Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Up from 'homophobia': Amazin' Met Murphy, part deux

Baseball is a constantly surprising sport, but New York Mets second baseman Daniel Murphy’s turnaround is still extraordinary. In March, Mets management treated him like dog germs, announcing he “will no longer address his religious beliefs and will stick to baseball.” Now, in October, the Grantland sports website is calling Murphy “an exploding supernova, dropped into the heart of an erupting volcano.”

As Grantland’s Jonah Keri summarized the fireworks show, Murphy is setting playoff records, “cracking homers in four straight playoff games, as well as five in the first seven postseason games of his career. … [T]he Mets are two wins away from their first trip to the World Series in 15 years because a pretty good player is suddenly hitting like peak Barry Bonds.” (The Mets enter tonight’s Game 3 of the National League Championship Series with a 2-0 game lead over the Chicago Cubs in the best-of-seven series.)

Keri exuded more awe concerning Murphy’s “borderline impossible” playoff performance so far:

“[Mets manager] Terry Collins bats him cleanup in Game 1 of the NLDS when all the data in the world says to do otherwise … and Murphy goes yard off [Los Angeles Dodgers super pitcher Clayton] Kershaw. Murphy rates as an average baserunner … and pulls off one of the boldest and most influential foot feats in playoff history. Murphy ranks as one of the worst glovemen at second base … and he makes a beautiful diving stop to seal a Mets win. … Murphy gets an opposing manager so freaked out he walks him intentionally.”

Unmentioned in the Grantland article: The silencing that took place on March 3, when Murphy—a Fellowship of Christian Athletes regular—forthrightly answered a reporter’s question about a spring training visit by gay ex-player Billy Bean, baseball’s official “ambassador of inclusion.” Murphy said, “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual. That doesn’t mean I can’t still invest in him and get to know him … but I do disagree with the lifestyle, 100 percent.”

That’s when Mets management told Murphy to shut up. The chilling effect of that incident was evident throughout the baseball season, as no other active major leaguer to my knowledge said anything about homosexuality. To his credit, Murphy, after the key game in the Mets’ divisional series against the Los Angeles Dodgers, was not silent about Christ. “There was a lot of prayer going on out there,” he said, “just asking for peace and just talking to Jesus and asking for peace those last three or four innings.”

I’m not proposing a baseball version of the prosperity gospel, where courageous Christian players can expect to hit better. Asked why he has played so well in the postseason, Murphy said, “I don’t know. Sometimes the blessings come. Jesus is good. …” Nevertheless, Logo TV’s NewNowNext blog, which covers pop culture from an LGBT perspective, grumpily reported, “Murphy is being hailed as the team’s savior in the postseason, but his words about the LGBT community are less than angelic.”

The blog added that comments about Murphy’s “homophobic response have resurfaced on Twitter:

Marvin Olasky

Marvin is editor in chief of WORLD and dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has also been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.



Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.

Paul B. Taylor

In situations like these, it is best to remember the Bible.  The silencing of baseball great Daniel Murphy is not the silencing of Mr. Murphy: it is the silencing of the Bible.  He should express his belief as not originating from what he thinks, but rather from what the Bible states concerning homosexuality.  The liberal challenge would then fade because, in the final analysis, they cannot ban the Bible.  Now it has to be made clear that the point of attack is always the Word of God.


NewNowNext blog apparently "disagrees with" his lifestyle too.  Since when is that a social crime?


As usual, when someone is quick to call others names, the names they use most often apply much more to themselves than the people they are trying to denigrate.