Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

Student sues school over girl in boys’ locker room

Lawsuit claims administrator told the student if he didn’t like the transgender policy, he could opt for homeschooling


Student sues school over girl in boys’ locker room

A high school junior is suing his Boyertown, Pa., school district after administrators told him he could either “tolerate” having a biological female share his locker room or withdraw and be homeschooled.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court calls on the district to rescind its secretly implemented policy granting transgender students access to the private facilities of their choice.

Without notifying parents or students, administrators at Boyertown Area School District initiated the policy midway through last semester. The complainant, cited as Joel Doe in court documents, knew nothing about the plan when he began changing clothes for PE class in October. Undressed to his underwear, Doe realized a female student—wearing only shorts and a bra—was in the locker room with him.

“Humiliated” and “embarrassed,” he and several other classmates notified Assistant Principal Wayne Foley after class, according to the lawsuit. Foley allegedly told the male students to “tolerate” the situation and make changing in front of a female as “natural” as possible.

“There is a level of egregious, callous disregard for the students,” said Randy Wenger, the Alliance Defending Freedom-affiliated attorney representing the unidentified male student and his parents.

Doe’s parents, listed as John and Jane Doe, filed the lawsuit on behalf of their minor child. Foley, Principal Brett Cooper, and Superintendent Richard Faidley are co-defendants in the case. The district has until April 4 to respond.

“We are committed and confident that working together we can reach a satisfactory resolution that is consistent with our mission ‘to enable all students to succeed in a changing world,’” Faidley said in a press release issued today.

Faidley reasserted the district’s commitment to the transgender policy, which he claims complies with “the law of the land,” and said the district is seeking guidance from the State Department of Education, the administration, and school board.

In another recent Pennsylvania case, three male students who identify as female sued a school district for access to the girls’ restrooms. The judge ordered the district to allow open access to school restrooms while the lawsuit proceeds.

Wenger said that case is still pending, not precedent-setting, and not applicable to Boyertown, which involves locker rooms, not restrooms.

The Boyertown plaintiffs asked administrators to rescind their policy because it violated their son’s privacy and Pennsylvania state law requiring sex-segregated facilities on all school campuses. According to the lawsuit, Cooper said “he would not do anything because Joel Doe can simply change in the nurse’s office from now on if he does not want to change around people of the opposite sex.”

Wenger did not know whether the transgender student had been offered the same accommodation in order to avoid any conflict associated with using the boys’ locker room. But transgender advocates have refused similar suggestions in other cases, calling them discriminatory and a violation of the transgender students’ rights.

Following the locker room incident, Doe avoided using the boys’ restrooms all day for fear of encountering the female student. He also took a failing grade in PE class for each day he refused to dress out. Changing clothes in the nurse’s office did not remedy the situation because he still had to enter the boys’ locker room to store his clothes.

“Now he and the other boys are left without a boy’s room,” Wenger said.

Following multiple meetings with district officials, the Doe family was told “that the school was no longer going to discuss this issue with them or any parents,” according to the lawsuit. And Faidley allegedly told the parents that if using the nurse’s bathroom was not acceptable to their son, “he could just withdraw from school and be homeschooled.”

And that, Wenger claims, is a violation of Title IX. Typically used to defend women’s educational pursuits in publicly funded schools, the federal statute also protects teenage boys pushed from their designated sex-specific private spaces by a policy accommodating a student of the opposite sex. Last year, the Obama administration directed schools to interpret protections in Title IX to include gender identity. The Trump administration rescinded that directive last month.

Even without federal support, Wenger said local school districts continue to do “the wrong thing” by forcing students into untenable situations that push moral and social boundaries surrounding intimacy and personal privacy.

“The adults are putting these kids in a place where standing up to this is awkward,” he said, noting his client and the lawsuit are the talk of the school. “It’s hard enough to do school. Who wants to be that person everybody is talking about?”

Bonnie Pritchett Bonnie is a correspondent for WORLD. She is a graduate of World Journalism Institute and the University of Texas School of Journalism. Bonnie resides with her family in League City, Texas.


Please wait while we load the latest comments...


Please register or subscribe to comment on this article.


Question to ask the Adminstrator and School Board Members in Court under Oath:

"What level of responsibilty are they going to accept is sex occurs (consensual or non-sonsenual) after teaching homone filled teanagers how to perfom sex and then forcing them to be naked together?"


The very sad but well put truth.  Given the stand so many Christians took concerning SSM, the signs for standing against this are not good, yet "but God".


This is the fruit of trying to remove God from the public square.   The teaching of evolution leads to this.  But the evolution theory cannot answer the question why is it that world-wide there is a sense of shame over nakedness in the presence of others.  For some boys a girls there is a challenge in being seen without their clothes in the locker room with others of the same sex.  After Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, they also felt shame at being naked, and they were husband and wife, and no other person was there to observe them, but they still felt shame.  This sense of shame is still with us, and is a very strong evidence that the story of Adam and Eve is a true story, not a fable. Two other evidences in that story that we can take as evidene of its truth and accuracy are: 1) Adam and Eve tried to hide from God after their sin, and so do we try to hide from authorities after we do what we know is wrong. 2)Instead of admitting guilt in his wrong, Adam blames the Lord and Eve--the woman you gave to be with me, she gave to me and I ate.  We likewise find it very hard to admit, "I was wrong".  All three of these things point to the accuracy of the story, and then they also become a witness to the solution that we find in the Bible:  Mercy from God through faith in Jesus as our Saviour.  There is nothing in the Bible to tell us that God had to send Jesus to be our Saviour.  Love motivated Him to send his Son to receive punishment for our sins.  He is inviting all people everywhere to repent, (turn away from sin and toward God) and to believe in Jesus.  You don't have to take my word for it--it's written in the Bible, and there are more reasons to believe the Bible than just because I am saying it.  Thank you, World, for reporting on this sad story, the symptom of our deep problems in America.