In fact, this year, to connect with the 250th anniversary of America, there's a high school essay contest with cash prizes, so you can show your fidelity to God and others and maybe get some cash. I don't know if there's a contradiction in terms there, but it's something people should know about, and it's a lot of fun.

I love the idea. It is gaining traction. Pride is losing traction, so why not lean in this year?

EICHER: John, as you can tell from the backdrop on the screen, we’re in a different location today. A lot of our team is up in northwest Iowa, and Myrna is here with me. We’re involved in the 2026 World Journalism Institute Collegiate course and it’s an honor to get to do it. As we’ve done the last several years when we’re here at Dordt University, we ask the students whether they have questions. They do again this year, and we have time for a few.

SNOWDEN: Hi, my name is Kelsey Snowden. I am a student at Southwest Baptist University. My question is: Are we seeing a devaluing of the humanities in higher education? If so, how will that impact the workforce going forward?

STONESTREET: Oh, we were not seeing it. We have seen it. 

Devaluing things like great literature, great works, those things that make you think. Prioritizing pragmatism, getting a grade, getting a result, getting a job, as if education itself is primarily a transactional endeavor as opposed to a transformational endeavor.

All of these things have been pretty much in the water for quite some time. I do think it's gotten worse. I do think the amount of debt that students go into, oftentimes to study a field that isn't actually a field and get a degree that means nothing and makes one less employable than they were maybe going in—I mean, these are the realities of higher education right now.

I do think that perhaps more than at any other time that I can think of in my lifetime, the opportunity for Christians to show a better way—what education really is, the pursuit of ideas, of wisdom. To become an educated person is to be someone who's curious, to be always learning and to be exploring and living not just for self-expressive individualism.

That requires, as a student, that you're humble, you're not sucked into the chronological snobbery that is at the heart, as C.S. Lewis called it, that's at the heart of so much of this devaluing of the past, the valuing of the great ideas, and the elevation of the individual over and above the humility that is required to actually be a student.

EICHER: John, speaking of the humanities and higher education, did you see this one?

The Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education—this was reported in The Wall Street Journal—found a 30 percent relative surge in A grades in college courses heavily exposed to artificial intelligence since the launch of ChatGPT.

STONESTREET: That’s really amazing. Yeah, what a coincidence!

EICHER: Thirty percent is not a small rise, though I’ll admit I half expected an even bigger bump. We actually had several student questions on AI, but here’s the one we decided to go with:

KEARNEY: Hi, John. My name is Katie Kearney, and I'm a student at Emmaus University in Iowa. My question is about AI. With the amount of AI content flooding the internet right now, and with how realistic it's been getting, how do you think this will affect the way people use the internet long term?

STONESTREET: Well, I think it's affected the way people use the internet already in dramatic ways. I mean, the most obvious way is we're all kind of in on how much better AI search is than actually relying on Google.

Of course, all of that in and of itself was a replacement of something. What it meant when I was a kid and I had a question and my mom said, “Look it up,” what she meant was go to a book. To go to a book for the answers for our questions is a fundamentally different exercise than going online.

Whether you start at page one and get to page 70 or you start at page one and only get to page seven, it's a linear way of approaching life and the world. It orders your brain in a cause-and-effect sort of way. What happens on page one takes you to page two, and so on.

Already in life online, or life on the internet, we lost a lot of linear capability in our thought. We've lost the capability to think about life in terms of cause and effect. There were always workarounds. Life was seen in the network, and there's benefits to that, but there's also liabilities.

Fundamentally, I think the challenge—and we'll see it in a million different ways—but fundamentally the challenge is that our technology should be tools that we use in order to enhance our humanity. The real tragedy happens when it's used to replace our humanity.

Those are tough lines always to figure out because we certainly do appreciate the ability to get around disability with some of our technology or to increase our capability because of our technology. But when it replaces what it means to be human, that's when we're in really dangerous territory.

For example, in the search world, the idea that we could access an incredible amount of information at any point of our day—the access to knowledge became a really bad substitute for the acquisition of wisdom. Those aren't the same things, but in the information age it's easy to take those two things and confuse them.

Now, when it comes to an AI generation with even more effective access to even more information, even more conveniently, then we'll miss the things that make us human, the ability to cultivate wisdom, the hard, inefficient ways that are required of us if we're actually going to think well.

If we shortcut those things, then we're going to be impoverished. It's going to make us poor in pretty profound ways.

FOSTER: Hi, John. My name is Micah Foster, and I'm a senior at Reformation Bible College from Sanford, Florida. My question is about a growth in liturgical church interest among young men. I've noticed a lot of my male friends in their teens and in college are becoming interested in Catholic or Orthodox churches. Why do you think we're seeing this trend?

I think this is a part of a larger trend because if you actually look at the overall numbers, the actual numbers of those who are converting to either Roman Catholicism or Orthodoxy, there's actually not as big of a trend line as many people have the impression that there is, and it's probably not all that greater than those from Catholic and Orthodox backgrounds converting to Protestant and evangelical ones.

I do think, though, we're seeing something specific among young men, which, of course, was your question, but it's an important distinction.

What we're seeing is that young men do seem to be trending more conservative in many areas, including religious affiliation, and young women are actually trending the other direction in some reports.

This is not really an increase of those who are converting. It's a decrease in the ones that we're losing out of religion and religious identification altogether, and so it seems like a growth.

I will make at least one suggestion, and that is that we are coming out of, in many ways and thankfully so, a seeker-friendly model within the evangelical church in which basically pastors and church leaders and worship pastors and so on had to make up something new every week and essentially had to outperform and outdo themselves week in and week out.

What we wanted was something that didn't need to be made up each and every week.

I think there's something in a postmodern ethos where we're told everything is a social construct and history is bunk, to actually go back and see, “Oh no, there's a historical trend here. We're not making stuff up. There's something solid here to stand on.”

Now, I don't think that necessarily is fully a reality, as if there's no problem in the history of liturgics or older hierarchical churches. Of course, there's all kinds of issues.

But I do think there's a bit of pushing back against the inventiveness that really defined the last several decades, and you're seeing kind of a pendulum swing the other way.

There was a promise that if we didn't get into the rote, the rhythm, the habit of saying the same thing over and over and over, then it would be more authentic, and I just think that didn't come true.

I think that was probably a false dynamic, and things have changed.

EICHER: John Stonestreet is president of the Colson Center and host of the Breakpoint podcast. John, thanks!

STONESTREET: Thank you both.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Today is Friday, May 22nd.

Thank you for turning to WORLD Radio to help start your day.

Good morning. I’m Nick Eicher.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: And I’m Myrna Brown.

Coming next on The World and Everything in It: after a long hiatus, Star Wars returns to the silver screen. Arts and culture editor Collin Garbarino reviews The Mandalorian and Grogu.

COLLIN GARBARINO: It’s been seven years since The Rise of Skywalker left Star Wars fans with mixed emotions over the state of the galaxy far, far away. Then Lucasfilm began cranking out streaming content for Disney+ instead of developing new films. Much of that content was of such middling quality that the emotions of diehard fans started to become less mixed and more hostile toward parent company Disney.

MUSIC: [Mandalorian theme song]

But it wasn’t all bad. Both critics and fans adored the first season of The Mandalorian—a Western-inspired series about a tough-as-nails bounty hunter who rescues the eminently meme-able Baby Yoda named Grogu. Now Lucasfilm wants to pivot back to theaters, so it’s adapting its most popular duo for the big screen.

MANDO: What are you waiting for? Hop on.

The Mandalorian and Grogu takes place during the years after the Empire’s defeat in The Return of the Jedi. Mando is no longer a gunslinger for hire. He and his force-sensitive ward make their living working for the New Republic, rounding up imperial warlords who remain at large.

MANDO: I only hunt down imperial war criminals. I don’t work for gangsters anymore, especially the Hutts.

COLONEL WARD: That’s right, you don’t. You work for us. And right now, this is what we need you to do.

Their next mission will test their resourcefulness.

COLONEL WARD: Commander Coyne. Our missing ace of staves. No one knows what he looks like and most believe him to be dead.

MANDO: Not a lot to go on.

In searching for their quarry, Mando and Grogu run afoul the galaxy’s most notorious crime family. The Hutts don’t take kindly to having New Republic bounty hunters meddling in their affairs.

HUTT: We know the Mandalorian creed. You will be outcast for letting an enemy see your face.

MANDO: Not if you all die.

It could be a tough sell for Disney to convince folks who are used to watching this story on the small screen to get off the sofa and head to the theater to watch the next installment. But the film includes some truly cinematic visuals. The movie was filmed for IMAX, and it drops us into an expansive, beautiful, and thrilling world.

