Palmetto picks | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Palmetto picks


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Questioner Robby George and historian Newt Gingrich won today's GOP presidential candidate forum in South Carolina. It was supposed to be Rick Perry's debate debut, but he fled the palmettos this morning to return to fire-singed central Texas.

George, Princeton's conservative professor, asked tough questions about religious freedom. Referring to Illinois madness, he asked whether the federal government should cut off funds to a state that discriminates against agencies that on grounds of conscience won't place children with gay foster or adoptive couples.

George also asked whether Congress should abide by Supreme Court decisions that violate the 14th Amendment's guarantees of due process and equal protection, since Section 5 of that amendment authorizes Congress to enforce those guarantees. All of the candidates responded in pro-family ways, but the nuances were significant.

Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain both said the Supreme Court should be supreme among courts but not among government branches. Ron Paul doesn't want the 14th Amendment to override the 10th, which empowers states. Mitt Romney supported protection for conscience in Illinois but fanned on the 14th amendment question because it "would create a constitutional crisis" and "that's not something I would precipitate."

The tragedy of Newt Gingrich was apparent once again. He showed that he has the best-stocked mind of the bunch. He eloquently quoted concerns of the Founders about Supreme Court oligarchy and spoke of the need to defend the Constitution against untrustworthy judges. Too bad he hasn't dealt openly with his past and convinced his former colleagues that he is trustworthy.


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments