Theatrical politics | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Theatrical politics


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

If Mel Gibson brought religion to the multiplex, Michael Moore opened the door to politics. Fahrenheit 9/11, his ripping quasi-documentary on the Bush administration and the Iraq War, stirred lots of controversy, but, more importantly, made lots of money-grossing nearly $120 million by year's end. Like The Passion, Fahrenheit 9/11 may be most significant for copycat films that followed. But Mr. Moore's success also caught the attention of conservative filmmakers, who had a noticeable presence in theaters for the first time this year. In the short term, it seems likely that documentaries with a distinct point of view, liberal or conservative, will now find easier sources of funding.

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments