Conservative philanthropy: Ignoring the poor? | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Conservative philanthropy: Ignoring the poor?


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

When Mitt Romney made a political mistake by being honest-he infamously announced that he was "not concerned about the very poor"-he confirmed "one of the oldest stereotypes in American politics: that conservatives are uncaring, hardhearted skinflints, unworthy to govern a people known for charity and compassion." That's the good analysis of the Hudson Institute's William Schambra in a Chronicle of Philanthropy article last week, "Is Conservative Philanthropy Ignoring the Poor?"

Schambra, a former Bradley Foundation officer, noted, "Conservative philanthropy once helped dispel that stereotype by developing thoughtful private approaches to poverty. Unhappily, it now simply reinforces unfavorable impressions by focusing on short-term political advocacy rather than long-term civic problem solving." He's right. During the 1990s, foundations like Bradley advanced ideas like school choice and faith-based poverty fighting. This was small-government compassionate conservatism: "While reducing government presence, such programs would also resuscitate the innate capacities of vibrant local communities to solve their own problems according to their own values and beliefs."

But now, Schambra writes, "The patient pursuit of long-term vision has given way to the lunge for an immediate legislative or electoral win on a specific, narrow-bore issue closely reflecting conservative ideology. Grant makers expect sharply defined, short-term, measurable political outcomes rather than barely perceptible, immeasurable shifts in long-term social attitudes. The quick political pay-off has replaced the gradual reshaping of the social and cultural environment."

Schambra offers a proposal: "For conservatives to escape not only the appearance but also the damning reality of hardheartedness, their philanthropies must devote serious resources once again to the revival of civil society. Above all, they must locate, support, and become directly involved with the grass-roots groups in their own communities that best demonstrate the power of civil society." Amen.


Marvin Olasky

Marvin is the former editor in chief of WORLD, having retired in January 2022, and former dean of World Journalism Institute. He joined WORLD in 1992 and has been a university professor and provost. He has written more than 20 books, including Reforming Journalism.

@MarvinOlasky

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments