Allah did not shield him
Ayatollah Khamenei’s death and its meaning
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
Iran’s supreme leader—one of the most vicious Shiite dictators in modern history, the architect of decades of state-sponsored terrorism, and the man whose regime reportedly executed nearly 38,000 of its own people in recent weeks—has been eliminated. The Iranian people deserve to live and flourish. The Iranian regime deserves to fall. On Feb. 28, that fall began in earnest.
On Saturday morning, the United States and Israel launched a precise and devastating joint military operation—designated Operation Epic Fury by the United States and Operation Lion’s Roar by Israel—against the heart of the Shiite regime. According to The Wall Street Journal, Israeli jets dropped 30 precision bombs on Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s fortified compound in Tehran after intelligence confirmed a rare high-level gathering involving Khamenei and approximately 40 senior regime figures. Iranian state media has since acknowledged his death, though details remain fluid.
Khamenei had held the position of supreme leader since 1989, serving as the regime’s paramount authority for nearly four decades.
The strategic consequences are enormous. These individuals formed the operational core of a theocratic apparatus that has terrorized its region and brutalized its own population for decades. The regime cannot easily survive this.
But beyond the geopolitical reverberations, the theological and religious consequences deserve equal attention—because Shiite Islam’s entire framework of leadership makes Khamenei’s death not merely a political event but a profound doctrinal crisis.
To appreciate the full weight of this moment, one must understand the oldest and deepest fracture in Islam. The Sunni-Shiite split dates to the seventh/eighth century, rooted in a foundational dispute over who held the rightful authority to lead the Muslim community after Muhammad’s death. Sunnis—who comprise roughly 85 to 90 percent of the world’s Muslims—maintained that leadership should pass to qualified companions of Muhammad, while Shiites held that authority belonged exclusively to Muhammad’s bloodline, beginning with his cousin and son-in-law Ali.
That ancient schism has never healed, and it shapes Middle Eastern geopolitics to this day. Iran, the world’s dominant Shiite power, has spent decades bankrolling Shiite proxy forces across the Arab world—Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, militias in Iraq and Syria—in a relentless bid to project power into predominantly Sunni territory. The Gulf states, led by Saudi Arabia, have long viewed Tehran not merely as a regional rival but as an ideological and sectarian threat to their own stability and legitimacy.
The events of Feb. 28 have now made plain that Iran’s aggression has finally exhausted whatever residual restraint its Arab neighbors maintained. The regime did not unite the Muslim world behind it—it united the Sunni Arab world against it.
In Twelver Shiism—the dominant strand of Shiite Islam—Muslims believe that following Muhammad’s death, twelve infallible Imams served as his rightful successors, wielding both spiritual and political authority over the Muslim community. The twelfth of these, known as al-Mahdi, is believed to have entered a state of occultation in A.D. 941—hidden from the world but still alive, still guiding the faithful through qualified intermediaries until his eventual return or reappearance.
This is the doctrinal foundation on which the Iranian regime constructed its entire legitimacy.
The governing principle, known as Wilayat al-Faqih—Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist—holds that during the Twelfth Imam’s absence, a supremely qualified Islamic jurist assumes comprehensive authority over religious, political, military, and social affairs as the Imam’s deputy on earth. Khamenei occupied precisely that role. He was not merely a political leader. He was presented as the living representative of the Hidden Imam, the speaking mouth of divine will, shielded by Allah against his enemies.
His honorific title makes this explicit. “Ayatollah” is not a personal name—it is a deliberately bestowed title meaning “Sign of Allah” or “Miracle of Allah.” In the regime’s theology, he was nothing less than a quasi-sacred figure: infallible in religious matters, divinely protected, and untouchable.
But on Saturday, he was not protected. Allah did not shield him.
Khamenei’s death strikes at the very foundation of the Islamic Republic’s theological claims and self-understanding. The regime built its legitimacy on the claim of divine guardianship—and that claim has now been exposed, visibly and violently, as a lie. A man presented to his people as the Sign of Allah was killed by precision bombs before dawn.
Hardline Shiites will work quickly to reframe this. They are already moving to cast his death as martyrdom—invoking narratives of divine testing, sacrifice, and resistance against the enemies of Allah. Certain apocalyptic factions will go further, treating his elimination as a trigger for end-times mobilization, linking the crisis of leadership to the imminent return of the Mahdi and framing the moment as the opening of a cosmic struggle against Israeli and American forces.
They are also working urgently to designate a successor—a third supreme leader. Every person who hopes for a freer Iran should hope that the Iranian people rise to prevent exactly that, and instead seize this moment to choose their own democratic, modern leadership.
Iran’s retaliatory strikes, far from demonstrating strength, have only deepened its isolation.
The regime launched missiles and drones against multiple Arab Muslim nations—targeting facilities in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, and Jordan. These are countries that have long suffered Iranian subversion and proxy warfare. The response was immediate and forceful. Saudi Arabia announced it had successfully repelled the attacks and explicitly reserved its full right to respond, effectively aligning the Gulf states in active opposition to Tehran.
For the first time in decades, the nations Iran once sought to dominate are united in pushing back against the regime that styled itself the vanguard of the Muslim world.
Khamenei’s elimination is the most significant blow yet to a radical extremist doctrine that has poisoned the region since the 1979 revolution. It does not end the regime overnight—but it marks the beginning of its effective end, and it constitutes a direct step toward the long-anticipated collapse of the entire apparatus of terror he spent his life building.
These daily articles have become part of my steady diet. —Barbara
Sign up to receive the WORLD Opinions email newsletter each weekday for sound commentary from trusted voices.Read the Latest from WORLD Opinions
Thaddeus Williams | America’s “existential crisis of meaning” is similar to the Babylonian king’s crisis, and the solution is the same, too
A.S. Ibrahim | In pointing to the attitudes of Muslim immigrants, Trump says what Europe’s leaders still won’t
Colin J. Smothers | The liberal religion of Senate candidate Adam Hamilton
Denny Burk | A recent article on Elisabeth Elliot is way over that line
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.