Andrew Walker: Ordered loves

NICK EICHER, HOST: Today is Tuesday, February 4th. Good morning! This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. I’m Nick Eicher.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: And I’m Mary Reichard.

Up next, ordered love.

The Bible says we are called to show mercy to strangers, and prioritize providing for our own households. WORLD Opinions managing editor Andrew Walker says this is a framework that reflects the heart of God.

We begin with the comment that sparked thousands of comments.

JD VANCE COMMENT: You love your family and then you love your neighbor and then you love your community and then you love your fellow citizens in your own country and then after that you can focus and prioritize the rest of the world.

ANDREW WALKER: Vice President J.D. Vance’s recent comments have sparked a lot of discussion, particularly regarding how they align with Biblical teachings. Some critics argue that such an approach narrows the scope of Christian love, making it exclusive rather than expansive. However, a proper understanding of Scripture reveals that prioritizing one’s own household does not negate universal mercy. Rather, it structures it in a way that mirrors God’s design for human relationships.

Two passages seem to stand in tension that explain the debate concerning Vance’s remarks. On the one hand: Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan found in Luke chapter 10. On the other: and Paul’s instruction in 1 Timothy 5:8 that “anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”

The Good Samaritan exemplifies the radical love of Christ. In response to the question, “Who is my neighbor?” Jesus tells a story where the hero is an outcast—one who crosses ethnic and social boundaries to show mercy to a wounded stranger. This parable establishes that neighborly love extends beyond cultural or national identity. The Samaritan did not ask, “Is this man part of my community?” before helping him. He simply saw the need and responded with mercy, while those who thought of themselves as superiors to the Samaritan avoided rendering care.

At the same time, one of the reasons the Samaritan stands out is because those who should have cared for the man didn’t. Paul’s command in 1 Timothy establishes that there are levels of responsibility in care. He is writing to a church that was grappling with issues of neglect, urging Christians to take responsibility for their own family members first. This does not contradict the Good Samaritan’s actions. Rather, it ensures that Christian love is practiced faithfully at every relationship level.

Scripture does not contradict itself, nor does it demand that we choose between family responsibility and universal charity. Instead, it teaches an ethic of ordered love. In practical terms, this means three things.

First, every person is our neighbor. Christian love does not discriminate. The Good Samaritan reminds us that mercy is not confined by borders, ethnicity, or familiarity. When someone is in urgent need and we have the means to help, we should.

Second, some neighbors have a greater claim on our care. While we are called to love all, Scripture acknowledges that we have unique obligations to those closest to us. Parents have a special duty to their children, spouses to each other, and members of a church to fellow believers as we read in Galatians 6:10. This prioritization does not diminish the value of others but acknowledges that care begins in concentric circles—moving outward from family to community to the broader world.

Third, radical hospitality and responsibility are not mutually exclusive. Prioritizing our family and immediate community does not mean ignoring others. The Good Samaritan acted because he had both the proximity and the means to help. Likewise, when we encounter those in dire need, we are called to respond in love, regardless of their background.

The criticism that Vance’s comments reflect an exclusionary or narrow-minded ethic misunderstands a fundamental aspect of Christian teaching. It also betrays the long tradition of Christian thought from Augustine to John Calvin, teaching that Christians have a special obligation to care for those with whom they have deeper ties. The Christian tradition has long held that love must be rightly ordered. This is not a rejection of universal compassion but rather a reflection of how God structured human relationships.

Ultimately, the Good Samaritan and Paul’s teaching in 1 Timothy are not at odds. Rather, they together paint a picture of holistic Christian love—one that begins at home, remains open to the needs of others, and refuses to be bound by tribalism or prejudice. This is the ethic that has shaped Christian thought for centuries, and it remains just as relevant today.

I’m Andrew Walker.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.