Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

A closer look at claims of election fraud

Top stories on social media focus on voting irregularities in the presidential election. What’s true?

Poll workers sort early and absentee ballots at the Kenosha Municipal building on Election Day, in Kenosha, Wis. AP Photo/Wong Maye-E, File

A closer look at claims of election fraud
You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get into news that is grounded in facts and Biblical truth for as low as $2.99 per month.


Already a member? Sign in.

Since Nov. 3, political conversations dominating social media platforms have centered on voting irregularities and possible fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Many Republicans’ perception of widespread election fraud has undermined confidence in the election results, which have not yet been officially certified but by all current counts appear to be in former Vice President Joe Biden’s favor.

This has some parallels to 2016, when 85 percent of Democrats said Russia meddled in the presidential election. But fallout from this election has included death threats against local election officials running the vote counts, calls for election officials to resign, and President Donald Trump raising questions about the election’s validity (his legal team has taken several cases to court). Data analysis of social media posts receiving the most engagements this week shows how quickly election claims—some true, some not—spread.

Priests for Life, a pro-life organization based in New York, sent a fundraising email to supporters this week noting, “The election is far from over ... especially when you consider the rampant voter fraud is being investigated and revealed.”

Some of those online conversations are having real-world consequences, as prominent Republicans call the election into doubt. U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr authorized immediate federal probes into fraud, and Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a Republican, unveiled a $1 million fund that would reward reports of voter fraud. Georgia’s two Republican senators have called on Georgia’s Republican secretary of state to resign because he “failed to deliver honest and transparent elections.” Republicans in other states have similarly attacked local secretaries of state and called for their resignations.

The Trump campaign has argued thousands of voters in Clark County, Nev., voted from out of state when they weren’t eligible. Clark County’s registrar said state law allows the mostly military population in question to vote while out of state.

Still, officials have found some cases of voter fraud. A Texas social worker was charged with registering to vote 67 residents from an assisted living facility who had intellectual and developmental disabilities and could not consent. In Kentucky, a now-fired postal worker was charged with discarding 112 ballots that voters had requested.

And officials have found voting error and election administrator incompetence. A clerk in a small town in Michigan failed to update election software, which state officials said resulted in the county initially showing a landslide victory for Biden. Trump won the county when canvassers reviewed the results. New York City mailed 100,000 faulty absentee ballots with the wrong names printed on the outside. It sent those ballots out again with the correct names.

One data analysis from Stanford University and others noted that given the hundreds of millions of votes coming in from counties across the country, “an absence of any irregularities would in and of itself be irregular.”

But instances of voter fraud or mistakes so far don’t amount to numbers big enough to change the projected outcome in several states Trump would need to flip in order to win. Election experts have argued for months that because local officials administer elections by their own rules, a national fraud scheme would be nearly impossible to pull off. The most significant voter fraud cases have happened in local races, where local officials could control small numbers of votes, such as a case this year in a New Jersey city council race.

Widespread fraud is “just not feasible,” said Michael Adams, the Republican secretary of state for Kentucky, in an interview with Yahoo News. Adams was also an election law adviser to Vice President Mike Pence.

A swirl of information on social media deserves careful sifting, as Exodus 23:1 reminds us: “You shall not spread a false report.” Here we look at six stories and social media posts this week that generated the most engagement, according to data analysis firm NewsWhip. Most sowed doubts about the electoral process, and some shared false information. These weren’t necessarily the most popular posts on Facebook, but generated the most public engagement.

Workers in Pennsylvania prepare main-in ballots for counting.

Workers in Pennsylvania prepare main-in ballots for counting. AP Photo/Julio Cortez

(1) Posts from President Trump consistently generate the most public engagement on Facebook. The top Facebook political post on Nov. 9 was from Trump, quoting Newt Gingrich: “This was a stolen election. Best pollster in Britain wrote this morning that this clearly was a stolen election, that it’s impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states. Where it mattered, they stole what they had to steal.” The post had more than 1 million interactions in 24 hours, according to NewsWhip.

The “best pollster in Britain” whom Gingrich referenced was Patrick Basham, a columnist for the Sunday Express, who before the election had predicted that Trump would win in a landslide. Post-election Basham argued that his prediction of a landslide was “off” because of “voter fraud.”

On Nov. 10, the top post on Facebook by engagement was President Trump’s post that he had won Georgia. Trump is currently behind Biden in Georgia by about 14,000 votes, although Georgia is planning a hand recount.

(2) Other top posts by engagement include headlines from Breitbart and The Daily Wire about voting irregularities. A Breitbart piece with the headline “Investigators Dispatched After Fulton County Discovers ‘Issue’ with Ballot Reporting” had the second most social media engagement for Nov. 9 among political stories, according to NewsWhip. That article claimed the “issue,” which turned out to be 342 ballots that needed to be rescanned, might “significantly affect the current Biden lead in Georgia.”

Another top story from Nov. 9, by social media engagements, was from The Daily Wire: “Wisconsin Election Commission Might Have Violated State Law By Allowing Clerks To ‘Fix’ Ballots, Report Says.” Wisconsin’s rules on absentee ballots are stricter than in other states. It requires a witness signature on absentee ballots, for example. The report cited in the Daily Wire story consisted of a quote from retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, saying that the Wisconsin Election Commission had violated state law with its guidance for clerks handling ballots missing witness addresses.

But the state election commission, consisting of Republicans and Democrats, had unanimously decided on guidance before the 2016 election: Clerks could fill in witness address information from a voter database if necessary. The clerks must fill in the address in red ink in case there are any questions about particular votes. Biden currently leads Wisconsin by about 21,000 votes.

(3) Most Facebook activity happens in private groups, which often link to YouTube videos which can spread misinformation more easily without being flagged by social media platforms. One of the top YouTube political videos by engagement recently claimed RealClearPolitics had rescinded its prediction of a Biden win of Pennsylvania. This is false, as RealClearPolitics had never called Pennsylvania. Biden currently leads the vote in that state by about 47,000 votes.

(4) On Nov. 10, three of the Top 10 stories by engagement on social media were Barr’s authorization of immediate federal probes into voting irregularities. In previous elections, the Department of Justice has waited to begin such investigations until after states certify their election results. After Barr announced the new policy, the head of the DOJ division that prosecutes election crimes resigned.

(5) Top QAnon social media influencers, as well as outlets like the One America News Network, focused on Dominion Voting Systems, which provides election equipment to many states. The social media influencers say Dominion’s systems were “glitching” in favor of Biden. RoseUncharted and Praying Medic, two top QAnon influencers on social media, both have posted repeatedly about Dominion. They claim that Dominion is partnered with the Clinton Global Initiative. Dominion did commit in 2014 to donating voting machines for overseas election efforts through the Delian Project, a Canadian group. The Clinton Global Initiative announced that project on its website, but Delian shows no ongoing partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative.

Dominion provided the voting equipment in Antrim County, Mich., which initially showed Biden as winning, then flipped to Trump after canvassers reviewed the numbers. Michigan officials said that was human error from the county clerk uploading Antrim’s results. The Dominion machines correctly tabulated the votes, but a Michigan company called ElectionSource provided the election software, which the secretary of state said the clerk should have updated before uploading results.

“Election clerks work extremely hard and do their work with integrity,” wrote Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson in a statement about the voting errors. “They are human beings, and sometimes make mistakes. However, there are many checks and balances that ensure mistakes can be caught and corrected.”

(6) A Nov. 7 Newsmax video was one of the top posts on Facebook (with 15 million views) and included claims about dead people voting, another theme among popular posts. A Twitter user, @Fleccas, also spread many of these claims in viral tweets. He highlighted a William Bradley, born in 1902 and died in 1984, who voted by absentee ballot in Michigan. That turned out to be Bradley’s son, also named William Bradley, who lives at the same address as his deceased father.

Dead people did vote in the election, legitimately and illegitimately. Some states allow votes from people who died before Election Day but were alive when they submitted mail-in ballots or early votes in person. Some states also put the year 1900 or the date 01/01/01 as a placeholder for registered voters whose age is unknown, which has raised suspicions in certain cases.

Fraudulent votes from dead people were cast, for both Trump and Biden voters, but so far there is no evidence of it in large numbers. Pennsylvania authorities charged one man, a registered Republican, with attempting to vote via mail-in ballot for his deceased mother. The county said it was the first voter fraud arrest in 30 years. New York authorities charged a registered Democrat for doing the same. Nevada officials discovered at least two ballots in Clark County that came from deceased voters.

The Department of Homeland Security has a long explanation of how local election officials regularly purge voter rolls based on death records.

“While there can be some lag time between a person’s death and their removal from the voter registration list, which can lead to some mail-in ballots being delivered to addresses of deceased individuals, death records provide a strong audit trail to identify any illegal attempts to cast ballots on behalf of deceased individuals,” DHS wrote.

Emily Belz

Emily is a senior reporter for WORLD Magazine. She is a World Journalism Institute graduate and previously reported for the New York Daily News, The Indianapolis Star, and Philanthropy magazine. Emily resides in New York City.



Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.

Russell in Japan

Thanks for chasing down these stories. Journalism is supposed to be about digging out the facts, not simply repeating unjustified claims for the sake of clicks and likes.  

Gregory P

In accordance with the Constitution for the United States (Article II, Section 1), before entering "the Execution of his Office," Donald J. Trump swore this Oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”  

Fraud in the election process is obviously an attack on the Constitution and the people of the United States.  The Governor and Supreme Court and other officials of the State of Pennsylvania violated the Constitution of the United States.  In violation of laws officials prevented Republican observers from observing the counting of over a hundred thousand votes in Pennsylvania and other states.  Why?  How can we have confidence in the results?  There is evidence of fraud, ballots from people not registered in the state where the ballot was cast, whether the actual people are registered elsewhere or are dead.   There have been reports of tens of such ballots in places, maybe hundreds, maybe thousands.  Certainly some may be for Trump, but probably the vast majority of illegal ballots are for Biden.  And how much fraud is acceptable?  Do we have to wait until we see tens of thousands of illegal ballots in a state before we are concerned?  Several races have turned from being called for the Democrat candidate to the Republican.  And there have been several who have indicated not just the possiblity but the probability of machines being manipulated to change vote totals, and testimony that that has been done.  

President Trump has the duty to check for fraud in the election and should be encouraged to do so.  Meanwhile, Christians should be praying for fraud to be exposed.  What is wrong with demanding that every valid ballot be counted, and every illegal one be discarded?  


Agree also. 


Actually Cyborg3, World Magazine is one of the few places we can get objective reporting. Do you really want non-objective reporting? Would you want your news to be biased towards the right any more than to the left? Do we want news reporters to declare, "I'm going to go change the way things are!" Isn't it more important that they just declare things the way they are and let the chips fall where they may? Isn't truth the ultimate goal even if we don't like it? Perhaps WM doesn't always get to the whole truth, but at least they make a concerted effort to do so (and on a limited budget). Keep up the good work World. and may God bless your efforts!

Steve SoCal

I'm not making some big partisan statement here, but I honestly don't understand the title of this article, because from my perspective it doesn't describe the contents of the piece very well.  The subtitle is closer to what seems to have been intended, a look at how social media rumors can be misleading. 

I was hoping this article would really be a thorough look at the various claims of fraud, but it seems to be selective in only addressing certain claims.  It also seems to accept some easy answers from officials without much rigor in evaluating them. 

Why does this piece, dubbed a closer look at fraud accusations, seem to not seriously look into the sworn affidavits by witnesses of fraud that we are told exist in the hundreds.  For example, what about the person who claims to have witnessed ballots being back-dated in the thousands?  Has that been debunked?

One of the things this article accepts is the straw man that there was no "widespread fraud", which people seem to take as meaning a huge and well-coordinated multi-state plan of action.  The claim seems to be that this is impossible with the various checks and balances, and so the minor fraud and mistakes that invariably crop up in such a huge undertaking really don't matter, because they won't change the ultimate outcome. 

I know for a fact from seeing it in action around the world that corruption can take root in a general sense in a culture (or subculture of a certain party or group) in such a way that people will do their little part to try to swing things, which is not the kind of dirty process we want in American democracy, and if you add up a bunch of small efforts, there is a chance it can actually make a difference. 

I disagree with people, particularly on the left, who want to minimize less-than-massive efforts to corrupt the system for selecting our government leadership.  That is a rapidly downward slippery slope for a society.


What leads me to believe something fishy happened in this election is: 1) Biden had virtually no campaign or excitement from Americans. Even here in the Portland area I saw few placards or bumper stickers for Biden. How could he possibly have gotten record-breaking votes? Trump even got record breaking votes, so clearly former Trump voters didn't just switch their votes to Biden. And what did the Biden campaign spend all their money on? 2) The obsession with pushing mail-in voting by the left was strange. If standing in line to buy groceries is safe, why not waiting in line to vote? Democrats are notorious for being against any laws that might prevent voter fraud (ie voter ID laws). 3) After seeing the complete level of bold and blatant corruption behind Russia-gate, I just wouldn't put it past the Trump-hating leftists to manage organizing fraud attempts across the country. Their hate is just so intense. 4) Main-stream media has so immediately and thoroughly rejected any discussion or investigation into allegations. If Biden had raised these questions, I think they would have been all over it.

More than anything, I just want the candidate to win that the American people (though a tiny majority) chose. If excessive voter fraud did happen and our media and leaders don't get to the bottom of it, I fear for our republic.

Deb O

Cyborg3, please read dcsfoyle again. Every word is what I want to say to you as well. 

West Gramma

I wonder how much of this would be happening if Donald Trump were normal? (That is, as a politician, if he actually believed in our democracy and could accept his loss as most grown up people have learned to accept when they lose?) I believe this event will go down in history alongside the witch hunt of McCarthyism. I find the whole thing very unusual and very odd. It's truly weird. It's been a whole week since Biden was projected winner, and no widespread, coordinated fraud has been found. While part of me is horrified at what is happening, another part of me wants the exposure to continue, so that the cancer can be removed at its root. Although World has yet to take an editorial stance against false claims, I appreciate your having reported what's going on as a neutral spectator. Otherwise, Cyborg 3 would not have been upset.


I appreciate the effort but am curious why the subtitle focus is only on social media claims?


Cyborg, this is a well documented article full of pertinent facts, not a propaganda piece filled with blustery generalities.

I'm glad, that unlike many these days, you are taking the time to visit WORLD Magazine's website even though you nearly always disagree with their political content. The next step is to believe that it's possible that you're looking at things the wrong way round and that, by God's grace, WORLD is still the biblically-influenced, truth-seeking news source it has been for 30+ years.


A recurring theme here... People rely entirely too much on Facebook and YouTube for information. Not sure how we fix that, but it's a problem across almost the entire spectrum of society. There is mostly no checking or review before information goes to FB or YT. And yet, it drives public opinion like wildfire (and not just on elections).