The Democrats’ big tax cut for the rich | WORLD
Logo
Sound journalism, grounded in facts and Biblical truth | Donate

The Democrats’ big tax cut for the rich

Tax proposal is SALT in the wound to poor states


You have {{ remainingArticles }} free {{ counterWords }} remaining. You've read all of your free articles.

Full access isn’t far.

We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.

Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.

Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.

LET'S GO

Already a member? Sign in.

The legislative status of many of the Biden administration’s various spending plans has been in near constant state of flux. Wherever it all ends up, the plan currently is for the Build Back Better bill to include an obscure change to the tax code that will actually build back the bank accounts of affluent individuals in wealthy blue states—at the expense of taxpayers in poorer, lower-spending red states. This would be done by means of a rule that favors taxpayers in higher tax states through the federal tax code.

The Trump tax plan had placed a cap of $10,000 on the amount of state and local taxes (SALT) that could be deducted from federal taxable income. By doing so, it limited the ability of taxpayers to “write-off” state and local taxes. But a high or unlimited write-off of local taxes, by its very nature, favors those who paid the highest local taxes, and the mathematics of that favors two (overlapping) categories of people: those who are wealthy and those who live in high tax states. Furthermore, the deduction allowed to state and local taxes incentivizes liberal state governments to adopt ever-higher tax rates, politically cushioned by the federal tax code. It’s a perverse incentive.

When President Trump’s tax overhaul with the $10,000 cap on SALT deductions went through, the bias favoring the rich was removed, and predictably, wealthy blue states did most of the complaining. This also triggered headlines such as one from a consultant in the New York/New Jersey metro area talking about how his wealthy clients are fleeing the region “like it’s on fire.” If capping the deduction at $10,000 triggered panic among wealthy people in high tax states, then dramatically raising that cap clearly favors them.

And this unveils the profound contradictions between liberal tax rhetoric and real-world tax reality. The left talks about redistribution and rhetorically excoriates the wealthy, but then they pass bills that hand out tax favors to their friends. By the billions.

They might wag their heads in apparent displeasure at large companies that “pay no taxes.” Still, if you look at the details, you’ll typically see lavish deductions for “green” initiatives and other nods to social engineering via tax deductions, credits, and exclusions. In this, as well as many other cases (for example, inflationary policies that hurt the poor and help certain sectors of the ruling class), the left talks the talk of downward redistribution, but walks the walk of protecting their own. Of course, their preferred policies tend to be targeted to political allies, in this particular instance, the highest tax states.

Though the state and local deduction issue is debatable in general, it does present a certain cognitive dissonance for the left, in that it implies that state and local taxes are indeed expenses and not “investments.” Think of it this way: if those taxes buy something of genuine value, they should not need a tax loophole to encourage them. If these states are really delivering service enhancements commensurate with the tax bill, the voters can register that with their ballots and don’t need a thumb on the scale hidden in the details of the tax regulations.

What are Christians to think about all this? While the Bible is not principally focused on the details of tax policy, the examples we have point us away from tax policy as a means of handing out benefits to friends and detriments to enemies. The warning to Israel about choosing a king like the “other nations” in 1 Samuel 8 includes a warning that Saul would end up doing just that. The Torah commands that Israel favor neither the rich nor the poor. The fundamental principle seems to be grounded in a realistic view of human nature. We tend to love our friends and hate our enemies. That fact doesn’t change when we write tax law. In fact, it’s even easier to hide true intentions in the copious fine print of the IRS tax code. In other words, watch carefully when tax policy is being legislated, for a lot more than taxation is sure to be revealed.


Jerry Bowyer

Jerry is the chief economist of Vident Financial, editor of Townhall Finance, editor of the business channel of The Christian Post, host of the Meeting of Minds With Jerry Bowyer podcast, president of Bowyer Research, and author of The Maker Versus the Takers: What Jesus Really Said About Social Justice and Economics. He is also a resident economist with Kingdom Advisors, serves on the editorial board of Salem Communications, and is a senior fellow in financial economics at the Center for Cultural Leadership. Jerry lives in Pennsylvania with his wife, Susan, and the youngest three of his seven children.


Read the Latest from WORLD Opinions

R. Albert Mohler Jr. | Voting to preserve the permanent things

Andrew T. Walker | This principle should guide Christians in evaluating parties and candidates

Kristen Waggoner | The 2024 election is crucial for the protection of the free speech needed to expose harmful falsehoods

John Stonestreet | This year’s election is indeed the most important of our lifetime

COMMENT BELOW

Please wait while we load the latest comments...

Comments