Laws that should be broken
Christians should defy tyrannical restrictions such as buffer zones prohibiting silent prayer
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
The United Kingdom’s Home Office—its version of U.S. Homeland Security—is dragging its heels on issuing new “guidance” for the nation’s buffer zone law, which prohibits public gatherings within 492 feet of an abortion business.
The law, which passed in 2023, was designed to block pro-life demonstrations and sidewalk ministries, but local law enforcement in towns throughout the U.K. have made a series of embarrassing and high-profile blunders trying to enforce it (and similar local measures).
The Home Office promised to publish clearer guidance this past spring, but nothing is available yet. Maybe that’s not surprising. A “buffer zone,” which, astonishingly, includes prohibitions on silent prayer, is difficult to justify, especially in light of the U.K.’s human rights laws. Just last month, the local police department in Birmingham, England, paid around $17,000 in a settlement to Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, a woman arrested outside an abortion business because she admitted she was praying “in her head.”
It hardly seems necessary to point out that even if no one says this out loud, the only kind of prayer up for discussion here is the Christian kind. This is worth reflecting upon. Not only is it impossible to imagine U.K. officials outlawing a Muslim prayer, for example, but it’s also worth noting that no one other than Christians gathers in front of abortion businesses to pray for vulnerable moms and babies.
Whenever the Home Office guidance ultimately materializes, Christians ought to be prepared to defy it—not to be contentious on purpose, but because freedom of thought and the freedom to seek the presence of God is fundamental. No other freedoms can exist without these. Laws that attempt to defy the moral and natural order of the world demand to be broken.
Consider the response of Vaughan-Spruce when she was arrested last year outside an abortion business in Birmingham. A video of the incident went viral.
“What are you doing here today?” A local police officer asks.
“Physically, I’m just standing here,” Vaughan-Spruce answers.
“Why here of all places?” The officer asks. “Are you praying?”
“I might be praying inside my head,” she answers.
And she’s arrested.
We can’t help but feel a pang of sympathy for the civil servant, who was clearly uncomfortable but too cowardly to do the right thing. But in watching this cringeworthy video, a reasonable question arises: Why didn’t Vaughan-Spruce just say she wasn’t praying? For that matter, why did Adam Smith-Connor, the man similarly arrested outside another abortion shop and currently awaiting trial, openly admit to local officials that he was indeed praying silently, too?
Often, when someone who has done something courageous is later asked what gave him the strength to do it, he’ll say something like, “I don’t know, I just did it.” That’s not always false humility. Maybe some decisions are so uncomplicated and rational that the alternative doesn’t even occur to people. Maybe for Vaughan-Spruce and Smith-Connor, lying about praying never seemed like an option—and maybe that was because the goodness of the Lord is their strength and a law against prayer simply doesn’t compute.
What if every Christian began treating irrational and evil laws, procedures, or even social norms as they ought to be treated—by refusing to comply? What if we refuse to put our “preferred pronouns” on our medical forms? What if we stopped walking past the LGBTQ pride display at the library without at least mentioning—politely—to the librarian that I just want you to know I wish this wasn’t here; kids don’t want or deserve this? What if we explicitly demanded the pediatrician, the nurse, or the teacher not speak to our children about their “gender identity”?
If these buffer zone arrest videos coming out of the U.K. are any indication, the people tasked with enforcing these laws realize how absurd they are. Most of the time, these policies aren’t written by actual law enforcement officers, self-respecting medical professionals, or conscientious teachers. They’re written by bureaucrats and grandstanders who will never actually have to put their bad ideas into practice.
I’ve heard stories from doctors and nurses who know that the gender madness is delusional but feel trapped into going along with it at work. I know teachers who see the damage that progressive ideology is doing to the minds and hearts of their students but who don’t know how to stop it and keep their jobs. Many of these compelled enforcers are dying for someone to say something. Sure, maybe they should speak up anyway, despite the risks. But if they don’t, couldn’t Christians do it for them—as well as for our neighbors, who are also subject to their authority?
Cultural winds are a numbers game. These laws, policies, and norms got traction in the first place because the people with the bad ideas applied good pressure. Christians ought to start applying the same kind of pressure—just aimed in the right direction: Are we praying? Yes, we are. Why, do you want to join us?
These daily articles have become part of my steady diet. —Barbara
Sign up to receive the WORLD Opinions email newsletter each weekday for sound commentary from trusted voices.Read the Latest from WORLD Opinions
Hunter Baker | Reflections on an election that will be long remembered
Erick Erickson | Donald Trump’s victory was a resounding defeat of leftist ideology
Nathanael Blake | The self-destruction of our culture gives Christians the opportunity to proclaim Christ to the world
R. Albert Mohler Jr. | It was a clear and convincing victory for former President Donald Trump
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.