States sue Trump for ending automatic birthright citizenship
Will Scharf, left, speaks with President Donald Trump as Trump signs executive orders at an indoor Presidential Inauguration parade event at Capital One Arena. Associated Press / Photo by Evan Vucci
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f52/f2f52918730ddbab9710371077b7405f6705b695" alt="States sue Trump for ending automatic birthright citizenship"
Eighteen states joined in a federal lawsuit on Tuesday pushing back against the Trump administration’s executive order ending automatic birthright citizenship for children born in the United States, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. Four other states filed a separate lawsuit later in the day, bringing the total to 22. The executive order is one of a swath of orders President Donald Trump signed after his Monday inauguration.
That executive order eliminates automatic U.S. citizenship for:
- Children whose mothers were in the United States illegally, and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or a lawful permanent residents at the time of the child’s birth.
- Children whose mothers were in the United States on a temporary basis—for example, visiting on student, work, or tourist visas—and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents at the time of birth.
The order described American citizenship as a priceless gift, adding that infants born to lawful U.S. citizens will still receive automatic citizenship.
What were the states’ arguments against ending automatic citizenship? Within hours of taking office, Trump attempted to nullify an American right that’s stood for over 150 years, according to the complaint. The right to automatic citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, which states that citizenship is conferred to all persons born in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, according to the filing. The president holds no constitutional power to set rules or conditions around birthright citizenship, the complaint continued, and Trump only enacted the order as his latest tactic to cut down on illegal immigration. New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin led the coalition of states from nearly every U.S. region, plus Hawaii.
How has the White House responded to the filing? Trump’s executive order insists that parents who are not legal U.S. citizens fail to meet the 14th Amendment's criteria of being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. White House Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields said the administration is ready for the legal battles following Trump’s orders, according to reporting by the Associated Press. The left can try fighting the will of the people or get on board and work alongside the president, he said.
Dig deeper: Read Josh Schumacher’s report on Trump’s additional day-one executive orders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3726/d3726bf266e2b00354b72097d51575502945a0fd" alt=""
An actual newsletter worth subscribing to instead of just a collection of links. —Adam
Sign up to receive The Sift email newsletter each weekday morning for the latest headlines from WORLD’s breaking news team.
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.