Throwing the bums out | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Throwing the bums out

But with a lot of collateral damage


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

You saw the idealism, and then you saw people lose a little focus, and you saw the corrupt influences of power affect Republicans." That's how Rep. John Shadegg of Arizona put it, and he's right.

"I'm a lifelong Baptist and vote for Democrats. One reason? Democrats are serious about alleviating poverty." That's what North Carolina basketball coaching legend Dean Smith said in newspaper ads, and he's partly right.

He's only partly right because Democrats, although often serious, have been ineffective-and how serious are those who repeatedly choose what sounds good over what is good?

But Republican failures made Coach Smith's statement look right to many voters. Republicans paid for their inability, despite congressional majorities, to move ahead a compassionate conservative agenda. They did not advance alternatives to the failed faith that we measure our concern for the poor by the size of our governmental appropriations.

Not to say that poverty-fighting was a major issue in the campaign. Certainly Iraq was No. 1, although the election was by no means a mandate to give up. (A New York Times/CBS News Poll just before the election showed 55 percent of Americans wanting to send more troops to Iraq, and 62 percent thinking the United States will have to stay in Iraq beyond two years.)

But we tend to vote for those with whom we feel comfortable-and for many Americans, Republicans over the past five years have once again become the party of corporate suits. That didn't matter politically as long as folks thought the GOP was leading well concerning national security. Once that bulwark was gone, though, many voters looked to see if there was any other reason to choose Republicans-and concluded that there was not.

Reality eventually trumps image. Karl Rove in the 1990s saw the political potential of compassionate conservatism: It blasted away at stereotypes about mean-spirited Republicans and left many among the warm-hearted feeling that they were not selling out by voting for those their parents had scorned. But the GOP showed it was not serious about alleviating poverty when it did not push through a decentralizing mix of anti-poverty tax credits and vouchers.

By just playing politics it opened the door to campaigns such as that of ordained minister Ted Strickland, who became Ohio's first Democratic governor in 16 years as he went around quoting Micah's injunction to do justice and love mercy. Just playing politics made some voters hope they could trust House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi, who bragged that her party had a 42-member Democratic Faith Working Group.

It's right that some Republicans lost after they betrayed the principles that brought the GOP to congressional power in 1994 and elected George W. Bush as a compassionate conservative. It's good that some moderate Democrats won.

Now congressional Democrats have to govern. Democrats for Life wants the party to change its abortion position and hopes that Bob Casey Jr. will lead the way-but how will Democrats for Death respond? Will Democratic leaders take seriously evangelical concerns, or will they be like those who last year held a seminar at the University of California-Berkeley titled, "I Don't Believe in God, But I Know America Needs a Spiritual Left"?

It will be fascinating to watch Democrats try to make their tent bigger without alienating their Christophobic base. I hope they succeed, because America could use two parties that respect biblical belief, so that evangelicals aren't captive to one. It will be fascinating to see if President Bush will start vetoing spending bills filled with pork and earmarks. I hope he becomes the fighter on domestic policy that he was supposed to be.

It's sad that good senators like Jim Talent and Rick Santorum became collateral damage. Santorum late in October spoke about "the gathering storm"-and he was referring to something far more important than this one election.

Santorum spoke the truth about America's need to "come to grips with the terrible fact that we are at war. It came to us and it will be with us for some time. There is no way to escape it, no matter what our policies, and whoever our elected representatives are. There is no escape because our enemies are fully committed to our destruction."

Let's pray that our new Congress can handle the truth.


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments