Meetings of minds | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Freud’s Last Session

MOVIE | Intriguing fictitious setup pits Sigmund Freud against C.S. Lewis, but the film meanders


Sony Pictures

<em>Freud’s Last Session</em>
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Rated PG-13
Theaters

It’s the autumn of 1939. War between England and Germany has just broken out, but another sort of battle is about to begin. In his last days, Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, sends for C.S. Lewis, the Oxford don and apologist, so the two can debate the existence of God.

This fictitious setup is the premise for Freud’s Last Session, a new movie that adapts the play of the same name, which in turn was inspired by the book The Question of God by Armand Nicholi.

Anthony Hopkins plays Freud as a crotchety atheist with a bit of a vicious streak. He feels his own death looming, but he nevertheless longs for intellectual stimulation. The younger Lewis, played with earnestness by Matthew Goode, makes for an ideal sparring partner. Both actors give strong performances, though quite frankly Goode is too good-looking with his full head of hair to make a convincing Lewis.

Despite Hopkins’ and Goode’s achievements, the script doesn’t live up to the promising premise. The film has an irritating habit of wandering away from the main action to delve into fanciful ­subplots that have little to do with the clash of two powerful minds. The most egregious meandering deals with Freud’s daughter Anna, whom the film depicts as struggling with her own lesbianism, contrary to the historical Anna’s stance on homosexuality.

The main characters spend a lot of time asking each other questions, sometimes quite emotionally, but the protagonists offer little in the way of answers. Viewers familiar with the writings of the two men will catch snippets of real-life quotations in their ­fictitious conversation, but the dialogue seems more of a verbal collage than a true synthesis of their worldviews.


Collin Garbarino

Collin is WORLD’s arts and culture editor. He is a graduate of the World Journalism Institute, the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Louisiana State University and resides with his wife and four children in Sugar Land, Texas.

@collingarbarino

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments