Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

A book that asks: “Hath God really said?”

The peril of not believing what the Bible says about itself

You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism and commentary without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get into news that is grounded in facts and Biblical truth for as low as $3.99 per month.


Already a member? Sign in.

DISCLAIMER: I was the café server at the seminary where the man who wrote the book I am about to critique was a Bible professor. There is no reason why you should pay attention to what a turkey wrap maker has to say except that the Bible itself is the great leveler of credentials: God reveals to children what He keeps from the wise and learned. Be good Bereans and judge for yourself.

I came across the book while cleaning at church (I also have “assistant custodian” in my impressive resumé) and read and returned it before it would be missed. The title is The Bible Tells Me So, but I hope you will not buy it unless you have strong faith going into it, because otherwise you won’t have coming out.

The professor’s claim (I will use his own words) is that “God never told the Israelites to kill the Canaanites. The Israelites believed that God told them to kill the Canaanites.”

In later chapters Peter Enns briefly treats other Bible teachings that “ain’t necessarily so” (to quote dope peddler and Scripture skeptic Sportin’ Life in Porgy and Bess), but these have the feel of filler, and it is clear that the Israelite extermination of the Canaanites at God’s direction (Joshua; Deuteronomy 7:1-5; 20:16-18) is the tail that wags the dog for Enns’ thesis. He repeatedly says things like, “It’s hard to appeal to the God of the Bible to condemn genocide today when the God of the Bible commended genocide yesterday.” And, “[God] comes across as a perennially hacked-off warrior god, more Megathon than heavenly father.”

“Joshua fit the battle of Jericho” (African American spiritual) never happened like that, says Enns. It’s all ancient Near Eastern propaganda. Israelite braggadocio. Rather, “it does seem that a nation eventually called ‘Israel’ probably came on the scene gradually and relatively peacefully.” Enns’ social justice sensibilities are thus spared, but the price tag is high: The man has just stolen your Bible.

The funny thing about heresy is that no one who falls into it thinks himself a heretic.

For when you, simple Christian, read that Joshua commands the officers to prepare provisions for the next day’s attack (Joshua 1:11); tells the Reubenites, Gadites, and half tribe of Manasseh they have to join in the operation before settling down with their wives on the east side of the Jordan; sends out two spies to report back on the battle readiness of Jericho; spares the prostitute Rahab for aiding the spies; instructs his people to sanctify themselves before the battle; marches with his men around Jericho; deals with Achan’s costly dereliction of duty; succeeds at Ai on the second try—you have to remind yourself that all this never happened.

Well. If the Canaanite conquest didn’t happen, then what part of the Bible did happen, Professor? Certainly not the books of Genesis and Exodus, says Enns. Creation story? Warmed-over Babylonian Enuma Elish. Adam and Eve? There were people living before them. Worldwide flood? Knockoff of a Mesopotamian myth. We are left with, as Amos would say, “two legs or a piece of an ear.”

But hold on! If we are supposed to read the Bible not believing what it says about itself in plain English (or Hebrew), then what content do we replace that with, pray tell? Whatever content Enns suggests, of course. Let go of your insistence on a “modern kind of history,” he says, meaning by the phrase “modern kind of history” the empirical facts. Nevertheless, Scripture still cries through the ages, “Let God be true though every one were a liar” (Romans 3:4).

The funny thing about heresy is that no one who falls into it thinks himself a heretic but a lonely champion of enlightenment. Some things in the Bible are hard to understand, but in the main the Word of God is clear. As a fine poem, with its hidden parts, is to be preferred over “Mary Had a Little Lamb,” with its transparency, so we revel in what is revealed in Scripture, and wait with eagerness to someday understand its baffling aspects. Even Revelation, most enigmatic book in the canon, comes with a blessing on the one who reads and him who hears and takes to heart.

Enns’ book would be better retitled “Hath God Really Said?”

Andrée Seu Peterson

Andrée is a senior writer for WORLD Magazine. Her commentary has been compiled into three books including Won't Let You Go Unless You Bless Me. Andrée resides in Philadelphia, Penn.


Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register, subscribe, or login to comment on this article.

Neil Evans

This is perhaps the most important topic mankind can ever discuss. Everyone has truth sources they religiously live by. Too much of the time we live with ourselves as the final source/judge of what is true. The consequence is seen in every malady our world sees or ever has seen. It is the result of the blind arrogance of the one who first questioned the truthfulness of God. In doing so he placed himself on a very high pedistal. His self-deception seeks only to kill and devour those whom God seeks to give them His Life. To question the truthfulness of God and His Bible we must also place ourselves on that impossibly high pedistal. The world has yet to demonstrate a more truthful and beneficial source of Life than the Bible.


Spiritually, I was born and grew up in the land that Peter Enns invites us to.  It is not the Promised Land.  It is Egypt.  It is bondage.  It is oppression.  I left that land 40 years ago this year and I will not go back.


This may be of interest: https://www.alisachilders.com/blog/my-response-to-pete-enns-the-alisa-childers-podcast-39.