Andrew Walker: Rethinking influence

Editor's note: The following text is a transcript of a podcast story. To listen to the story, click on the arrow beneath the headline above.

NICK EICHER, HOST: Today is Tuesday, June 17th. Good morning! This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Nick Eicher.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: And I’m Mary Reichard. Up next, WORLD Opinions managing editor Andrew Walker with a warning for so-called “Christian elites.”

ANDREW WALKER: For the past several decades, American evangelicals have heard a constant refrain from within their own ranks: We need more Christian scholars in the academy. More believers in the arts. More evangelicals at the highest levels of government, journalism, science, and business. The argument goes something like this: If Christians retreat from the commanding heights of culture, then we forfeit the opportunity to shape policy and the broader moral imagination of our nation.

There is some wisdom in this instinct. Cultural presence matters. The lament that evangelicals have often been anti-intellectual or culturally withdrawn is not wholly unfounded. At the same time, I know many so-called evangelical “elites” in business, law, think-tanks, government, and academia. None of them is self-consciously preoccupied with being an “elite.” They are preoccupied with excellence and conviction.

But the evidence of recent years suggests that producing Christian elites is not the silver bullet it was promised to be.

Consider a couple examples. Francis Collins was a celebrated Christian scientist who headed the Human Genome Project and later served as director of the NIH. He was lionized as a model of evangelical engagement with secular power. But during the COVID-19 pandemic, Collins enthusiastically used his post to marginalize dissent. His leadership oversaw debauched research, yielded to LGBTQ degeneracy, and revealed the subtle corruptions that accompany power more than the redemptive possibilities of Christian presence in elite institutions.

Or take N.T. Wright, the brilliant Biblical scholar, whose scholarly and popular writings shaped a generation of evangelicals. Wright’s commentary on political and cultural issues often lands with a thud—not because it lacks erudition, but because it frequently sounds indistinguishable from the educated Western intelligentsia. Not only that, his posture toward American evangelicalism drips with condescension. Just recently, he made appallingly shallow comments granting the legitimacy of abortion in certain instances. That was compounded by an incredibly reckless comment that his resurrection-denying friend, the late Marcus Borg, was a Christian. The fact that Wright can write the magnum opus of our day defending the bodily resurrection while treating it as a secondary matter really is as astounding as it is confounding.

One is left wondering whether the point of rising to elite status was to offer a distinctly Christian voice or simply to earn a seat at the table by accommodating the reigning orthodoxy of leftism and secularism.

The problem is not chiefly “the scandal of the evangelical mind” …to quote Mark Noll’s now overused phrase of the 1990s. The problem is rather the scandal of compromising elites. Too many Christians, having achieved access to elite institutions, seem to lose their nerve. They crave acceptance more than they embody conviction. They confuse proximity to power with cultural influence, only to eventually find themselves being the ones influenced.

Why does this happen? One factor is the old and persistent evangelical inferiority complex. That insecurity breeds a deep temptation: Once a young evangelical finally gains admission to Harvard, the Times op-ed page, or the NIH, the pressure to be seen as reasonable, sophisticated, and nuanced becomes overwhelming. Convictional clarity begins to erode under the acid rain of elite deference.

Another factor is the failure of the evangelical community itself. We have not trained our would-be elites to understand that cultural power is not an end in itself. Christian fidelity will always, in some ways, be at odds with the spirit of the age. We cheer when one of our own gains influence, but we rarely provide the theological and moral formation necessary to withstand the spiritual hazards that come with that influence.

None of this is a call to withdraw from cultural engagement. On the contrary, it is a call to raise up a new kind of Christian leader—one who understands that bearing witness is more important than earning accolades, and that public influence is a stewardship, not a status symbol. We do need more Christians in the elite spaces of culture. But we need them to be the right kind: clear-headed, morally courageous, unashamed of the gospel, and willing to be thought of as fools for Christ.

I’m Andrew Walker.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.