How singlehood hurts societies | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

How singlehood hurts societies


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

One web publication to add to your reading list for is New Geography, edited by the very perceptive Joel Kotkin. He has long been noting the harmful economic effects of decreased childbearing, and in a post this week on his own site he noted, “Conservatives also seem to have a hard time admitting that one major culprit—particularly in the United States and East Asian countries such as Singapore—is modern capitalism. Young workers building their careers can face consuming demands for long work hours and substantial amounts of travel. Many confront a choice between a career and family.”

Kotkin continued, “For hard-pressed low-wage workers, raising children can be even harder. Indeed, much of the decline in child-rearing in the U.S. can be traced to a fall-off among immigrants, particularly Latinos, who fared particularly poorly in the long recession.” He noted, “Social conservatives also need to champion more than the narrowly defined ‘natural family.’ Many children, whether because of divorce or diverse family circumstances, must look to someone other than their birth parents for nurturing. Adoptive parents, grandmothers, uncles or aunts or other sorts of extended-family units also need to be cherished as committed caregivers.”

Kotkin was particularly critical of the left: “Many Democrats praise the rise of ‘singlism’—demonstrated by the women in their 40s who never had offspring. This cohort has more than doubled since 1976. Pollsters like Stan Greenberg hail single women as ‘the largest progressive voting bloc in the country,’ and Ruy Texeira, a leading political scientist, asserts that singletons are critical to the ‘emerging Democratic majority.’ … Many progressives don’t seem to care much if the birthrate falls. Some green activists seem to actually prefer it—perhaps viewing offspring, particularly in wealthy countries, as unwanted carbon emitters.”

Kotkin reminded us: “Before signing on to a low-fertility agenda, American progressives as well as conservatives might want to consider the long-term consequences. The long fertility-rate declines in Europe and Japan occurred as economic growth flagged. Diminishing expectations of the future, painfully evident in countries such as Spain, Italy and Greece, are now further depressing marriage and childbirth.”


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments