Foreign policy choices | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Foreign policy choices


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

Israel, American cultural imperialism, American physical imperialism - those are three reasons our Middle Eastern adversaries often cite for their opposition to the U.S. Are all three excuses to cover up Islamic weakness?

Sure, Israel is a thorn in their side, but it shouldn't be: If Middle Eastern governments worked together with entrepreneurial Israelis the whole region could prosper. The problem, though, is that Muslim governments traditionally accept Jews (and Christians) only if they are subservient. (See the scholarly research of historian Bat Ye'Or.) An independent Israel is a daily reminder of Muslim weakness.

Sure, American sexual mores - too much flesh displayed by day and adultery at night - also rub Muslim traditionalists the wrong way - but they could ignore life within "the Great Satan" if so many of their people did not find American culture appealing. That they are tantalized is another sign of weakness within a religion that does not acknowledge original sin.

Sure, European imperialists messed with the Middle East early in the 20th century - but the United States has liberated countries, not enslaved them. (Remember Colin Powell's statement concerning US action in World Wars I and 2: We only took the ground needed to bury our dead.)

By saying all three of these are "excuses," I don't want to minimize the anger our enemies feel about Israel taking "their" land and America flaunting its freedom. But take away those complaints and we would still have to face the prospect of war, for the real reason for conflict is that the United States is rich and Muslim countries (although not their rulers) are poor.

Poor people normally have two choices. They can work hard so their children will have better lives. Or, they can overthrow their rulers and take their wealth (but even if it is spread out it doesn't go very far). The second choice often becomes prime when leaders define covetousness as justice.

In response to such covetousness Americans have three choices. We can make ourselves poor so others won't be jealous. We can ostentatiously kiss up to those who covet, giving awards with the goal of buying off the most militant. Or, we can do what we can to help other societies become rich themselves.


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments