Talibanizing the other '-stans?
Ex-Soviet states-Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan-feel the heat from radical Islam
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
When state officials visited the homes of two Baptist families in Turkmenistan on July 14, the city's imam, or head of the Muslim community, accompanied them. Security police and the Muslim leader ordered the deportation of Nadezhda Potolova, along with her four children, and Valentina Kalataevskaya, a mother of seven. A year ago their husbands were ordered out because the families belong to an unregistered, independent Baptist congregation. The women and children have managed to avoid deportation for a year, while the men now live in Kazakhstan.
Turkmenistan is the most repressive of the five Central Asian republics. It, along with Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan, formed the underbelly of the Soviet Union until the '-stans gained independence just over a decade ago. Breaking with Moscow, however, has not eased Soviet-style repression. All five of the republics insist on government control over religion. Under those regulations, pastors are imprisoned for refusing to register their churches. Last year in Kazakhstan, police officers beat a Baptist pastor and threatened to cut off his tongue with scissors if he refused to renounce his faith.
In Turkmenistan most congregations are not allowed even to register as churches under its strict policy. Only Russian Orthodox churches and mosques approved by the state-sponsored Muslim Board are permitted. Two clergymen-Nasrullah ibn Ibadullah, the chief Muslim mufti, and Andrei Sapunov, the country's Orthodox leader-serve together as deputy chairmen of the government's Council for Religious Affairs. That gives them veto power over non-Orthodox churches and independent mosques.
Local officials are using the immigrant status of some Christian worshippers as cause for deportation. During the communist era, Moscow resettled Russians, Ukrainians, and others to the five republics. Officials canceled the residence permits of the Potolovs and Kalataevskys, then ordered their ouster. Those orders arrived at the families' doorstep last month in Turkmenbashi (formerly Krasnovodsk), a Caspian seaport.
The two families belong to a congregation affiliated with the International Council of Churches of Evangelical Christians/Baptists, an alliance of non-Orthodox congregations in the former Soviet republics, according to Keston Institute. The city's imam joined an officer of the KNB intelligence service (formerly the KGB), a passport inspector, and a local police officer to personally deliver the news. The officials gave the families one month to leave.
For Muslims, that kind of political power is new. Although 80 percent of Turkmens are Sunni Muslims, identifying themselves as Muslims was not permitted under atheistic communist rule. In Uzbekistan, President Islam Karimov was forced to change his surname from Karim in order to advance his political career under the Soviet system.
Now Muslims are well beyond an identity crisis. At the end of the Soviet era only 160 mosques existed in the region; that number has now shot past 5,000. Saudi Arabian financial backing helped build most of the mosques. While Christian workers have also made inroads in the now-independent states, experts say there is no question that Mohammed is replacing Marx.
The trend arises just as the region's strategic significance is increasing in the West. Within weeks of Sept. 11, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan military bases became home to American troops. The Bush administration desperately needs friendly real estate in this part of the world: to deploy troops, gather intelligence, and hunt down terrorists. With Afghanistan under U.S.-allied control, Pentagon officials say the bases are to remain launchpads for military assaults on al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremists linked to terrorism.
At the same time, they worry that the independent republics themselves could fall prey to radical elements like Afghanistan's Taliban, whose leaders have fled Afghanistan and may be hiding in the bordering republics. Only Kyrgyzstan has changed heads of state in the last 10 years. Mr. Karimov, Uzbekistan's president, recently pushed through a referendum extending his presidency at least through 2007. He refuses to eliminate state control over most business enterprises, and thwarts foreign exchange of the currency. The average wage is $20 per month, and thousands of political prisoners-Muslim and Christian-languish. In cracking down on the radicals, the former Soviet thugs often thwack the good guys, too.
Despite those policies, the United States has rewarded Uzbekistan for granting U.S. troops a foothold in the region. The United States has signed a classified security arrangement with Uzbekistan and promised a multimillion-dollar economic-aid package. Mr. Karimov's public thanks for his support was a visit last week from U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill.
Yet a volatile mix of repression, poverty, and religious persecution is optimal weather for the kind of radical Islam that flourished in the madrassas, or Islamic schools, to the south in Afghanistan and Pakistan-and, with it, lethal anti-Americanism.
With so much attention focused on Afghanistan, Taliban expert Ahmed Rashid says underground terrorist networks in the bordering states have not been affected and could still carry out smaller attacks. "You will not see what the Central Asians are used to, large-scale guerrilla forays," Mr. Rashid told reporters recently. "You will see acts of terrorism, particularly targeting the Americans."
Leading the security risks in Central Asia is the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, or IMU, financed largely by Osama bin Laden and closely connected with both the Taliban and al-Qaeda. The IMU's goal is to overthrow the Karimov regime by force and create an Islamic state ruled by Islamic, or Shariah, law. Although the group is on the Bush administration's terrorist watch list, the United States has done little to specifically target its members on the ground.
Taliban-controlled areas of Afghanistan provided sanctuary for IMU members until U.S. assaults began. The group, along with several radical Islamic parties, distributed leaflets in Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan during the early days of the war, calling on Muslims to aid the Taliban. Many now believe the group's military leader, Juma Namangani, died in fighting in the northern Afghan city of Kunduz.
But there has been no confirmation of his death, and Mr. Rashid believes it would not likely bring an end to IMU threats. In the past armed skirmishes with IMU militants led to airstrikes and street battles with the government. In August 2000 those lasted for two weeks after IMU fighters entered the country from Afghanistan. Explosions by IMU in Tashkent, the capital, killed at least 16. They prompted the government to arrest thousands of political opponents.
Government crackdowns against Islamic radicals are likely to continue, especially if they enhance relations with the United States. But the dragnets used on Islamic radicals are also entrapping Christians whose non-Orthodox worship puts them outside the system. Ironically, the independent republics promise no reforms until radical Islam is dealt with. And radical Islam is unlikely to go away without political changes.
-with reporting by Felix Corley, Keston News Service
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.