MANDO: This is worth a lot more than the bounty on that imp.

COLONEL WARD: Well, let’s call it an advance on the next mission.

Even though the film is rated PG-13, it’s probably safe for younger kids who don’t mind sci-fi action. There’s no foul language or sensuality. Mando might come across as the John Wick of the Star Wars universe, but for the most part, his action packed battles remain bloodless. Though don’t expect the gritty Western feel from the TV series. This movie is more like Blade Runner meets Gladiator meets Predator.

It’s typical for Star Wars films to have a healthy dose of humor, and this movie is no exception. Mando might be a no-nonsense tough guy, but his nonverbal sidekick peppers the film with amusing moments that are also terribly cute. And the father/son bond they share gives the film its emotional core.

MANDO: Grogu, I need you to go to the control panel. Remember the buttons I told you never to touch. I’m going to need you to touch them.

But while most fans will enjoy The Mandalorian and Grogu, the film isn’t perfect. In many ways it manages to recapture the look and feel of the original trilogy, but one of the computer-generated Hutts never looked quite as real as the giant Jabba puppet from Return of the Jedi. Also, the 132-minute film is about 20 minutes too long. The second half drags, and a couple scenes don’t add anything to the story. We also have to listen to one character give the same cliché-laden speech twice.

IMPERIAL WARLORD: Did we get him?

AT-AT DRIVER: Not yet, sir. But we will.

Despite its deficiencies, Star Wars fans will enjoy the movie because it respects the franchise and the audience. Even folks unfamiliar with the series can enjoy it. Those who thoroughly know Star Wars lore will be delighted by some of the inclusions, but knowing the back story isn’t necessary. The film tells you what you need to know.

And embedded in this story about a grizzled warrior and his adopted son is a message that America, in the midst of a demographic crisis, needs to hear. As Mando says, “The old protect the young, and then the young protect the old.”

MANDO: This is the way.

I’m Collin Garbarino.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: Good morning! This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Myrna Brown.

NICK EICHER, HOST: And I’m Nick Eicher. It’s time now for Ask the Editor.

As you heard a moment ago, we’re at Dordt University for the 28th World Journalism Institute collegiate course. Appropriately, Ask-the-Editor this month is on journalism education, because there has been a lot of asking of the editor.

BROWN: No doubt! One of the student projects this week had to do with a couple of cases about to be decided in the Supreme Court: cases on men in women’s sports. And a student question happened to land on the desk of producer Lindsay Mast, who joins us now. Good morning, Lindsay!

LINDSAY MAST: Good morning! The students were writing reports about a story that involved transgender athletes– boys who were competing against girls in sports and taking their places on the podium. Here’s WORLD’s Lauren Smyth to describe the situation:

LAUREN SMYTH: They were all doing the practice legal case assignment, which concerned two male transgender athletes suing to participate in female sports. One lawyer referred to the plaintiff as "he," and the other used "she," and confusion abounded. The students weren't sure what term to use or how to make it clear to the listener who/what they were talking about.

And this is when the power of what WORLD does at WJI crystallized a little bit more for me. And here’s why. We have dozens of smart, energetic, Christian young people who have come to us from all over the country:

AUDIO: [MONTAGE OF STUDENT INTRODUCTIONS]

These students went through a lengthy application process because they wanted us to put them through the paces on what they will face should they continue in the field of journalism.

And these questions likely won’t go away in their lifetime. Most of these students were in elementary school when the Obergefell decision came down. They’ve likely never known a social media account that didn’t prompt them to put in pronouns of their own–Facebook added 50 gender options to profiles when these students were less than 10 years old. About 1 out of every 4 of their Gen Z peers would say they fall somewhere on the LGBTQ spectrum.

You can see why this generation specifically would need an answer to the question they asked Lauren:

SMYTH: What’s our policy on pronouns for transgender people?

It’s one that our own staff has had to grapple with in jobs at traditional newsrooms. And we deal with that or similar questions every day at WORLD, having to make real time judgment calls about how we will present information to you. The Associated Press stylebook has long been the standard for grammar, style, and language among journalists. We like to say that we follow their style… except when we don’t.

Take for instance, how the Associated Press and an NPR affiliate talked about the drug Mifepristone recently.

AP: Most abortions in the U.S. are obtained by taking medication usually involving this pill mifepristone.

WUWM: The United States Supreme Court issued a temporary order restoring nationwide access to a widely used abortion medicine.

But what does it mean to call Mifepristone “abortion medication”?

The Cambridge Dictionary defines medication as a medicine, or a set of medicines or drugs, used to improve a particular condition or illness.

In our May 12th episode here’s how we handled that same topic:

NICK EICHER: Up next, the U.S. Supreme Court extended a stay yesterday that allows mail orders of the abortion drug, mifepristone.

That’s just one subtle difference…but it comes out of our belief that we tell the truth. And accurate language is vital to truth telling.

Here’s our thinking: first of all, pregnancy is not an illness. Secondly, if a medicine is something that’s harming –killing– a child in the womb that’s contradictory to medication’s definition of improving a particular condition or illness, Sure, mifepristone is packaged like a medication– it comes in pill form. And there are some limited approved uses for it for true illnesses. But in conjunction with the term abortion, it’s not by definition a medication, and using the term that way paints what it does, and why, inaccurately.

And that’s just one topic, one word, out of the roughly five-thousand this program alone produces each day.

Our news director Kent Covington interacts with other reporting probably the most out of any of us at WORLD Radio. He spends time each day combing through its bias. Here’s what he told me when I asked about what he encounters:

KENT COVINGTON: WORLD is honest about having a worldview that serves as our starting point for truth. We don't claim to be impartial on all matters - because we're clear that the Bible is our foundation. Other sources may claim impartiality or being "without an agenda" ... when they very clearly have agendas and a crystal clear worldview, almost always a left of center worldview, that drives story selection and prioritization, its chosen sources, and its writing. WORLD is honest about its worldview while others are not as forthcoming.

To be clear: we do not always get these things right. We work under tight deadlines on complex stories. But you can trust that we are thinking about what we say and how we say it. Our editorial staff is talking about it, and trying to cut through noise we now find in sources we once depended on and looked up to.

So that brings us back to WJI and the question raised by the students. Here’s what I told Lauren: We tell the truth. A person with XY chromosomes is a man. XX is a woman.

Of course how we tell the truth matters too–we are to do it in love. As Christians, we respect each person’s worth and dignity and we are held to a high standard in how we speak of others. So we work hard not to disrespect those who are struggling with identity issues. We may have to spend extra time explaining how someone views him- or herself, but we strive to be as accurate as possible.

And that’s one of the reasons we believe in the work of WJI. Some of these students are at Christian schools, some are not. Some are studying journalism, some are in other fields. But they are all young Christians who at least have an interest in living out their worldview in the field of journalism. What WJI provides for them is a place to work through these questions under the guidance of other Christians. We know many of you believe in it too, and give financially to help make it happen each year.

So we thank you for your support. And we covet your prayers for these students and for those of us tasked with guiding them.

And that’s Ask the Editor for the month of May. I’m Lindsay Mast.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Alright, time now to name the crew who helped with this week’s programs:

Mary Reichard, David Bahnsen, Jenny Rough, Mary Muncy, Juliana Chan Erikson, Kim Henderson, Cal Thomas, Onize Oduah, Hunter Baker, Janie B. Cheaney, Arsenio Orteza, Daniel Suhr, John Stonestreet, Collin Garbarino, and Josh Goniea.

Thanks also to our breaking news crew: Kent Covington, Steve Kloosterman, Travis Kircher, Daniel Devine, and Christina Grube.

And thanks to the guys who are up late so your program is ready early: Tech producers Benj Eicher and Carl Peetz.

Harrison Watters is Washington producer, Kristen Flavin is features editor, Emma Eicher is assistant producer, Lindsay Mast is producer. I’m Executive Producer, Nick Eicher.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: And I’m Myrna Brown.

The World and Everything in It comes to you from WORLD Radio. WORLD’s mission is biblically objective journalism that informs, educates, and inspires.

The Bible says: “Oh how I love your law! It is my meditation all the day. Your commandment makes me wiser than my enemies, for it is ever with me. I have more understanding than all my teachers, for your testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the aged, for I keep your precepts. I hold back my feet from every evil way, in order to keep your word. I do not turn aside from your rules, for you have taught me. How sweet are your words to my taste, sweeter than honey to my mouth! Through your precepts I get understanding; therefore I hate every false way.” —Psalm 119:97–104

A reminder to go to a Bible-believing, truth-telling church this weekend. Lift someone’s burden and let someone help carry yours. 

And Lord willing, we’ll be right back here with you on Monday.

Go now, in grace and peace.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.