The consensus cracks

Editor's note: The following text is a transcript of a podcast story. To listen to the story, click on the arrow beneath the headline above.

MYRNA BROWN, HOST: Good morning! This is The World and Everything in It from listener-supported WORLD Radio. 

I’m Myrna Brown.

MARY REICHARD, HOST: And I’m Mary Reichard.

One of the world’s most respected hospitals has agreed to stop offering procedures aimed at sex change for minors.

WORLD commentator Daniel Suhr says the significance of that decision reaches far beyond the Cleveland Clinic.

DANIEL SUHR: Newsweek ranks the Cleveland Clinic as the second-best hospital in the world. Only the Mayo Clinic ranks higher.

Which is why this week’s announcement matters.

The Cleveland Clinic has agreed to settle a legal action with the U.S. Department of Justice. The case involved its past practice of offering sex-change procedures for minors.

The financial terms are noteworthy: The Clinic will pay a monetary penalty related to alleged insurance billing practices. It will also establish a $2 million fund to provide care for detransitioners.

But the most important part of the agreement is not the money.

For the next twenty years, Cleveland Clinic will not offer procedures aimed at facilitating a gender transition for minors. No surgeries. No cross-sex hormones. No puberty blockers.

That commitment alone would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.

This settlement follows another major agreement I told you about last week: Texas Children’s Hospital agreed to pay $10 million to resolve allegations related to similar practices.

At the time, I argued that a wave of accountability was approaching the medical institutions that promoted these interventions, while minimizing their risks and uncertainties.

This week’s news suggests that wave is still building.

And Cleveland Clinic is not just another hospital. 

Its physicians train doctors around the world. Its recommendations influence medical practice far beyond Ohio. When an institution with that kind of stature decides it will no longer offer these interventions to minors for the next two decades, people pay attention.

The decision also comes as other medical organizations are showing greater caution.

Earlier this year, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons said the evidence does not clearly support these interventions for minors, and recommended waiting until adulthood for surgery.

Even the American Medical Association acknowledged that the evidence for surgical interventions in minors is weak.

Taken together, these developments tell a story.

For years, the public was told that "the science was settled."

Now, some of the nation’s most influential medical institutions are acknowledging uncertainty, reassessing evidence, and stepping back from procedures that permanently alter healthy bodies.

And that matters.

The debate over these interventions is no longer confined to politics, legislatures, or courtrooms. It is increasingly taking place inside the medical establishment itself.

It is evidence that the tide has turned. 

It is a sign that accountability has arrived.

For WORLD, I’m Daniel Suhr.

WORLD Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of WORLD Radio programming is the audio record.