No choice | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

No choice

Despite protections, state courts force hospitals to abort babies


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Abortion advocates claim to be "pro-choice," but they don't want communities or hospitals to have a choice about performing abortions. Some state courts are forcing hospitals to perform the procedure, despite a 1996 law meant to protect health-care professionals and any "health-care entity" from such coercion. In 1998, a number of senators said that they meant for "health-care entity" to include hospitals, but the pressure continues.

Rep. Michael Bilirakis is offering the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act to guarantee that hospitals have the conscience protections that Congress intended. Both sides of the issue testified at a July 11 hearing on the bill. Karen Vosburgh told of how officials at her nonsectarian community hospital in Palmer, Alaska, decided that "hospitals are for healing, not for killing" and adopted a pro-life policy, but it was reversed by the Alaska Supreme Court. Catherine Weiss of the ACLU called for a "balance" between religious liberty and abortion rights, so that hospitals that receive public funds should not gain a "broad and dangerous" exemption from performing abortions.

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments