Misdirection play?
SUDAN: Peace talks began last week to end Africa's longest-running civil war, but the Islamic government in Khartoum may be simply buying time to build its military might
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
SUDANESE REBEL LEADER JOHN Garang put off combat fatigues in favor of a blue oxford button-down in another attempt to salvage aborted peace talks with the Islamic government in Khartoum.
The rebel leader traveled to Kenya earlier this month to meet for the first time with Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Taha at a secluded Rift Valley resort. Mr. Garang hoped to break the ice with Khartoum's No. 2 man before government and rebel leaders began an eighth round of peace talks on Sept. 10.
The high-level, one-on-one meeting took seasoned Western observers by surprise. "This is a new development and not one we expected," said Ben Parker, Nairobi-based spokesman for the UN Office of Humanitarian Coordinator for Sudan.
Since the talks commenced one year ago, Mr. Garang has become an expert at the hat-in-hand routine. Rebels have put forward multiple peace proposals only to have them denounced by Khartoum. For Mr. Garang, who has battled the government from grass-fenced garrisons for two decades in Africa's longest-running civil war, the overtures represent an interesting role reversal, with rebels cast as diplomats to Sudan's irascible and fractious official leaders.
"We have come fully prepared to resolve the issues," said Mr. Garang upon arrival at Nairobi's Wilson airport on Sept. 4. "We are under pressure from the Sudanese people; they want peace and we want peace."
By contrast, Sudanese President Omar Bashir's official comment on peace talks was to tell mediators in Kenya to "go to hell." He rejected the seventh round of peace proposals in July and told negotiators they should come up with a "reasonable alternative" or "dissolve the document in water and drink it."
In a graphic picture of just how bad Sudan's war has been, many believe the negotiations are on track despite the rhetoric. "In principle, they are not denying us access," said Mr. Parker. "We have had access to areas we have not had access to for years. Larger populations are receiving services from us than ever before."
The most immediate benefit of peace talks has been an agreement by Khartoum to grant "unimpeded access" to UN humanitarian efforts. In the past Khartoum regularly blocked UN flights to areas under rebel control (see "Blue Nile blackout," June 10, 2000). Last January it allowed UN flights into Blue Nile province, an area cut off from official UN relief aid (but accessed under the radar by several private and church-based aid groups) since rebels took control in 1996.
But Mr. Parker told WORLD that several "areas of insecurity remain," indicating that a full ceasefire is not in place. And private relief workers are warning that the government may be buying time with its poor behavior at the bargaining table to grab more territory before a final settlement is reached.
The rebels, who represent Christians and other non-Muslims in southern Sudan but also include Muslim factions, have supported the latest proposal-called the Nakuru Document. They say they are prepared to end the war if the government will guarantee religious freedom and local autonomy to areas of south Sudan outside Khartoum's control. Government leaders insist that is a prescription for secession.
"The Nakuru Document is based on the express assumption of putting unity on hold," said Sudan's ambassador to the United States, Khidir H. Ahmed. "That would undoubtedly pave the way for two separate entities at the end of the interim period." He said the arrangement would guarantee a "full monopoly" over the south by Mr. Garang's Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army, or SPLM/A.
Even before this month's round of talks began, Mr. Ahmed told an audience at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., that he believed the most recent proposals were "a deliberate attempt to sabotage the peace process."
But according to SPLM/A's U.S. representative, Steven Wondu, "The parties are not being asked to sign on the dotted line." He told the same Woodrow Wilson Center gathering that the Nakuru "draft is a guide for negotiating the last corner on the path to peace."
The rebels say they will consent to power-sharing with Islamic government leaders but say many more specifics must be resolved. They want an end to state-imposed Shariah, or Islamic law. President Bashir has said he wants to keep Shariah in the capital. Mr. Wondu said the rebels will insist on "a national capital that shall be a symbol of national unity."
He, along with many U.S. officials and private relief workers, believe Khartoum may not be as serious about a negotiated settlement as it appears. "Khartoum clearly favors processes that drag on forever while it builds its military capability in preparation for a decisive victory on the ground," said Mr. Wondu.
Over the past year the government's military units stationed in parts of the south-along with militias loyal to the government-have violated the cease-fire agreement, particularly in Eastern Upper Nile Province. In a May attack government forces killed 59 civilians and captured 16, all women and children, in the village of Longochok. The captives were subsequently murdered.
In June a government-allied militia captured Mading, another village in the southeastern province. Both villages lie in the path of a proposed road linking oil wells in the south to a larger oilfield run by the government at Adar Yel 75 miles to the north.
Western investigators and relief workers believe that the government coordinated the attacks in order to open new oilfields in regions long occupied by south Sudanese Christians. The goal is to keep Sudan's potentially lucrative oil industry locked in Khartoum's hands.
Chinese workers for Petrodar, operated by China National Petroleum Corp. and other partners, drilled three oil wells near Longochok prior to the attack. They also completed a hard-surface road connecting the area to Adar Yel oilfields.
Another road was completed in 2002 from Adar Yel to Southern Blue Nile. Government forces attacked three villages near that road construction site as well, killing perhaps 1,000 or more civilians. It's also in an area of south Sudan dominated by Christians.
Longochok is 35 miles from Nasir, a refuge for Nubian Christians during the Crusades and much later the site of the first American mission in south Sudan, begun under Presbyterians Elbert McCreery and Thomas Lambie.
Attacks on isolated rural villages have been a long-standing government tactic for securing oil reserves. The government has already cleared hundreds of villages in Western Upper Nile the same way. Canadian, European, and Asian oil firms developed drilling operations under government auspices, and the oil dollars flow to Khartoum.
Beyond increasing oil production at the expense of human life, road construction has strategic implications. South Sudan has few paved surfaces and, according to analyst Eric Reeves, a professor at Smith College, "This elevated, all-weather oil road ... can easily serve as a means for Khartoum to project military power, including troop transport."
The framework for the talks includes a Civilian Protection Monitoring Team (CPMT)-set up by U.S. special envoy John Danforth-to investigate potential abuses of the current ceasefire. Both sides agreed starting a year ago to allow the U.S.-led teams into their territory. The findings are used to advise Congress under the Sudan Peace Act and to inform U.S. officials monitoring peace negotiations.
Early on CPMT issued hard-hitting reports about government attacks in Western Upper Nile. In April the government suspended flight privileges for the CPMT and forced it to close its offices in south Sudan. Investigations resumed under retired Army Gen. Charles Baumann. His two recent reports concerning Eastern Upper Nile conflicted with accounts of villagers and aid workers.
CPMT said the attack on Longochok, which included the killing of pastor Jacob Manyiel, was "unsubstantiated." Its report of the incident states, "CPMT strongly suggests that it was the SPLM/A ... not the [government of Sudan] or its militia that contributed to the death of Pastor Jacob Manyiel as well as indeterminate number of people."
The report acknowledges that much of its investigation is based on interviews "via the telephone to sources in the Eastern Upper Nile Region"-an area where few villagers and probably only government sources have telephones. Eyewitnesses noted in the report have Arab names, in an area where nearly all residents have Christian names.
"They did not interview the real villagers," said Dennis Bennett, director of Servant's Heart Relief, a group operating schools and health programs in Eastern Upper Nile. Mr. Bennett toured the attacked villages after receiving firsthand reports from colleagues. He interviewed villagers who verified the attacks from government-supported militias. He also mapped and toured new oil roads and oil-drilling areas, developments not mentioned in the CPMT reports.
Negotiators on both sides of the Sudan conflict commenced negotiations last week with both wealth- and power-sharing arrangements outstanding. Whether U.S monitors are undermining south Sudanese aspirations will weigh on rebel leaders seeking an official stake in a new and democratic Sudan.
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.