“Gladiator II” review: Uninspiring Roman fiction | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Gladiator II

MOVIE | Long-awaited sequel tramples on the historical record and offers an unsympathetic hero


Aidan Monaghan / Paramount Pictures via AP

<em>Gladiator II</em>
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Rated R • Theaters

Almost a quarter century after the original film, director Ridley Scott has created a sequel to Gladiator. That film, in which Russell Crowe played Maximus, a general-turned-gladiator, won the Academy Award for best picture of the year 2000 and is beloved by legions of fans. With Hollywood desperate to tap into Gen X nostalgia, it was only a matter of time before we stepped back into the arena.

Gladiator II takes place 20 years after the death of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, the event that set the original film in motion. The emperor’s grandson Lucius (Paul Mescal) is living in exile in North Africa. Despotic twin emperors Caracalla and Geta (Fred Hechinger and Joseph Quinn) now rule Rome, and after the Roman army, led by Marcus Acacius (Pedro Pascal), destroys Lucius’ home and sells him into slavery, Lucius vows revenge. He’s aided in his quest by Macrinus (Denzel Washington), a former slave with designs of his own. Lucius’ plan is complicated by the fact that Acacius is married to his mother, Lucilla (Connie Nielsen reprising).

In the original Gladiator, Scott took certain liberties with the historical record, but with this sequel, he shows an utter disdain for it. Gladiator II isn’t so much historical fiction as it is historically inspired fantasy. Scott ignores chronology, invents wars, and reimagines the sibling emperors as cartoonish, albeit bloodthirsty, buffoons. He pushes the sets, the costumes, and the action sequences beyond reality into the bizarrely grotesque. The R rating is solely based on violence.

The sheer silliness of it all might be forgivable, if the film possessed a compelling story. Alas, it does not. Scott indicts systemic injustice, which robs the narrative of any personal investment. Lucius is neither sympathetic nor inspiring. But the film’s greatest crime might be that it undercuts the poignancy of the original film by rendering Maximus’ death meaningless. Gladiator II will not echo in eternity.


Collin Garbarino

Collin is WORLD’s arts and culture editor. He is a graduate of the World Journalism Institute, the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Louisiana State University and resides with his wife and four children in Sugar Land, Texas.

@collingarbarino

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments