West of Memphis | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

West of Memphis


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

In 1993, searchers for three missing 8-year-old boys found their bodies in a drainage ditch in West Memphis, Ark. Investigators believed that because of the injuries to the boys’ bodies, the murders were the result of a satanic ritual. A year later, a jury convicted three West Memphis teenagers, one of whom had journaled about the occult, of the murders. The court sentenced Jessie Misskelley Jr., 18, and Jason Baldwin, 16, to life in prison, and Damien Echols, 19, to death.

As years passed, new evidence showed the crimes were likely not satanic. Witnesses recanted, more evidence appeared, and it became clear that local authorities had botched the case at key points. The release of the “West Memphis Three” became a cause célèbre. In 2011, the three were released from prison.

West of Memphis is the fourth major documentary on the crime, but this time the filmmakers have the benefit of new DNA evidence. The film convincingly depicts who the real killer was, but because of the special plea deal the West Memphis Three took for their release from prison, the case is officially closed. (Warning: the film includes graphic crime scene footage of the boys’ bodies.)

HBO’s documentaries on the crime—Paradise Lost, Paradise Lost 2, and Paradise Lost 3—depict the wrongful convictions as partly a result of a Bible Belt community looking for the occult under every rock. But West of Memphis notes that everyone in America was obsessed with the occult at the time—even Oprah. Director Amy Berg shows that these convictions could have happened in any town, not just a Southern evangelical one.

But the film has a major weakness: Berg allows the self-congratulatory celebrities who made the case their cause onto the screen. The filmmakers interview Peter Jackson, the film’s producer, about his generous investment in the case. Later Eddie Vedder, the lead singer of Pearl Jam, talks about the “endurance” he needed for this cause. Good for Vedder, but who cares?

You leave the film wanting healing not just for the victims’ families and the wrongly accused, but also for West Memphis, where you see poverty, abuse, and broken families. The celebrities didn’t sound like they were sticking around for that.


Emily Belz

Emily is a former senior reporter for WORLD Magazine. She is a World Journalism Institute graduate and also previously reported for the New York Daily News, The Indianapolis Star, and Philanthropy magazine. Emily resides in New York City.

@emlybelz

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments