Watch out, left, here comes political multiculturalism | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Watch out, left, here comes political multiculturalism

The legs of journalistic spectrumologists-those who classify candidates as "left" or "right"-are getting shaky


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Exhibit A: The Baltimore Sun reported that a "right-wing leader" was shot to death in the Netherlands. The New York Times referred to the slain politician as a "rightist"; the Austin American-Statesman called him "far-right." The story concerned "an openly gay former sociology professor," Pim Fortuyn, who opposed immigration and was poised in his race for the Dutch presidency to gain up to one-third of the vote.

The story seemed underreported, because gay candidates are most often on the left. Was Fortuyn right-wing because he "talked with the confident bombast of other European far-right politicians"? (Far-left politicians also score high on the bombast aptitude test.) Or was he right-wing because he criticized Muslim immigrants? Yes, that's it: anti-immigrant = far right. But wait: The reason he fought immigration was because the newcomers were opposed to homosexuality and feminism.

Journalists in the United States have long had a labeling problem. Wasn't it strange that Russian Communists in the 1990s were called "conservatives"? But the problem will grow more severe, as the assumption by American leftists that Third World voices are on their side no longer holds up.

Exhibit B: Liberals generally sneer at abstinence-only programs in schools and support distribution of condoms, but note what Janet K. Museveni, wife of Uganda's president, said at the United Nations earlier this month: "The young person who has been trained to be disciplined will, in the final analysis, survive better than the one who has been instructed to wear a piece of rubber and continues with 'business as usual.'"

Mrs. Museveni said, "When we fail to teach our young that there are some moral absolutes and they must reckon with them or perish, then we do grievous harm to the future of the human race." Her plea that the UN should stop tossing condoms to kids is backed up by Uganda's experience: Since the AIDS-ravaged African nation left the rubber plantation and began aggressively advocating abstinence in 1995, the rate of new HIV infection has dropped by two-thirds.


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments