Cancerous cells? | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Cancerous cells?

The cell-phone-as-health-hazard cause is all but dead.


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

The cell-phone-as-health-hazard cause is all but dead. U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake on March 6 tossed out five class-action suits that claimed Nokia and Motorola don't warn people about the alleged risk of brain tumors.

Despite several studies that have found no adverse health effects from the use of cell phones, the plaintiffs claimed that thousands of cell phones were defective and unreasonably dangerous. They demanded that wireless manufacturers include headsets to protect users from radiation.

In September, Judge Blake dismissed an $800 million lawsuit brought by a Baltimore neurologist who claimed cell phones gave him brain cancer. The law firm of Baltimore Orioles owner Peter Angelos, which helped file the five suits dismissed this month, brought that suit as well.

Judge Blake ruled that federal standards preempt the plaintiffs' state law claims. Keeping the cases alive would usurp the regulatory function entrusted by Congress to the Federal Communications Commission and other agencies, she said.

The ruling comes at a good time for the struggling telecommunications industry. A string of successful radiation suits could generate high damages, bad publicity, and a public health scare.

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments