A carpet of capitulation
The Vatican showed great folly in accommodating Islamic prayer rugs in its library
The Vatican Apostolic Library in 2010 Associated Press / Photo by Pier Paolo Cito
Full access isn’t far.
We can’t release more of our sound journalism without a subscription, but we can make it easy for you to come aboard.
Get started for as low as $3.99 per month.
Current WORLD subscribers can log in to access content. Just go to "SIGN IN" at the top right.
LET'S GOAlready a member? Sign in.
The Vatican Apostolic Library, long seen as the center of Catholic scholarship and biblical study, now echoes with the alien cadence of the Islamic call to prayer. Father Don Giacomo Cardinali, vice prefect of the library, casually announced a recent decision that chills the soul of every faithful Christian. The Vatican has opened a dedicated prayer room for Muslims within its own walls.
Let that sink in. Muslim researchers requested “a room with a carpet to pray,” and the Vatican obliged—granting space for Islamic devotion. Cardinali, with a tone of strange detachment, called the library a “universal institution” open to scholars of all faiths, yet neglected to note that only Muslims have been granted a special place for their daily rituals. When the rightful backlash erupted, Cardinali doubled down, insisting, “We are a universal library” and “the most secular of the entire Holy See.” To him, a room with a carpet is harmless hospitality. To history and theology, it is a grave concession—a velvet rug rolled out not merely for prayer, but for the subtle incursion of a rival creed into the epicenter of Catholicism.
The Vatican, which considers itself the guardian of Peter’s legacy, now bends backward to appease Islam and its anti-biblical claims, as if shared scholarship excuses the compromise of Christian distinctives. Cardinali’s words ring hollow against the library’s storied past. Founded in the 15th century to preserve the Church’s intellectual heritage, it has withstood inquisitions, wars, and schisms—always testifying to Christianity’s exclusive truth. Today, that truth is muffled beneath the soft pad of a prayer mat, where invocations to Allah will rise amid codices of the Gospels. In one corner, Scripture proclaims, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life” (John 14:6); in another, the Quran denies, “They never killed him nor crucified him.” This is no innocent gesture. It is betrayal—a naïve bow to pluralism that invites falsehood into the library.
To grasp the gravity of this folly, one must look beyond the Vatican’s ecumenical lens to Islam’s unyielding worldview. Muslims do not view their faith as one among many, but as the final, triumphant revelation. Public prayer, especially among the devout and educated, is not mere piety but a declaration of dominance. Across Western cities, Muslim congregations turn streets into open-air mosques on Fridays, halting traffic in a public display of submission to Allah. These are not quiet devotions but strategic assertions of presence, inscribing Islamic identity onto the public square.
More insidiously, Muslim activists infiltrate Christian spaces—cathedrals, universities, Christmas markets—to perform rituals that announce Islam’s presence and superiority. Recall the viral images of Muslims praying outside Notre-Dame or the push for halal sections at Vatican events. Each act is a chess move in a larger game—not coexistence, but conquest through visibility. Muslims see it as a divine form of jihad against non-Muslims. What the Vatican hails as “ecumenical” is, to these researchers and their co-religionists, a trophy—a victory in the heart of Christendom. By granting this prayer room, the Vatican has effectively handed Islam a megaphone within its city.
How long before this is cited as proof that even the Cross bows to the Crescent?
Contrast this with Mecca, Muhammad’s birthplace, where Christians, Jews, and all non-Muslims are forbidden entry, deemed ritually impure under Sharia. No Christian prayer room graces the Grand Mosque; no evangelistic tent rises in Arabia. Could we ever imagine a church beside the Kaaba, or a gospel event in the Prophet’s Mosque? Islam’s reciprocity is a fantasy.
The Vatican’s gesture is unilateral disarmament in a spiritual clash of worldviews.
This accommodation is a monument to profound naivety and ignorance of Islam’s core doctrines. The Qur’an leaves no ambiguity: Islam alone is the true and final faith, rendering Judaism and Christianity as corrupt deviations. “Whoever desires other than Islam as religion—never will it be accepted from him,” it declares. Anti-Christian verses abound: Jesus is reduced to a prophet, the Trinity condemned as polytheism, Christians portrayed as misguided infidels with falsified scriptures. Jews fare no better, branded as objects of divine wrath.
Islam does not seek pluralism or peaceful coexistence—it demands submission and proclaims supremacy. Yet the Vatican rolls out the rug. Upon that rug, five times a day, the Shahada will now resound: “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger”—a creed affirming Islam’s truth over the Catholic kafir’s error. Christians are cast as misguided, Jews as cursed. What grotesque irony: a space ostensibly set aside for Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, hosting rites that deny His divinity.
Where does such folly end? Shall we expect a Hindu puja altar for visiting scholars from Delhi, or a Buddhist zendo for those perusing patristic texts? If “universality” demands it, why stop with Islam’s carpet?
This is not hospitality. It is capitulation—a betrayal of Christianity masquerading as tolerance. The Vatican has sacrificed fidelity for a hollow ecumenism, eroding biblical truth and welcoming deception into its halls.
These daily articles have become part of my steady diet. —Barbara
Sign up to receive the WORLD Opinions email newsletter each weekday for sound commentary from trusted voices.Read the Latest from WORLD Opinions
David L. Bahnsen | We have a house affordability problem, but don’t blame institutional investors
Daniel Darling | A conflict from 35 years ago shows us how to take military action when a fight is necessary
R. Albert Mohler Jr. | In a Senate hearing yesterday, a display of leftist insanity revealed a culture on the brink of disaster
Joseph Backholm | The Hyde Amendment must be non-negotiable for GOP lawmakers
Please wait while we load the latest comments...
Comments
Please register, subscribe, or log in to comment on this article.