Is it safe?
RU-486 is dangerous for unborn children, but what about their mothers?
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
Rep. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill in the House last year that would have required a doctor's prescription for the abortion drug combination known as RU-486.
This week he's planning to send a letter to HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson to ask him what he can do to assure women's health in the wake of revelations from RU-486's manufacturer, Danco, that six women have developed serious illnesses and two have died after the taking the drug. (Danco cautioned that no causal relationship between the drug and the medical problems has been established.)
Mr. Thompson told pro-abortion Republicans last year that the Food and Drug Administration would not revisit its controversial approval of RU-486. The agency has been without a commissioner since Jane Henney, who approved the abortion drug cocktail in the fall of 2000, stepped down when President Clinton left office. Mr. Thompson recently named food and agriculture specialist Lester Crawford the deputy commissioner, and his tenure as the de facto FDA commissioner may last the rest of the first Bush term unless Congress resists.
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.